Asymmetric Janus adhesive tape prepared by interfacial hydrosilylation for wet/dry amphibious adhesion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Janus films with asymmetric properties on opposite sides have been widely used to facilitate energy storage, ion transport, nanofiltration, and responsive bending. However, studies on Janus films rarely involve controlling surface adhesion, either dry or wet adhesion. Herein, we report Janus adhesive tape with an asymmetrically crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) network prepared through an interfacial hydrosilylation strategy, realizing wet/dry amphibious adhesion on various solid surfaces. The lightly crosslinked side of the Janus adhesive tape acts as an adhesive layer with high adhesion, and the highly crosslinked side functions as a supporting layer with high mechanical strength. This Janus adhesive tape with good adhesion and mechanical properties can be dyed different colors and can act as an underwater adhesive and a skin adhesive for wearable electronic devices. This study provides a promising design model for next-generation adhesive materials and related applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Oh, Y.-S. et al. Janus-faced, dual-conductive/chemically active battery separator membranes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 7074–7083 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201602734 ↗
2. Zhang, Z. et al. Bioinspired heterogeneous ion pump membranes: unidirectional selective pumping and controllable gating properties stemming from asymmetric ionic group distribution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1083–1090 (2018).10.1021/jacs.7b11472 ↗
3. Zhang, Z. et al. Ultrathin and ion-selective Janus membranes for high-performance osmotic energy conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8905–8914 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b02794 ↗
4. Liu, S., Wu, C., Hung, W.-S., Lu, X. & Lee, K.-R. One-step constructed ultrathin Janus polyamide nanofilms with opposite charges for highly efficient nanofiltration. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 22988–22996 (2017).10.1039/C7TA07582K ↗
5. Zhang, F. et al. A monolithic hydro/organo macro copolymer actuator synthesized via interfacial copolymerization. NPG Asia Mater. 9, e380 (2017).
6. Zhao, Q. et al. An instant multi-responsive porous polymer actuator driven by solvent molecule sorption. Nat. Commun. 5, 4293–4300 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5293 ↗
7. Zhang, X. et al. Photoactuators and motors based on carbon nanotubes with selective chirality distributions. Nat. Commun. 5, 2983–2990 (2014).10.1038/ncomms3983 ↗
8. Yang, H. C., Hou, J., Chen, V. & Xu, Z. K. Janus membranes: exploring fuality for advanced separation. Angew. Chem. Ed. 55, 13398–13407 (2016).10.1002/anie.201601589 ↗
9. Yang, H. C. et al. Janus membranes: creating asymmetry for energy efficiency. Adv. Mater. 30, e1801495 (2018).
10. Shi, L., Liu, X., Wang, W., Jiang, L. & Wang, S. A self-pumping dressing for draining excessive biofluid around wounds. Adv. Mater. 31, 1804187–1804195 (2018).10.1002/adma.201804187 ↗
11. Zhang, Z. et al. Engineered asymmetric heterogeneous membrane: a concentration-gradient-driven energy harvesting device. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 14765–14772 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b09918 ↗
12. Zhang, Z. et al. Asymmetric multifunctional heterogeneous membranes for pH- and temperature-cooperative smart ion transport modulation. Adv. Mater. 28, 9613–9619 (2016).10.1002/adma.201602758 ↗
13. Yuk, H., Zhang, T., Parada, G. A., Liu, X. & Zhao, X. Skin-inspired hydrogel-elastomer hybrids with robust interfaces and functional microstructures. Nat. Commun. 7, 12028–12038 (2016).10.1038/ncomms12028 ↗
14. Yu, Y. et al. Multifunctional “hydrogel skins” on diverse polymers with arbitrary shapes. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807101–1807109 (2018).10.1002/adma.201807101 ↗
15. Yao, C. et al. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-clay nanocomposite hydrogels with responsive bending property as temperature-controlled manipulators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 2980–2991 (2015).10.1002/adfm.201500420 ↗
16. Ruibal, R. & Ernst, V. The structure of the digital setae of lizards. J. Morphol. 117, 271–293 (1965).10.1002/jmor.1051170302 ↗
17. Geim, A. K. et al. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nat. Mater. 2, 461–463 (2003).10.1038/nmat917 ↗
18. Autumn, K. et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405, 681–685 (2000).10.1038/35015073 ↗
19. Gu, Z., Li, S., Zhang, F. & Wang, S. Understanding surface adhesion in nature: a peeling model. Adv. Sci. 3, 1500327–1500339 (2016).10.1002/advs.201500327 ↗
20. Waite, J. H. & Tanzer, M. L. Polyphenolic substance of mytilus edulis: novel adhesive containing L-dopa and hydroxyproline. Science 212, 1038–1040 (1981).10.1126/science.212.4498.1038 ↗
21. Lee, H., Scherer, N. F. & Messersmith, P. B. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12999–13003 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
22. Maier, G. P., Rapp, M. V., Waite, J. H., Israelachvili, J. N. & Butler, A. Adaptive synergy between catechol and lysine promotes wet adhesion by surface salt displacement. Science 349, 628–632 (2015).10.1126/science.aab0556 ↗
23. Zhang, K., Zhang, F., Song, Y., Fan, J.-B. & Wang, S. Recent progress of mussel-inspired underwater adhesives. Chin. J. Chem. 35, 820–829 (2017).
24. Swain, G. W., Griffith, J. R., Bultman, J. D. & Vincent, H. L. The use of barnacle adhesion measurements for the field evaluation of non‐toxic foul release surfaces. Biofouling 6, 105–114 (1992).10.1080/08927019209386216 ↗
25. Baik, S. et al. A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature 546, 396–400 (2017).10.1038/nature22382 ↗
26. Sitti, M. & Fearing, R. S. Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 17, 1055–1073 (2003).10.1163/156856103322113788 ↗
27. Lee, H. et al. Octopus-inspired smart adhesive pads for transfer printing of semiconducting nanomembranes. Adv. Mater. 28, 7457–7465 (2016).10.1002/adma.201601407 ↗
28. Statz, A. R., Meagher, R. J., Barron, A. E. & Messersmith, P. B. New peptidomimetic polymers for antifouling surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7972–7973 (2005).10.1021/ja0522534 ↗
29. White, J. D. & Wilker, J. J. Underwater bonding with charged polymer mimics of marine mussel adhesive proteins. Macromolecules 44, 5085–5088 (2011).10.1021/ma201044x ↗
30. Matos-Perez, C. R., White, J. D. & Wilker, J. J. Polymer composition and substrate influences on the adhesive bonding of a biomimetic, cross-linking polymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9498–9505 (2012).10.1021/ja303369p ↗
31. Lee, H., Lee, B. P. & Messersmith, P. B. A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature 448, 338–341 (2007).10.1038/nature05968 ↗
32. Ma, Y. et al. Remote control over underwater dynamic attachment/detachment and locomotion. Adv. Mater. 30, 1801595–1801602 (2018).10.1002/adma.201801595 ↗
33. Wang, S. et al. Highly efficient capture of circulating tumor cells by using nanostructured silicon substrates with integrated chaotic micromixers. Angew. Chem. Ed. 50, 3084–3088 (2011).10.1002/anie.201005853 ↗
34. Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 368–373 (2006).10.1038/nature05058 ↗
35. Wang, S., Oh, J. Y., Xu, J., Tran, H. & Bao, Z. Skin-inspired electronics: an emerging paradigm. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1033–1045 (2018).10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00015 ↗
36. Wang, S. et al. Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array. Nature 555, 83–88 (2018).10.1038/nature25494 ↗
37. Trau, M. et al. Microscopic patterning of orientated mesoscopic silica through guided growth. Nature 390, 674–676 (1997).10.1038/37764 ↗
38. Xia, Y. & Whitesides, G. M. Reduction in the size of features of patterned SAMs generated by microcontact printing with mechanical compression of the stamp. Adv. Mater. 7, 471–473 (1995).10.1002/adma.19950070513 ↗
39. Cai, L.-H. et al. Soft poly(dimethylsiloxane) elastomers from architecture-driven entanglement free design. Adv. Mater. 27, 5132–5140 (2015).10.1002/adma.201502771 ↗
40. Eagan, J. M. et al. Combining polyethylene and polypropylene: enhanced performance with PE/iPP multiblock polymers. Science 355, 814–816 (2017).10.1126/science.aah5744 ↗
41. Meyer, E. E., Rosenberg, K. J. & Israelachvili, J. Recent progress in understanding hydrophobic interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15739–15746 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0606422103 ↗
42. Soltannia, B. & Sameoto, D. Strong, reversible underwater adhesion via gecko-inspired hydrophobic fibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 21995–22003 (2014).10.1021/am5075375 ↗
43. Zhou, J., Anim-Danso, E., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y. & Dhinojwala, A. Interfacial water at polyurethane-sapphire interface. Langmuir 31, 12401–12407 (2015).10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03263 ↗
44. Fischer, S. C. L., Kruttwig, K., Bandmann, V., Hensel, R. & Arzt, E. Adhesion and cellular compatibility of silicone-based skin adhesives. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 302, 1600526–1600526 (2017).10.1002/mame.201600526 ↗
45. Gu, Z. et al. Skin adhesives with controlled adhesion by polymer chain mobility. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 1496–1502 (2019).10.1021/acsami.8b18947 ↗
46. Sadtler, K. et al. Clinical translation and immunological response of biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16040–16056 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.40 ↗
47. Kroner, E., Maboudian, R. & Arzt, E. Adhesion characteristics of PDMS surfaces during repeated pull-off force measurements. Adv. Eng. Mater. 12, 398–404 (2010).10.1002/adem.201000090 ↗
48. Yuk, H., Zhang, T., Lin, S., Parada, G. A. & Zhao, X. Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces. Nat. Mater. 15, 190–196 (2016).10.1038/nmat4463 ↗
49. Li, J. et al. Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces. Science 357, 378–381 (2017).10.1126/science.aah6362 ↗