journal article·2020-12Open access

Very sharp diffraction peak in nonglass-forming liquid with the formation of distorted tetraclusters

Chihiro Koyama, Shuta Tahara, Shinji Kohara, Yohei Onodera, Didrik R. Småbråten, Sverre M. Selbach, Jaakko Akola, Takehiko Ishikawa, Atsunobu Masuno, Akitoshi Mizuno, Junpei T. Okada, Yuki Watanabe, Yui Nakata, Koji Ohara, Haruka Tamaru, Hirohisa Oda, Ippei Obayashi, Yasuyuki Hiraoka, Osami Sakata

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the liquid structure provides information that is crucial to uncovering the nature of the glass-liquid transition. We apply an aerodynamic levitation technique and high-energy X-rays to liquid (l)-Er2O3 to discover its structure. The sample densities are measured by electrostatic levitation at the International Space Station. Liquid Er2O3 displays a very sharp diffraction peak (principal peak). Applying a combined reverse Monte Carlo – molecular dynamics approach, the simulations produce an Er–O coordination number of 6.1, which is comparable to that of another nonglass-forming liquid, l-ZrO2. The atomic structure of l-Er2O3 comprises distorted OEr4 tetraclusters in nearly linear arrangements, as manifested by a prominent peak observed at ~180° in the Er–O–Er bond angle distribution. This structural feature gives rise to long periodicity corresponding to the sharp principal peak in the X-ray diffraction data. A persistent homology analysis suggests that l-Er2O3 is homologically similar to the crystalline phase. Moreover, electronic structure calculations show that l-Er2O3 has a modest band gap of 0.6 eV that is significantly reduced from the crystalline phase due to the tetracluster distortions. The estimated viscosity is very low above the melting point for l-ZrO2, and the material can be described as an extremely fragile liquid.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Material Dynamics and Properties · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Zachariasen, W. H. The atomic arrangement in glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54, 3841–3851 (1932).10.1021/ja01349a006 ↗
2. Sun, K.-H. Fundamental condition of glass formation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 30, 277–281 (1947).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1947.tb19654.x ↗
3. Angell, C. A. Formation of glasses from liquids and biopolymers. Science 267, 1924–1935 (1995).10.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
4. Greaves, G. N. & Sen, S. Inorganic glasses, glass-forming liquids and amorphizing solids. Adv. Phys. 56, 1–116 (2007).10.1080/00018730601147426 ↗
5. Salmon, P. S. & Zeidler, A. Identifying and characterising the different structural length scales in liquids and glasses: an experimental approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 15286–15308 (2013).10.1039/c3cp51741a ↗
6. Price, D. L. High-Temperature Levitated Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2010).10.1017/CBO9780511730306 ↗
7. Ansell, S. et al. Structure of liquid aluminum oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 464–466 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.464 ↗
8. Landron, C. et al. Liquid alumina: detailed atomic coordination determined from neutron diffraction data using empirical potential structure refinement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4839–4842 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4839 ↗
9. Krishnan, S. et al. Structure of normal and supercooled liquid aluminum oxide. Chem. Mater. 17, 2662–2666 (2005).10.1021/cm050254p ↗
10. Shi, C. et al. The structure of amorphous and deeply supercooled liquid alumina. Front. Mater. 6, 38 (2019).10.3389/fmats.2019.00038 ↗
11. Skinner, L. B. et al. Joint diffraction and modeling approach to the structure of liquid alumina. Phys. Rev. B 87, 024201 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.024201 ↗
12. Jahn, S. & Madden, P. A. Structure and dynamics in liquid alumina: simulations with an ab initio interaction potential. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 353, 3500–3504 (2007).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.05.104 ↗
13. Vashishta, P., Kalia, R. K., Nakano, A. & Rino, J. P. Interaction potentials for alumina and molecular dynamics simulations of amorphous and liquid alumina. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 083504 (2008).10.1063/1.2901171 ↗
14. Skinner, L. B. et al. Molten uranium dioxide structure and dynamics. Science 346, 984–987 (2014).10.1126/science.1259709 ↗
15. Alderman, O. L. G. et al. Corium lavas: structure and properties of molten UO2-ZrO2 under meltdown conditions. Sci. Rep. 8, 2434 (2018).
16. Hong, Q. J. et al. Combined computational and experimental investigation of high temperature thermodynamics and structure of cubic ZrO2 and HfO2. Sci. Rep. 8, 14962 (2018).
17. Skinner, L. B. et al. Low cation coordination in oxide melts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 157801 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.157801 ↗
18. Kohara, S. et al. Atomic and electronic structures of an extremely fragile liquid. Nat. Commun. 5, 5892 (2014).10.1038/ncomms6892 ↗
19. Tamaru, H. et al. Status of the electrostatic levitation furnace (ELF) in the ISS-KIBO. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 30, 643–651 (2018).10.1007/s12217-018-9631-8 ↗
20. Kohara, S. et al. Synchrotron X-ray scattering measurements of disordered materials. Z. Phys. Chem. 230, 339–368 (2016).10.1515/zpch-2015-0654 ↗
21. Kohara, S., Ohara, K., Ishikawa, T., Tamaru, H. & Weber, R. Investigation of structure and dynamics in disordered materials using containerless techniques with in-situ quantum beam and thermophysical property measurements. Quantum Beam Sci. 2, 5 (2018).10.3390/qubs2010005 ↗
22. Kohara, S. et al. Structural studies of disordered materials using high-energy x-ray diffraction from ambient to extreme conditions. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 19, 506101 (2007).10.1088/0953-8984/19/50/506101 ↗
23. Faber, T. E. & Ziman, J. M. A theory of the electrical properties of liquid metals. Philos. Mag. 11, 153–173 (1965).10.1080/14786436508211931 ↗
24. Greben, O., Jóvári, P., Temleitner, L. & Pusztai, L. A new version of the RMC++ Reverse monte carlo programme, aimed at investigating the structure of covalent glasses. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 9, 3021–3027 (2007).
25. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
26. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
27. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
29. Krukau, A. V., Vydrov, O. A., Izmaylov, A. F. & Scuseria, G. E. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006).10.1063/1.2404663 ↗
30. Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A. & Jónsson, H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 36, 354–360 (2006).10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
31. Sanville, E., Kenny, S. D., Smith, R. & Henkelman, G. Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 899–908 (2007).10.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
32. Tang, W., Sanville, E. & Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 084204 (2009).10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
33. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).10.1063/1.447334 ↗
34. Hiraoka, Y. et al. Hierarchical structures of amorphous solids characterized by persistent homology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7035–7040 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1520877113 ↗
35. https://www.wpi-aimr.tohoku.ac.jp/hiraoka_labo/homcloud/index.en.html
36. Aksay, I. A., Pask, J. A. & Davis, R. F. Densities of SiO2-Al2O3 melts. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62, 332–336 (1979).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19071.x ↗
37. Paradis, P. F., Ishikawa, T., Saita, Y. & Yoda, S. Non-contact thermophysical property measurements of liquid and undercooled alumina. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1496–1500 (2004).10.1143/JJAP.43.1496 ↗
38. Mei, Q., Benmore, C. J. & Weber, J. K. R. Structure of liquid SiO2: a measurement by high-energy x-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 057802 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057802 ↗
39. Salmon, P. S., Martin, R. A., Mason, P. E. & Cuello, G. J. Topological versus chemical ordering in network glasses at intermediate and extended length scales. Nature 435, 75–78 (2005).10.1038/nature03475 ↗
40. Salmon, P. S. Magma under Pressure: Advances in High-Pressure Experiments on Structure and Properties of Melts (Ed. Kono, Y. & Sanloup, C.) pp. 347 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2018).
41. Shannon, R. D. & Prewitt, C. T.Effective ionic radii in oxides and fluorides. Acta Cryst. B25, 925–946 (1969).10.1107/S0567740869003220 ↗
42. Onodera, Y. et al. Understanding diffraction patterns of glassy, liquid and amorphous materials via persistent homology analyses. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn 127, 853–863 (2019).10.2109/jcersj2.19143 ↗
43. Saiki, A., Ishizawa, N., Mizutani, N. & Kato, M. Structural change of C-rare earth sesquioxides Yb2O3 and Er2O3 as a function of temperature. Yogyo Kyokai Shi 93, 649–654 (1985).10.2109/jcersj1950.93.1082_649 ↗
44. Bhatia, A. B. & Thornton, D. E. Structural aspects of the electrical resistivity of binary alloys. Phys. Rev. B 4, 3004–3012 (1971).10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2325 ↗
45. Kohara, S. et al. Relationship between topological order and glass forming ability in densely packed enstatite and forsterite composition glasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14780–14785 (2011).10.1073/pnas.1104692108 ↗
46. Akola, J. et al. Network topology for the formation of solvated electrons in binary CaO–Al2O3 composition glasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10129–10134 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1300908110 ↗