Cargo–carrier interactions significantly contribute to micellar conformation and biodistribution
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Strategies to deliver drugs using nanocarriers, which are passively or actively targeted to their alleged site of action might favorably affect benefit–risk profiles of novel therapeutics. Here we tested the hypothesis whether the physico-chemical properties of the cargo as well as the actual conditions during encapsulation interfere during formulation of nanoparticular cargo–carrier systems. On the basis of previous work, a versatile class of nanocarriers is polyether-based ABC triblock terpolymer micelles with diameters below 50 nm. Their tunable chemistry and size allows to systematically vary important parameters. We demonstrate in vivo differences in pharmacokinetics and biodistribution not only dependent on micellar net charge but also on the properties of encapsulated (model) drugs and their localization within the micelles. On the basis of in vitro and in vivo evidence we propose that depending on drug cargo and encapsulation conditions micelles with homogeneous or heterogeneous corona structure are formed, contributing to an altered pharmacokinetic profile as differences in cargo location occur. Thus, these interactions have to be considered when a carrier system is selected to achieve optimal delivery to a given tissue.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Recknagel, P., Gonnert, F. A., Westermann, M., Lambeck, S., Lupp, A., Rudiger, A., Dyson, A., Carré, J. E., Kortgen, A., Krafft, C., Popp, J., Sponholz, C., Fuhrmann, V., Hilger, I., Claus, R. A., Riedemann, N. C., Wetzker, R., Singer, M., Trauner, M. & Bauer, M. Liver dysfunction and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signalling in early sepsis: experimental studies in rodent models of peritonitis. PLoS Med.9, e1001338 (2012).10.1371/journal.pmed.1001338 ↗
2. Tibbitt, M. W., Dahlman, J. E. & Langer, R. Emerging frontiers in drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 704–717 (2016).10.1021/jacs.5b09974 ↗
3. Zhang, S., Gao, H. & Bao, G. Physical principles of nanoparticle cellular endocytosis. ACS Nano9, 8655–8671 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b03184 ↗
4. Zhu, M., Nie, G., Meng, H., Xia, T., Nel, A. & Zhao, Y. Physicochemical properties determine nanomaterial cellular uptake, transport, and fate. Acc. Chem. Res.46, 622–631 (2013).10.1021/ar300031y ↗
5. Rivera-Gil, P., Jimenez de Aberasturi, D., Wulf, V., Pelaz, B., del Pino, P., Zhao, Y., de la Fuente, J. M., Ruiz de Larramendi, I., Rojo, T., Liang, X. J. & Parak, W. J. The challenge to relate the physicochemical properties of colloidal nanoparticles to their cytotoxicity. Acc. Chem. Res.46, 743–749 (2013).10.1021/ar300039j ↗
6. Johnston, A. P. R., Such, G. K., Ng, S. L. & Caruso, F. Challenges facing colloidal delivery systems: from synthesis to the clinic. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.16, 171–181 (2011).10.1016/j.cocis.2010.11.003 ↗
7. Martens, T. F., Remaut, K., Demeester, J., De Smedt, S. C. & Braeckmans, K. Intracellular delivery of nanomaterials: how to catch endosomal escape in the act. Nano Today9, 344–364 (2014).10.1016/j.nantod.2014.04.011 ↗
8. Breunig, M., Lungwitz, U., Liebl, R. & Goepferich, A. Breaking up the correlation between efficacy and toxicity for nonviral gene delivery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 14454–14459 (2007).10.1073/pnas.0703882104 ↗
9. Synatschke, C. V., Schallon, A., Jérôme, V., Freitag, R. & Müller, A. H. E. Influence of polymer architecture and molecular weight of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) polycations on transfection efficiency and cell viability in gene delivery. Biomacromolecules12, 4247–4255 (2011).10.1021/bm201111d ↗
10. Cabral, H., Matsumoto, Y., Mizuno, K., Chen, Q., Murakami, M., Kimura, M., Terada, Y., Kano, M. R., Miyazono, K., Uesaka, M., Nishiyama, N. & Kataoka, K. Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size. Nat. Nanotechnol.6, 815–823 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2011.166 ↗
11. Jokerst, J. V., Lobovkina, T., Zare, R. N. & Gambhir, S. S. Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy. Nanomedicine6, 715–728 (2011).10.2217/nnm.11.19 ↗
12. Ishihara, T., Takeda, M., Sakamoto, H., Kimoto, A., Kobayashi, C., Takasaki, N., Yuki, K., Tanaka, K., Takenaga, M., Igarashi, R., Maeda, T., Yamakawa, N., Okamoto, Y., Otsuka, M., Ishida, T., Kiwada, H., Mizushima, Y. & Mizushima, T. Accelerated blood clearance phenomenon upon repeated injection of PEG-modified PLA-nanoparticles. Pharm. Res.26, 2270–2279 (2009).10.1007/s11095-009-9943-x ↗
13. Saadati, R., Dadashzadeh, S., Abbasian, Z. & Soleimanjahi, H. Accelerated blood clearance of PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles following repeated injections: effects of polymer dose, PEG coating, and encapsulated anticancer drug. Pharm. Res.30, 985–995 (2013).10.1007/s11095-012-0934-y ↗
14. Schacher, F. H., Rupar, P. A. & Manners, I. Functional block copolymers: nanostructured materials with emerging applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 7898–7921 (2012).10.1002/anie.201200310 ↗
15. Dang, N. M., Zhao, W.-W., Yusa, S.-I., Noguchi, H. & Nakashima, K. Cobalt oxide hollow nanoparticles as synthesized by templating a tri-block copolymer micelle with a core—shell—corona structure: a promising anode material for lithium ion batteries. New J. Chem.39, 4726–4730 (2015).10.1039/C5NJ00058K ↗
16. Guerlain, C., Piogé, S., Detrembleur, C., Fustin, C.-A. & Gohy, J.-F. Self-assembly of a triblock terpolymer mediated by hydrogen-bonded complexes. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem.53, 459–467 (2015).10.1002/pola.27471 ↗
17. Sasidharan, M. & Nakashima, K. Core–shell–corona polymeric micelles as a versatile template for synthesis of inorganic hollow nanospheres. Acc. Chem. Res.47, 157–167 (2013).10.1021/ar4001026 ↗
18. Zhao, X. & Liu, P. Reduction-responsive core–shell–corona micelles based on triblock copolymers: novel synthetic strategy, characterization, and application as a tumor microenvironment-responsive drug delivery system. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces7, 166–174 (2014).10.1021/am505531e ↗
19. Rinkenauer, A. C., Schallon, A., Günther, U., Wagner, M., Betthausen, E., Schubert, U. S. & Schacher, F. H. A paradigm change: efficient transfection of human leukemia cells by stimuli-responsive multicompartment micelles. ACS Nano7, 9621–9631 (2013).10.1021/nn402072d ↗
20. Barthel, M. J., Mansfeld, U., Hoeppener, S., Czaplewska, J. A., Schacher, F. H. & Schubert, U. S. Understanding and tuning the self-assembly of polyether-based triblock terpolymers in aqueous solution. Soft Matter9, 3509–3520 (2013).10.1039/c3sm00151b ↗
21. Barthel, M. J., Rinkenauer, A. C., Wagner, M., Mansfeld, U., Hoeppener, S., Czaplewska, J. A., Gottschaldt, M., Träger, A., Schacher, F. H. & Schubert, U. S. Small but powerful: co-assembly of polyether-based triblock terpolymers into sub-30 nm micelles and synergistic effects on cellular interactions. Biomacromolecules15, 2426–2439 (2014).10.1021/bm5002894 ↗
22. Neto, N., Dilauro, C., Castellu, E. & Califano, S. Vibrational spectra and molecular conformation of cyclenes. I. Vibrational assignemnt and valence force field of cyclohexene and cyclohexene-D10. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Spectr.A23, 1763 (1967).10.1016/0584-8539(67)80059-X ↗
23. Nishimura, Y., Tsuboi, M., Sato, T. & Aoki, K. Conformation-sensitive Raman lines of mononucleotides and their use in a structure-analysis of polynucleotides—guanine and cytosine nucleotides. J. Mol. Struct.146, 123–153 (1986).10.1016/0022-2860(86)80288-5 ↗
24. Press, A. T., Ungelenk, L., Rinkenauer, A. C., Gröger, M., Lehmann, F., Mosig, A., Schubert, U. S., Clemens, M. G. & Bauer, M. A new fluorescent dye for cell tracing and mitochondrial imaging in vitro and in vivo. J. Biophoton.9, 888–900 (2015).10.1002/jbio.201500190 ↗
25. Press, A. T., Traeger, A., Pietsch, C., Mosig, A., Wagner, M., Clemens, M. G., Jbeily, N., Koch, N., Gottschaldt, M., Bézière, N., Ermolayev, V., Ntziachristos, V., Popp, J., Kessels, M. M., Qualmann, B., Schubert, U. S. & Bauer, M. Cell type-specific delivery of short interfering RNAs by dye-functionalised theranostic nanoparticles. Nat. Commun.5 (2014).10.1038/ncomms6565 ↗
26. Winter, M. E. N-FINDR: an algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data. Proc. SPIE 3753, Imaging Spectrometry V 3753, 266–275 (1999).10.1117/12.366289 ↗
27. R Development Core Team, RR (Vienna, Austria, 2011).
28. Ryan, C. G., Clayton, E., Griffin, W. L., Sie, S. H. & Cousens, D. R. SNIP, a statistics-sensitive background treatment for the quantitative analysis of PIXE spectra in geoscience applications. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B34, 396–402 (1988).10.1016/0168-583X(88)90063-8 ↗
29. Barthel, M. J., Babiuch, K., Rudolph, T., Vitz, J., Hoepnner, S., Gottschaldt, M., Hager, M. D., Schacher, F. H. & Schubert, U. S. Bis-hydrophilic and functional triblock terpolymers based on polyethers: synthesis and self-assembly in solution. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem.50, 2914–2923 (2012).10.1002/pola.26072 ↗
30. Halacheva, S., Rangelov, S. & Tsvetanov, C. Poly(glycidol)-based analogues to pluronic block copolymers. synthesis and aqueous solution properties. Macromolecules39, 6845–6852 (2006).10.1021/ma061040b ↗
31. Ding, H. M., Tian, W. D. & Ma, Y. Q. Designing nanoparticle translocation through membranes by computer simulations. ACS Nano6, 1230–1238 (2012).10.1021/nn2038862 ↗
32. Ting, C. L. & Wang, Z.-G. Minimum free energy paths for a nanoparticle crossing the lipid membrane. Soft Matter8, 12066–12071 (2012).10.1039/c2sm26377g ↗
33. Leroueil, P. R., Hong, S., Mecke, A., Baker, J. R., Orr, B. G. & Banaszak Holl, M. M. Nanoparticle interaction with biological membranes: does nanotechnology present a janus face? Acc. Chem. Res.40, 335–342 (2007).10.1021/ar600012y ↗
34. Betthausen, E., Drechsler, M., Förtsch, M., Schacher, F. H. & Müller, A. H. E. Dual stimuli-responsive multicompartment micelles from triblock terpolymers with tunable hydrophilicity. Soft Matter7, 8880–8891 (2011).10.1039/c1sm05822c ↗
35. Perry, S. W., Norman, J. P., Barbieri, J., Brown, E. B. & Gelbard, H. A. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: a practical usage guide. BioTechniques50, 98–115 (2011).10.2144/000113610 ↗
36. Liu, T., Li, L., Fu, C., Liu, H., Chen, D. & Tang, F. Pathological mechanisms of liver injury caused by continuous intraperitoneal injection of silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials33, 2399–2407 (2012).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.008 ↗
37. Moghimi, S. M., Hunter, A. C. & Andresen, T. L. Factors controlling nanoparticle pharmacokinetics: an integrated analysis and perspective. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.52, 481–503 (2012).10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134623 ↗
38. Owens, D. E. & Peppas, N. A. Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm.307, 93–102 (2006).10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.010 ↗