journal article·2018-08Open access

Ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles with ultrahigh loading capacity of camptothecin and floxuridine for enhancing tumor accumulation and combined chemotherapeutic efficacy

Xiaolong Liang, Yunxue Xu, Chuang Gao, Yiming Zhou, Nisi Zhang, Zhifei Dai

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 10· Issue 8

Abstract

In addition to the well-known use of microbubbles (MBs) as powerful contrast agents for general tissue delineation and perfusion in ultrasound (US) imaging, US-targeted MB destruction (UTMD) has been demonstrated to be an emerging technique for noninvasive drug delivery to tumor sites. However, the very limited drug-loading capacity of conventional MBs remains a great obstacle to their application as an efficacious cancer therapy. In this study, an amphiphilic Janus camptothecin-floxuridine (CF) conjugate was synthesized to engineer CF MBs with ultrahigh drug-loading contents (up to 56.7 ± 2.3%). CF MBs were proven to be an excellent contrast agent to enhance US imaging for identifying the location and size of tumors. Upon local US exposure to burst CF MBs under the guidance of contrast-enhanced US imaging, successful conversion of CF MBs into CF NPs in situ resulted in ~14 times higher drug accumulation of the CF conjugate via the sonoporation effect than that of CF NPs and CF MBs without US. After CF was internalized by tumor cells and its ester bond was hydrolyzed, camptothecin (CPT) and floxuridine (FUDR) were released at an exact 1:1 ratio to achieve coordinated pharmacokinetics, leading to significantly higher tumor growth inhibition in murine tumor models of CF MBs combined with US (~72.4%) than CF NPs (~54.1%) and liposomes loaded with CPT and FUDR (~21.6%). Overall, these results demonstrate that the combination of CF MBs with US is a powerful strategy for remarkably enhancing the combined chemotherapeutic efficacy and greatly reducing the undesirable side effects. Tiny gas-filled bubbles that help microscopes spot tumors can also deliver drug nanoparticles to tumor cells. Microbubbles have resonant properties that enhance the quality of ultrasonic images, and are safe to introduce into the bloodstream. Zhifei Dai from Peking University in Beijing, China, and co-workers have now developed a synthetic procedure that combines two promising anticancer drugs in a complex that spontaneously forms microbubbles following mechanical agitation with a fluorinated gas. Ultrasound imaging demonstrated that these microbubbles could be tracked as they circulated to tumor sites in mice. Then, using minute-long ultrasound applications, the team burst the bubbles and created drug nanoparticles. Therapeutic studies revealed that the ultrasound waves facilitated drug movement across tumor cell membranes, leading to lower rates of tumor growth compared to intravenous injections of the nanoparticles. Amphiphilic Janus camptothecin-floxuridine (CF) conjugate was synthesized for engineering CF microbubbles (CF MBs) with ultrahigh drug-loading contents. CF MBs exhibited excellent capability to enhance ultrasound (US) imaging for identifying the location and size of the tumors, while it can be efficiently converted into CF NPs upon sonication, conducing to remarkably high drug tumor accumulation via sonoporation effect. Both camptothecin (CPT) and floxuridine (FUDR) could be released at an exact 1:1 ratio in the tumor microenvironment, achieving significantly improved therapeutic efficacy. Overall, the CF MBs combining with US technique will provide a step toward the application of targeted theranostics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Maeda, H., Wu, J., Sawa, T., Matsumura, Y. & Hori, K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J. Control. Release 65, 271–284 (2000).10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5 ↗
2. Bertrand, N., Wu, J., Xu, X., Kamaly, N. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 66, 2–25 (2014).10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.009 ↗
3. Maeda, H. The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv. Enzym. Regul. 41, 189–207 (2001).10.1016/S0065-2571(00)00013-3 ↗
4. Maeda, H. Toward a full understanding of the EPR effect in primary and metastatic tumors as well as issues related to its heterogeneity. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 91, 3–6 (2015).10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.002 ↗
5. Ruoslahti, E., Bhatia, S. N. & Sailor, M. J. Targeting of drugs and nanoparticles to tumors. J. Cell Biol. 188, 759–768 (2010).10.1083/jcb.200910104 ↗
6. Ernsting, M. J., Murakami, M., Roy, A. & Li, S. D. Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles. J. Control. Release 172, 782–794 (2013).10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.013 ↗
7. Dawidczyk, C. M. et al. State-of-the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: lessons learned from FDA-approved nanomedicines. J. Control. Release 187, 133–144 (2014).10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.036 ↗
8. Davis, M. E., Chen, Z. G. & Shin, D. M. Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 771–782 (2008).10.1038/nrd2614 ↗
9. Jain, R. K. Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1, 241–263 (1999).10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.241 ↗
10. Heldin, C. H., Rubin, K., Pietras, K. & Ostman, A. High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 806–813 (2004).10.1038/nrc1456 ↗
11. Park, K. Facing the truth about nanotechnology in drug delivery. ACS Nano 7, 7442–7447 (2013).10.1021/nn404501g ↗
12. Wilhelm, S. et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16014 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 ↗
13. Lammers, T., Kiessling, F., Hennink, W. E. & Storm, G. Drug targeting to tumors: principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress. J. Control. Release 161, 175–187 (2012).10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.063 ↗
14. Boissenot, T., Bordat, A., Fattal, E. & Tsapis, N. Ultrasound-triggered drug delivery for cancer treatment using drug delivery systems: from theoretical considerations to practical applications. J. Control Release 241, 144–163 (2016).10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.09.026 ↗
15. Au, J. L., Yeung, B. Z., Wientjes, M. G., Lu, Z. & Wientjes, M. G. Delivery of cancer therapeutics to extracellular and intracellular targets: determinants, barriers, challenges and opportunities. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 97, 280–301 (2016).10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.002 ↗
16. Tzu-Yin, W., Wilson, K. E., Machtaler, S. & Willmann, J. K. Ultrasound and microbubble guided drug delivery: mechanistic understanding and clinical implications. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 14, 743–752 (2013).
17. Burke, C. W., Alexander, E. T., Timbie, K., Kilbanov, A. L. & Price, R. J. Ultrasound-activated agents comprised of 5FU-bearing nanoparticles bonded to microbubbles inhibit solid tumor growth and improve survival. Mol. Ther. 22, 321–328 (2014).10.1038/mt.2013.259 ↗
18. Yan, F. et al. Paclitaxel-liposome-microbubble complexes as ultrasound-triggered therapeutic drug delivery carriers. J. Control. Release 166, 246–255 (2013).10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.12.025 ↗
19. Escoffre, J. M., Novell, A., Serriere, S., Lecomte, T. & Bouakaz, A. Irinotecan delivery by microbubble-assisted ultrasound: in vitro validation and a pilot preclinical study. Mol. Pharm. 10, 2667–2675 (2013).10.1021/mp400081b ↗
20. Kooiman, K., Vos, H. J., Versluis, M. & de Jong, N. Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 72, 28–48 (2014).10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.003 ↗
21. Faez, T. et al. 20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control 60, 7–20 (2013).10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2533 ↗
22. Liu, H. L., Fan, C. H., Ting, C. Y. & Yeh, C. K. Combining microbubbles and ultrasound for drug delivery to brain tumors: current progress and overview. Theranostics 4, 432–444 (2014).10.7150/thno.8074 ↗
23. Klibanov, A. L., Shevchenko, T. I., Raju, B. I., Seip, R. & Chin, C. T. Ultrasound-triggered release of materials entrapped in microbubble-liposome constructs: a tool for targeted drug delivery. J. Control. Release 148, 13–17 (2010).10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.115 ↗
24. Hernot, S. & Klibanov, A. L. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1153–1166 (2008).10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005 ↗
25. Setyawati, M. I., Tay, C. Y., Bay, B. H. & Leong, D. T. Gold nanoparticles induced endothelial leakiness depends on particle size and endothelial cell origin. ACS Nano 11, 5020–5030 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b01744 ↗
26. Tay, C. Y., Setyawati, M. I. & Leong, D. T. Nanoparticle density: a critical biophysical regulator of endothelial permeability. ACS Nano 11, 2764–2772 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.6b07806 ↗
27. Setyawati, M. I., Mochalin, V. N. & Leong, D. T. Tuning endothelial permeability with functionalized nanodiamonds. ACS Nano 10, 1170–1181 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.5b06487 ↗
28. Setyawati, M. I., Tay, C. Y., Docter, D., Stauber, R. H. & Leong, D. T. Understanding and exploiting nanoparticles’ intimacy with the blood vessel and blood. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8174–8199 (2015).10.1039/C5CS00499C ↗
29. Setyawati, M. I. et al. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials cause endothelial cell leakiness by disrupting the homophilic interaction of VE–cadherin. Nat. Commun. 4, 1673 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2655 ↗
30. Mayer, L. D. et al. Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 1854–1863 (2006).10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0118 ↗
31. Tardi, P. G. et al. Coencapsulation of irinotecan and floxuridine into low cholesterol-containing liposomes that coordinate drug release in vivo. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1768, 678–687 (2007).10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.11.014 ↗
32. Harasym, T. O. et al. Increased preclinical efficacy of irinotecan and floxuridine coencapsulated inside liposomes is associated with tumor delivery of synergistic drug ratios. Oncol. Res. 16, 361–374 (2007).10.3727/000000006783980937 ↗
33. Liang, X. et al. Self-assembly of an amphiphilic Janus camptothecin-floxuridine conjugate into liposome-like nanocapsules for more efficacious combination chemotherapy in cancer. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703135 (2017).10.1002/adma.201703135 ↗
34. Gao, C. et al. Near-infrared cyanine-loaded liposome-like nanocapsules of camptothecin-floxuridine conjugate for enhanced chemophotothermal combination cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 3219–3228 (2018).10.1021/acsami.7b14125 ↗
35. Liang, X., Li, X., Yue, X. & Dai, Z. Conjugation of porphyrin to nanohybrid cerasomes for photodynamic diagnosis and therapy of cancer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50, 11622–11627 (2011).10.1002/anie.201103557 ↗