Nanosheet transfection: effective transfer of naked DNA on silica glass
Source abstract
Abstract
Existing gene delivery technologies using nonviral vectors or physical stimulation are limited by cytotoxicity. Here, we reveal an easy and new method to fabricate silica upright nanosheets, which can be easily scaled up and used for gene delivery. We demonstrate that naked DNA can be transferred into difficult-to-transfect cells (for example, stem cells) by plating cells on silica glass with the upright nanosheets without using any vector. Gene entry is probably achieved through the integrin-FAK-Rho signaling axis, which can be activated by the cytoskeleton rearrangement on nanosheets in a limited time frame (‘transfection window’). Transfecting naked GATA4-binding protein 4 plasmids into stem cells can upregulate the other two important cardiac marker genes myocyte enhancer factor 2C and T-box 5. The transfected mesenchymal stem cells express the cardiac marker proteins at 7 days after transfection, which confirms the success of the innovative gene delivery approach. The vector-free silica nanosheet-induced transfection is simple and effective but faster and safer than the conventional technologies. ‘Naked’ DNA strands can directly transfer into host cells using surfaces embedded with freestanding silica nanosheets, finds a new study. Gene therapy has the potential to elimate disease by altering a patient's genetic code, but getting designer DNA plasmids past cellular membranes is difficult. Now, Shan-hui Hsu from the National Taiwan University and co-workers in Japan have developed a strategy to improve gene delivery with a procedure that elimates the need to use viruses or other biocompatible molecules to carry nucleic acids into cells. Adding naked DNA plasmid onto glass substrates covered with rough nanosheet textures enhanced entry of cardiac marker gene (GATA4) into stem cells by mediating cell-membrane receptors. This low-cost strategy introduced genes to 70% of starting cells within 24 hours, making it attractive for scalable in vivo gene delivery with limited cytotoxicity side effects. A nanosheet structure on a glass plate can transfer naked DNA into difficult-to-transfect cells (for example, stem cells) in limited time after contact (‘transfection window’) without any vector. The transfected cells express the specific proteins a week later. The gene uptake and expression are associated with the cytoskeleton arrangement on the silica nanosheets by activating the cell-membrane integrin receptor.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Mintzer, M. A. & Simanek, E. E. Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chem. Rev. 109, 259–302 (2009).10.1021/cr800409e ↗
2. Wu, Y.-L., Putcha, N., Ng, K. W., Leong, D. T., Lim, C. T., Loo, S. C. J. & Chen, X. Biophysical responses upon the interaction of nanomaterials with cellular interfaces. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 782–791 (2013).10.1021/ar300046u ↗
3. Tay, C. Y., Cai, P., Setyawati, M. I., Fang, W., Tan, L. P., Hong, C. H. L., Chen, X. & Leong, D. T. Nanoparticles strengthen intracellular tension and retard cellular migration. Nano Lett. 14, 83–88 (2014).10.1021/nl4032549 ↗
4. Mehier-Humbert, S. & Guy, R. H. Physical methods for gene transfer: improving the kinetics of gene delivery into cells. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 733–753 (2005).10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.007 ↗
5. Tang, L., Liu, W. & Liu, G. High-strength hydrogels with integrated functions of H-bonding and thermoresponsive surface-mediated reverse transfection and cell detachment. Adv. Mater. 22, 2652–2656 (2010).10.1002/adma.200904016 ↗
6. Li, K., Feng, L., Shen, J., Zhang, Q., Liu, Z., Lee, S.-T. & Liu, J. Patterned substrates of nano-graphene oxide mediating highly localized and efficient gene delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 5900–5907 (2014).10.1021/am5008134 ↗
7. Teo, B. K. K., Goh, S. H., Kustandi, T. S., Loh, W. W., Low, H. Y. & Yim, E. K. F. The effect of micro and nanotopography on endocytosis in drug and gene delivery systems. Biomaterials 32, 9866–9875 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.088 ↗
8. Kim, W., Ng, J. K., Kunitake, M. E., Conklin, B. R. & Yang, P. D. Interfacing silicon nanowires with mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 7228–7229 (2007).10.1021/ja071456k ↗
9. Shalek, A. K., Robinson, J. T., Karp, E. S., Lee, J. S., Ahn, D.-R., Yoon, M.-H., Suttona, A., Jorgollic, M., Gertnera, R. S., Gujrala, T. S., MacBeath, G., Yang, E. G. & Park, H. Vertical silicon nanowires as a universal platform for delivering biomolecules into living cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1870–1875 (2010).10.1073/pnas.0909350107 ↗
10. Adler, A. F. & Leong, K. W. Emerging links between surface nanotechnology and endocytosis: impact on nonviral gene delivery. Nano Today 5, 553–569 (2010).10.1016/j.nantod.2010.10.007 ↗
11. Bettinger, C. J., Langer, R. & Borenstein, J. T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48, 5406–5415 (2009).10.1002/anie.200805179 ↗
12. Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P. & Bershadsky, A. D. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 21–33 (2009).10.1038/nrm2593 ↗
13. Dalby, M. J., Yarwood, S. J., Johnstone, H. J., Affrossman, S. & Riehle, M. O. Fibroblast signaling events in response to nanotopography: a gene array study. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 1, 12–17 (2002).10.1109/TNB.2002.806930 ↗
14. Teo, B. K. K., Wong, S. T., Lim, C. K., Kung, T. Y. S., Yap, C. H., Ramagopal, Y., Romer, L. H. & Yim, E. K. F. Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. ACS Nano 7, 4785–4798 (2013).10.1021/nn304966z ↗
15. Choia, C.-H., Hagvall, S. H., Wu, B. M., Dunn, J. C. Y., Beyguic, R. E. & Kim, C.-J. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. Biomaterials 28, 1672–1679 (2007).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.031 ↗
16. Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N. & Wilkinson, C. D. W. The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 84, 973–979 (2008).10.1002/jbm.a.31409 ↗
17. Ji, Q., Yamazaki, T., Hanagata, N., Lee, M. V., Hill, J. P. & Ariga, K. Silica-based gene reverse transfection: an upright nanosheet network for promoted DNA delivery to cells. Chem. Commun. 48, 8496–8498 (2012).10.1039/c2cc34289h ↗
18. Li, X., Zhi, C., Hanagata, N., Yamaguchi, M., Bando, Y. & Golberg, D. Boron nitride nanotubes functionalized with mesoporous silica for intracellular delivery of chemotherapy drugs. Chem. Commun. 49, 7337–7339 (2013).10.1039/c3cc42743a ↗
19. Xiao, X., He, Q. & Huang, K. Novel amino-modified silica nanoparticles as efficient vector for hepatocellular carcinoma gene therapy. Med. Oncol. 27, 1200–1207 (2010).10.1007/s12032-009-9359-9 ↗
20. Nan, A., Bai, X., Son, S. J., Lee, S. B. & Ghandehari, H. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of silica nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8, 2150–2154 (2008).10.1021/nl0802741 ↗
21. Shiu, J. Y., Kuo, C. W., Whang, W. T. & Chen, P. L. Observation of enhanced cell adhesion and transfection efficiency on superhydrophobic surfaces. Lab Chip 10, 556–558 (2010).10.1039/c000798f ↗
22. Chen, Y., Chu, C., Zhou, Y., Ru, Y., Chen, H., Chen, F., He, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L. & Shi, J. Reversible pore-structure evolution in hollow silica nanocapsules: large pores for siRNA delivery and nanoparticle collecting. Small 7, 2935–2944 (2011).10.1002/smll.201101055 ↗
23. Niu, Y., Yu, M., Hartono, S. B., Yang, J., Xu, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zou, J., Dexter, A., Gu, W. & Yu, C. Nanoparticles mimicking viral surface topography for enhanced cellular delivery. Adv. Mater. 25, 1–5 (2013).10.1002/adma.201370001 ↗
24. Hanson, L., Lin, Z. C., Xie, C., Cui, Y. & Cui, B. Characterization of the cell–nanopillar interface by transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett. 12, 5815–5820 (2012).10.1021/nl303163y ↗
25. Arnold, M., Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A., Glass, R., Blümmel, J., Eck, W., Kantlehner, M., Kessler, H. & Spatz, J. P. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chem. Phys. Chem. 5, 383–388 (2004).10.1002/cphc.200301014 ↗
26. Yim, E. K., Darling, E. M., Kulangara, K., Guilak, F. & Leong, K. W. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31, 1299–1306 (2010).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.037 ↗
27. Grassart, A., Meas-Yedid, V., Dufour, A., Olivo-Marin, J. C., Dautry-Varsat, A. & Sauvonnet, N. Pak1 phosphorylation enhances cortactin–N-WASP interaction in clathrin-caveolin-independent endocytosis. Traffic 11, 1079–1091 (2010).10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01075.x ↗
28. Lamaze, C., Dujeancourt, A., Baba, T., Lo, C. G., Benmerah, A. & Dautry-Varsat, A. Interleukin 2 receptors and detergent-resistant membrane domains define a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway. Mol. Cell 7, 661–671 (2001).10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00212-X ↗
29. Kerr, B. A., Otani, T., Koyama, E., Freeman, T. A. & Enomoto-Iwamoto, M. Small GTPase protein Rac-1 is activated with maturation and regulates cell morphology and function in chondrocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 314, 1301–1312 (2008).10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.12.029 ↗
30. Boyd, N. D., Chan, B. M. C. & Petersen, N. O. Adaptor protein-2 exhibits α1β1 or α6β1 integrin-dependent dedistribution in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Biochemistry 41, 232–240 (2002).10.1021/bi011501f ↗
31. Yang, K., Jung, K., Ko, E., Kim, J. i. n., Park, K. I., Kim, J. & Cho, S.-W. Nanotopographical manipulation of focal adhesion formation for enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10529–10540 (2013).10.1021/am402156f ↗
32. Barczyk, M., Carracedo, S. & Gullberg, D. Integrins. Cell Tissue Res. 339, 269–280 (2010).10.1007/s00441-009-0834-6 ↗
33. Singh, R. & Lillard, J. W. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 86, 215–223 (2009).10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.004 ↗
34. Sharei, A., Zoldan, J., Adamo, A., Sim, W. Y., Cho, N., Jackson, E., Mao, S., Schneider, S., Han, M.-J., Lytton-Jean, A., Basto, P. A., Jhunjhunwala, S., Lee, J., Heller, D. A., Kang, J. W., Hartoularos, G. C., Kim, K.-S., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R. & Jensen, K. F. A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2082–2087 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1218705110 ↗
35. Budker, V., Budker, T., Zhang, G., Subbotin, V., Loomis, A. & Wolff, J. A. Hypothesis: naked plasmid DNA is taken up by cells in vivo by a receptor-mediated process. J. Gene. Med. 2, 76–88 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1521-2254(200003/04)2:2<76::AID-JGM97>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
36. Wiesner, S., Lange, A. & Fassler, R. Local call: from integrins to actin assembly. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 327–329 (2006).10.1016/j.tcb.2006.05.002 ↗
37. Huang, J. & Ding, J. Nanostructured interfaces with RGD arrays to control cell–matrix interaction. Soft Matter 6, 3395–3401 (2010).10.1039/b927168f ↗
38. Houweling, A. C., Borren, M. M., Moorman, A. F. M. & Christoffels, V. M. Expression and regulation of the atrial natriuretic factor encoding gene Nppa during development and disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 67, 583–593 (2005).10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.06.013 ↗
39. Qian, L., Huang, Y., Spencer, C. I., Foley, A., Vedantham, V., Liu, L., Conway, S. J., Fu, J.-d. & Srivastava, D. In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature 485, 593–598 (2012).10.1038/nature11044 ↗