journal article·2018-04Open access

Metal nanofibrils embedded in long free-standing carbon nanotube fibers with a high critical current density

Hokyun Rho, Min Park, Mina Park, Junbeom Park, Jiyoon Han, Aram Lee, Sukang Bae, Tae-Wook Kim, Jun-Seok Ha, Seung Min Kim, Dong Su Lee, Sang Hyun Lee

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 10· Issue 4

Abstract

With the growth of nanoelectronics, the importance of thermal management in device packaging and the improvement of high-current-carrying interconnects/wires for avoiding the premature failure of devices have been emphasized. The heat and electrical transport properties of the bulk may not be valid in the characterization of a material at the nanometer level, because the phenomena that occur at the interfaces and grain boundaries become dominant. The failure mechanism of bulk metal interconnects has been understood in the context of electromigration; however, in nanoscale materials, the effect of the heat dissipation that occurs at the nanointerfaces may play an important role. Here, we report the preparation of continuous carbon nanotube (CNT)–Cu composite fibers that possess Cu nanofibrillar structures with a high current-carrying capacity. Various-shaped CNT–Cu microfibers with different Cu grain morphologies were produced via Cu electroplating on continuous CNT fibers. Cu fibril structures were embedded in the voids inside the CNT fiber during the early stage of electrodeposition. The temperature-dependent and magnetic field-dependent electrical properties and the ampacity of the produced CNT–Cu microfibers were measured, and the failure mechanism of the fiber was discussed. The interconnection of Cu nanograins on the surface of the individual CNTs contributed to the enhancement in the charge-carrying ability of the fiber. The effective ampacity of the Cu nanofibrils was estimated to be ~1 × 107 A/cm2, which is approximately 50 times larger than the ampacity measured for a bulk Cu microwire. Nanoscale metal fibrils increase the maximum current a spun carbon nanotube fiber can carry before failing, researchers in South Korea demonstrate. Ensuring that components don’t overheat is a crucial consideration when designing electronic devices. High electrical currents can heat and thus damage the wires, or interconnects, that link different parts of the circuit. This is particularly important in nanoelectronics, where the interconnects are narrow. Sang Hyun Lee from the Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Jeonbuk, and colleagues addressed this problem by embedding copper fibrils within continuous carbon nanotube fiber. They compared various fibril shapes to systematically study the electrical and thermal properties at the interface between the copper and the carbon nanotube. The maximum current their composite fibers could tolerate before damage occurred was fifty times higher than for conventional copper microwires. The copper nanofibrils are formed at the void inside the long continuous carbon nanotube (CNT) fiber by electroplating. Electrical conduction through the composite fiber was dominated by the nanofibrils even though their cross-sectional area is much smaller than that of CNTs. The nanofibrils could carry a very high current density due to their bamboo-like structure and the thermal dissipation through CNTs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Tu, K. N., Liu, Y. & Li, M. Effect of Joule heating and current crowding on electromigration in mobile technology. Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 011101 (2017).10.1063/1.4974168 ↗
2. Bai, J. G., Zhang, Z. Z., Calata, J. N. & Lu, G.-Q. Low-temperature sintered nanoscale silver as a novel semiconductor device-metallized substrate interconnect material. IEEE Trans. Compon. Pack. Manuf. Technol. 29, 589–593 (2006).10.1109/TCAPT.2005.853167 ↗
3. Weitzel, C. E. et al. Silicon carbide high-power devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 43, 1732–1741 (1996).10.1109/16.536819 ↗
4. Moore, A. L. & Shi, L. Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics. Mater. Today 17, 163–174 (2014).10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.003 ↗
5. van Roosmalen, A. J. & Zhang, G. Q. Reliability challenges in the nanoelectronics era. Microelectron. Reliab. 46, 1403–1414 (2006).10.1016/j.microrel.2006.07.011 ↗
6. Varesi, J. & Majumdar, A. Scanning Joule expansion microscopy at nanometer scales. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 37–39 (1998).10.1063/1.120638 ↗
7. Roy, A. & Tan, C. M. Very high current density package level electromigration test for copper interconnects. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 093707 (2008).10.1063/1.2917065 ↗
8. Baughman, R. H., Zakhidov, A. A. & de Heer, W. A. Carbon nanotubes—the route toward applications. Science 297, 787–792 (2002).10.1126/science.1060928 ↗
9. Allen, M. J., Tung, V. C. & Kaner, R. B. Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem. Rev. 110, 132–145 (2010).10.1021/cr900070d ↗
10. Subramaniam, C. et al. One hundred fold increase in current carrying capacity in a carbon nanotube-copper composite. Nat. Commun. 4, 2202 (2013).10.1038/ncomms3202 ↗
11. Xu, G. et al. Continous electrodeposition for lightweight, highly conducting and strong carbon nanotube-copper composite fibers. Nanoscale 3, 4215–4219 (2011).10.1039/c1nr10571j ↗
12. Fang, B. et al. Wrinkle-stabilized metal-graphene hybrid fibers with zero temperature coefficient of resistance. Nanoscale 9, 12178–12188 (2017).10.1039/C7NR04175F ↗
13. Lekawa-Raus, A., Patmore, J., Kurzepa, L., Bulmer, J. & Koziol, K. Electrical properties of carbon nanotube based fibers and their future use in electrical wiring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3661–3682 (2014).10.1002/adfm.201303716 ↗
14. Li, Y.-L., Kinloch, I. A. & Windle, A. H. Direct spinning of carbon nanotube fibers from chemical vapor deposition synthesis. Science 304, 276–278 (2004).10.1126/science.1094982 ↗
15. Yao, Z., Kane, C. L. & Dekker, C. High-field electrical transport in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2941–2944 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2941 ↗
16. Park, J. Y. et al. Electron-phonon scattering in metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 4, 517–520 (2004).10.1021/nl035258c ↗
17. Wei, B. Q., Vajtai, R. & Ajayan, P. M. Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1172–1174 (2001).10.1063/1.1396632 ↗
18. Liao, A. et al. Thermal dissipation and variability in electrical breakdown of carbon nanotube devices. Phys. Rev. B 82, 205406 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.205406 ↗
19. Hu, C. K. et al. Reduced electromigration of Cu wires by surface coating. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1782–1784 (2002).10.1063/1.1504491 ↗
20. Ahn, S. et al. Magnetotransport in iodine-doped single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165426 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165426 ↗
21. Grigorian, L. et al. Reversible intercalation of charged iodine chains into carbon nanotube ropes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5560–5563 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5560 ↗
22. Lee, K. et al. Metallic transport in polyaniline. Nature 441, 65–68 (2006).10.1038/nature04705 ↗
23. Kaiser, A. B., Dusberg, G. & Roth, S. Heterogeneous model for conduction in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1418–1421 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1418 ↗
24. Okram, G. S. & Kaurav, N. Size-dependent resistivity and thermopower of nanocrystalline copper. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 023713 (2011).10.1063/1.3610791 ↗
25. Bid, A., Bora, A. & Raychaudhuri, A. K. Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter ≥15 nm: applicability of Bloch-Gruneisen theorem. Phys. Rev. B 74, 035426 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035426 ↗
26. Piraux, L., Araujo, F. A., Bui, T. N., Otto, M. J. & Issi, J. P. Two-dimensional quantum transport in highly conductive carbon nanotube fibers. Phys. Rev. B 92, 085428 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.085428 ↗
27. Berlincourt, T. G. Hall effect, magnetoresistance, and size effects in copper. Phys. Rev. 112, 381–387 (1958).10.1103/PhysRev.112.381 ↗
28. Oyarzun, S. et al. Transverse magnetoresistance induced by electron-surface scattering on thin gold films: experiment and theory. Appl. Surf. Sci. 289, 167–172 (2014).10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.128 ↗
29. Niewczas, M. & Bian, Q. Influence of dislocation microstructure on low temperature magnetoresistance in copper single- and polycrystals. Mater. Des. 96, 203–216 (2016).10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.009 ↗
30. Lloyd, J. R. & Clement, J. J. Electromigration in copper conductors. Thin Solid Films 262, 135–141 (1995).10.1016/0040-6090(94)05806-7 ↗
31. Collins, P. G., Arnold, M. S. & Avouris, P. Engineering carbon nanotubes and nanotube circuits using electrical breakdown. Science 292, 706–709 (2001).10.1126/science.1058782 ↗
32. Santini, C. A. et al. A study of Joule heating-induced breakdown of carbon nanotube interconnects. Nanotechnology 22, 395202 (2011).10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395202 ↗
33. Kim, P., Shi, L., Majumdar, A. & McEuen, P. L. Thermal transport measurements of individual multiwalled nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 215502 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.215502 ↗
34. Koper, O. & Winecki, S. 8 specific heats and melting points of nanocrystalline materials. Nanoscale Materials in Chemistry. (Wiley, New York, NY, 2001).