The biotransformation of graphene oxide in lung fluids significantly alters its inherent properties and bioactivities toward immune cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Engineered nanomaterials (such as graphene oxide, GO) have shown great potential in biomedical applications as therapeutic and imaging agents. However, little is known about their potential transformations in biological settings, which may alter their physicochemical properties and consequently hinder their biomedical applications. Here, we show that GO undergoes a significant physicochemical transformation in two simulated human lung fluids–Gamble’s solution and artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF), as the organic acids (e.g., citrate and acetate) in the lung fluids cause the reduction of GO, which is mainly due to the conversion of epoxy and carbonyl groups to phenolic groups. This biotransformation markedly inhibits the endocytosis of GO by scavenging macrophages. Notably, the alterations that occur in Gamble’s solution enhance the layer-by-layer aggregation of GO, resulting in the precipitation of GO and a reduction in its interaction with cells, whereas the changes that occur in ALF lead to edge-to-edge aggregation of GO, thereby enhancing the adhesion of large sheet-like GO aggregates on the plasma membrane without cellular uptake. The varied interaction mechanisms with macrophages eventually induce different proinflammatory reactions. Experiments conducted in mice corroborated the morphological alterations of GO in a realistic lung microenvironment. Overall, the findings suggest that the biotransformation of nanomaterials may significantly alter their inherent properties and therefore affect their biosafety, such as the clearance of “worn-out” nanomaterials by immune cells, giving rise to potentially long-term side effects at the accumulation sites. Graphene-oxide particles inserted into the body for biomedical applications such as drug delivery or enhanced imaging can form aggregates over time with possible adverse effects on health, and show researchers in China. After the medical objectives have been achieved, the nanoparticles often remain inside the human body, but it is unclear what happens to them after long time periods in a biological environment. Sijin Liu from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, Wei Chen from Nankai University in Tianjin, and their colleagues show that graphene-oxide nanoparticles undergo a physicochemical transformation in simulated human lung fluids, aggregating to form larger particles. This reduces their interaction with cells and inhibits cellular uptake, and can induce proinflammatory reactions. The results highlight the need to consider the biosafety of nanomaterials and their potential long-term side effects. GO can undergo significant physicochemical transformation in two simulated lung fluids–Gamble’s solution and artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF), as the organic acids in lung fluids cause reduction of GO. Biotransformation markedly inhibits the endocytosis of GO by scavenging macrophages. Notably, alterations in Gamble’s solution enhance the aggregation of GO in a layer-to-layer manner, resulting in GO precipitation and reduced interaction with cells, whereas changes in ALF lead to edge-to-edge aggregation of GO, enhancing the adhesion of large sheet-like GO aggregates on plasma membrane without cellular uptake.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Dostert, C. et al. Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science 320, 674–677 (2008).10.1126/science.1156995 ↗
2. Ghebre, Y. T. & Raghu, G. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: novel concepts of proton pump inhibitors as antifibrotic drugs. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 193, 1345–1352 (2016).10.1164/rccm.201512-2316PP ↗
3. Zhang, L., Xia, J., Zhao, Q., Liu, L. & Zhang, Z. Functional graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled loading and targeted delivery of mixed anticancer drugs. Small 6, 537–544 (2010).10.1002/smll.200901680 ↗
4. Hong, H. et al. In vivo targeting and imaging of tumor vasculature with radiolabeled, antibody-conjugated nano-graphene. ACS Nano 6, 2361–2370 (2012).10.1021/nn204625e ↗
5. Li, Z. et al. Graphene oxide/Ag nanoparticles cooperated with simvastatin as a high sensitive X-ray computed tomography imaging agent for diagnosis of renal dysfunctions. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1700413 (2017).10.1002/adhm.201700413 ↗
6. Zhu, J. et al. Graphene oxide induced perturbation to plasma membrane and cytoskeletal meshwork sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. ACS Nano 11, 2637–2651 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.6b07311 ↗
7. Yin, T. et al. In vivo high-efficiency targeted photodynamic therapy of ultra-small Fe3O4@polymer-NPO/PEG-Glc@Ce6 nanoprobes based on small size effect. NPG Asia Mater. 9, e383 (2017).10.1038/am.2017.68 ↗
8. Jin, Y. et al. Biodegradable, multifunctional DNAzyme nanoflowers for enhanced cancer therapy. NPG Asia Mater. 9, e365 (2017).10.1038/am.2017.34 ↗
9. Ma, J. et al. Crucial role of lateral size for graphene oxide in activating macrophages and stimulating pro-inflammatory responses in cells and animals. ACS Nano 9, 10498–10515 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b04751 ↗
10. Ma, J. et al. Carbon nanotubes stimulate synovial inflammation by inducing systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nanoscale 8, 18070–18086 (2016).10.1039/C6NR06041B ↗
11. Mühlfeld, C. et al. Interactions of nanoparticles with pulmonary structures and cellular responses. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 294, 817–829 (2008).10.1152/ajplung.00442.2007 ↗
12. Hu, Q., Bai, X., Hu, G. & Zuo, Y. Y. Unveiling the molecular structure of pulmonary surfactant corona on nanoparticles. ACS Nano 11, 6832–6842 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b01873 ↗
13. Chua, C. & Pumera, M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: a synthetic chemistry viewpoint. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 291–312 (2014).10.1039/C3CS60303B ↗
14. Dong, L. et al. Tuning magnetic property and autophagic response for self-assembled Ni-Co alloy nanocrystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 5930–5940 (2013).10.1002/adfm.201203767 ↗
15. Fan, Z. et al. Facile synthesis of graphene nanosheets via Fe reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. ACS Nano 5, 191–198 (2011).10.1021/nn102339t ↗
16. Shin, H.-J. et al. Efficient reduction of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its effect on electrical conductance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1987–1992 (2009).10.1002/adfm.200900167 ↗
17. Stankovich, S. et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon NY 45, 1558–1565 (2007).10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
18. Li, M., Cushing, S. K., Zhou, X., Guo, S. & Wu, N. Fingerprinting photoluminescence of functional groups in graphene oxide. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 23374–23379 (2012).10.1039/c2jm35417a ↗
19. Gómez-Navarro, C. et al. Atomic structure of reduced graphene oxide. Nano Lett. 10, 1144–1148 (2010).10.1021/nl9031617 ↗
20. Liu, S. et al. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5, 6971–6980 (2011).10.1021/nn202451x ↗
21. Kurapati, R. et al. Dispersibility-dependent biodegradation of graphene oxide by myeloperoxidase. Small 11, 3985–3994 (2015).10.1002/smll.201500038 ↗
22. Kotchey, G. P. et al. The enzymatic oxidation of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 5, 2098–2108 (2011).10.1021/nn103265h ↗
23. Hu, X., Li, D. & Mu, L. Biotransformation of graphene oxide nanosheets in blood plasma affects their interactions with cells. Environ. Sci. 4, 1569–1578 (2017).
24. Girish, C. M., Sasidharan, A., Gowd, G. S., Nair, S. & Koyakutty, M. Confocal raman imaging study showing macrophage mediated biodegradation of graphene in vivo. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 1489–1500 (2013).10.1002/adhm.201200489 ↗
25. Bhattacharya, K. et al. Biological interactions of carbon-based nanomaterials: from coronation to degradation. Nanomedicine 12, 333–351 (2016).10.1016/j.nano.2015.11.011 ↗
26. Zhang, Z. et al. Sodium citrate: a universal reducing agent for reduction/decoration of graphene oxide with Au nanoparticles. Nano Res. 4, 599–611 (2011).10.1007/s12274-011-0116-y ↗
27. Agharkar, M., Kochrekar, S., Hidouri, S. & Azeez, M. A. Trends in green reduction of graphene oxides, issues and challenges: a review. Mater. Res. Bull. 59, 323–328 (2014).10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.07.051 ↗
28. Ji, X. et al. Size control of gold nanocrystals in citrate reduction: the third role of citrate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 13939–13948 (2007).10.1021/ja074447k ↗
29. Kumar, S., Gandhi, K. S. & Kumar, R. Modeling of formation of gold nanoparticles by citrate method. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 3128–3136 (2007).10.1021/ie060672j ↗
30. Zhang, J. et al. Reduction of graphene oxide via L-ascorbic acid. Chem. Commun. 46, 1112–1114 (2010).10.1039/B917705A ↗
31. Clayden, J., Greeves, N. & Warren, S. Organic Chemistry. 2 ed., (OUP, Oxford, 2012).10.1093/hesc/9780199270293.001.0001 ↗
32. Chen, Y. et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation variations upon exposure to engineered nanomaterials and their implications in nanosafety assessment. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604580 (2017).10.1002/adma.201604580 ↗
33. Qu, G. et al. Graphene oxide induces toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent necrosis in macrophages. ACS Nano 7, 5732–5745 (2013).10.1021/nn402330b ↗
34. Xu, M. et al. Improved in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of graphene oxide through surface modification: poly(acrylic acid)-functionalization is superior to PEGylation. ACS Nano 10, 3267–3281 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.6b00539 ↗
35. Chowdhury, I., Mansukhani, N. D., Guiney, L. M., Hersam, M. C. & Bouchard, D. Aggregation and stability of reduced graphene oxide: complex roles of divalent cations, pH, and natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 10886–10893 (2015).10.1021/acs.est.5b01866 ↗
36. Qi, Y., Xia, T., Li, Y., Duan, L. & Chen, W. Colloidal stability of reduced graphene oxide materials prepared using different reducing agents. Environ. Sci. 3, 1062–1071 (2016).
37. Park, S. et al. Graphene oxide papers modified by divalent ions-enhancing mechanical properties via chemical cross-linking. ACS Nano 2, 572–578 (2008).10.1021/nn700349a ↗
38. Wu, L. et al. Aggregation kinetics of graphene oxides in aqueous solutions: experiments, mechanisms, and modeling. Langmuir 29, 15174–15181 (2013).10.1021/la404134x ↗
39. Cote, L. J., Kim, F. & Huang, J. Langmuir-Blodgett assembly of graphite oxide single layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1043–1049 (2009).10.1021/ja806262m ↗
40. Champion, J. A. & Mitragotri, S. Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4930–4934 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0600997103 ↗
41. Doshi, N. & Mitragotri, S. Macrophages recognize size and shape of their targets. PLoS ONE 5, e10051 (2010).10.1371/journal.pone.0010051 ↗