journal article·2019-12Open access

In situ-grown compressed NiCo2S4 barrier layer for efficient and durable polysulfide entrapment

Shaozhuan Huang, Ye Wang, Junping Hu, Yew Von Lim, Dezhi Kong, Lu Guo, Zongkui Kou, Yaxin Chen, Hui Ying Yang

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Modifying a polypropylene (PP) separator with a polysulfide barrier layer can improve the cycling performance of lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. However, conventional slurry-coating- and vacuum-filtration-designed barriers usually show poor particle connection and require extra binder. Herein, we propose a facile in situ growth method and a subsequent compression strategy to design multifunctional NiCo2S4 (NiCoS) nanosheet arrays on a PP membrane for high-performance Li–S batteries. The in situ grown NiCoS nanosheet arrays are interconnected, conductive and closely adhered to the PP membrane without using any binder. After mechanical compression treatment, the overall NiCoS film is compacted, lightweight (0.148 mg cm−2) and ultrathin (0.8 μm). Density functional theory calculations combined with adsorption and diffusion tests prove that the NiCoS nanosheets have highly efficient physical/chemical entrapping capabilities for preventing polysulfide shuttling. Moreover, in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy demonstrated that the NiCoS barrier could efficiently suppress polysulfide diffusion and concurrently facilitate redox reactions. When applying this multifunctional separator, a sulfur/carbon nanotube (S/CNT) cathode with high sulfur content (75 wt%) delivers significantly improved long-term cycling performance, with 0.056% capacity decay per cycle over 500 cycles. This work opens up new opportunities to design multifunctional separators by an in situ growth strategy for high-performance Li–S batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Armand, M. & Tarascon, J.-M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652 (2008).10.1038/451652a ↗
2. Huang, S. et al. Rationally engineered amorphous TiOx/Si/TiOx nanomembrane as an anode material for high energy lithium ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 12, 23–29 (2018).10.1016/j.ensm.2017.11.010 ↗
3. Scrosati, B., Hassoun, J. & Sun, Y.-K. Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3287–3295 (2011).10.1039/c1ee01388b ↗
4. Peng, H.-J., Huang, J.-Q. & Zhang, Q. A review of flexible lithium–sulfur and analogous alkali metal–chalcogen rechargeable batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5237–5288 (2017).10.1039/C7CS00139H ↗
5. Seh, Z. W., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q. & Cui, Y. Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 5605–5634 (2016).10.1039/C5CS00410A ↗
6. Chen, W. et al. A new hydrophilic binder enabling strongly anchoring polysulfides for high‐performance sulfur electrodes in lithium‐sulfur battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702889 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201702889 ↗
7. Zhao, Q. et al. Three-dimensional carbon current collector promises small sulfur molecule cathode with high areal loading for lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 10882–10889 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b00225 ↗
8. Abbas, S. A. et al. Modified separator performing dual physical/chemical roles to inhibit polysulfide shuttle resulting in ultrastable Li–S batteries. ACS Nano 11, 12436–12445 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b06478 ↗
9. Sahore, R. et al. Design principles for optimum performance of porous carbons in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600134 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201600134 ↗
10. Zhu, Q. et al. Ultra-microporous carbons encapsulate small sulfur molecules for high performance lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy 33, 402–409 (2017).10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.060 ↗
11. Mi, K. et al. Sole chemical confinement of polysulfides on nonporous nitrogen/oxygen dual‐doped carbon at the kilogram scale for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604265 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201604265 ↗
12. Huang, S. et al. Regulating the polysulfide redox conversion by iron phosphide nanocrystals for high-rate and ultrastable lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy 51, 340–348 (2018).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.052 ↗
13. Zhao, Q., Zhu, Q., Miao, J., Zhang, P. & Xu, B. 2D MXene nanosheets enable small-sulfur electrodes to be flexible for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 11, 8442–8448 (2019).10.1039/C8NR09653H ↗
14. Ghazi, Z. A. et al. MoS2/celgard separator as efficient polysulfide barrier for long‐life lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606817 (2017).10.1002/adma.201606817 ↗
15. Huang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q. & Wei, F. Multi-functional separator/interlayer system for high-stable lithium-sulfur batteries: progress and prospects. Energy Storage Mater. 1, 127–145 (2015).10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.008 ↗
16. Pei, F. et al. A two-dimensional porous carbon-modified separator for high-energy-density Li-S batteries. Joule 2, 323–336 (2017).10.1016/j.joule.2017.12.003 ↗
17. Yao, H. et al. Improved lithium–sulfur batteries with a conductive coating on the separator to prevent the accumulation of inactive S-related species at the cathode–separator interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3381–3390 (2014).10.1039/C4EE01377H ↗
18. Zhou, T. et al. Twinborn TiO2–TiN heterostructures enabling smooth trapping–diffusion–conversion of polysulfides towards ultralong life lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1694–1703 (2017).10.1039/C7EE01430A ↗
19. Bai, S., Liu, X., Zhu, K., Wu, S. & Zhou, H. Metal–organic framework-based separator for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16094 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.94 ↗
20. Jeong, Y. C., Kim, J. H., Nam, S., Park, C. R. & Yang, S. J. Rational design of nanostructured functional interlayer/separator for advanced Li-S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707411 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201707411 ↗
21. Xiao, J., Wan, L., Yang, S., Xiao, F. & Wang, S. Design hierarchical electrodes with highly conductive NiCo2S4 nanotube arrays grown on carbon fiber paper for high-performance pseudocapacitors. Nano Lett. 14, 831–838 (2014).10.1021/nl404199v ↗
22. Xia, C., Li, P., Gandi, A. N., Schwingenschlögl, U. & Alshareef, H. N. Is NiCo2S4 really a semiconductor? Chem. Mater. 27, 6482–6485 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01843 ↗
23. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
24. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Self-interaction correction to density functional approximation for many electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. Wang, L., Maxisch, T. & Ceder, G. Oxidation energies of transition metal oxides within the GGA+ U framework. Phys. Rev. B 73, 195107 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.195107 ↗
26. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
27. Vayssieres, L., Beermann, N., Lindquist, S.-E. & Hagfeldt, A. Controlled aqueous chemical growth of oriented three-dimensional crystalline nanorod arrays: application to iron (III) oxides. Chem. Mater. 13, 233–235 (2001).10.1021/cm001202x ↗
28. Liu, Z., Fan, T. & Zhang, D. Synthesis of biomorphous nickel oxide from a pinewood template and investigation on a hierarchical porous structure. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 662–665 (2006).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00741.x ↗
29. Zhou, G. et al. A flexible sulfur‐graphene‐polypropylene separator integrated electrode for advanced Li–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 641–647 (2015).10.1002/adma.201404210 ↗
30. Dong, Y. et al. All-MXene-based integrated electrode constructed by Ti3C2 nanoribbon framework host and nanosheet interlayer for high-energy-density Li–S batteries. ACS Nano 12, 2381–2388 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.7b07672 ↗
31. Huang, J.-Q. et al. Permselective graphene oxide membrane for highly stable and anti-self-discharge lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 9, 3002–3011 (2015).10.1021/nn507178a ↗
32. Zhou, G. in Design, Fabrication and Electrochemical Performance of Nanostructured Carbon Based Materials for High-Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries 75–94 (Springer, 2017).10.1007/978-981-10-3406-0_5 ↗
33. He, J., Luo, L., Chen, Y. & Manthiram, A. Yolk–shelled C@Fe3O4 nanoboxes as efficient sulfur hosts for high‐performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702707 (2017).10.1002/adma.201702707 ↗
34. Liang, X. et al. A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Commun. 6, 5682 (2015).10.1038/ncomms6682 ↗
35. Zhong, Y. et al. Surface chemistry in cobalt phosphide-stabilized lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1455–1459 (2018).10.1021/jacs.7b11434 ↗
36. Pang, Q., Kundu, D. & Nazar, L. F. A graphene-like metallic cathode host for long-life and high-loading lithium–sulfur batteries. Mater. Horiz. 3, 130–136 (2016).10.1039/C5MH00246J ↗
37. Sun, J. et al. Entrapment of polysulfides by a black‐phosphorus‐modified separator for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 28, 9797–9803 (2016).10.1002/adma.201602172 ↗
38. Huang, S. et al. Mechanism investigation of high-performance Li-polysulfide batteries enabled by tungsten disulfide nanopetals. ACS Nano 12, 9504–9512 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b04857 ↗
39. Manthiram, A., Yu, X. & Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16103 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
40. Li, W. et al. The synergetic effect of lithium polysulfide and lithium nitrate to prevent lithium dendrite growth. Nat. Commun. 6, 7436 (2015).10.1038/ncomms8436 ↗