Gecko-inspired chitosan adhesive for tissue repair
Source abstract
Abstract
The advent of nanotechnology has opened the possibility of fabricating nanoscopic pillars on the surface of polymeric films mimicking the Gecko’s foot, in an attempt to increase their adhesive capabilities enhanced by van der Waals forces. However, these forces are considerably weakened in a wet physiological environment. To circumvent this loss in force, current biocompatible adhesives with nanopillars require complex multiple-step fabrication, including an extra layer of adhesive coating to stabilize tissue bonding under physiological conditions. In this report, we describe a simple one-step fabrication process of a single-layer chitosan film that has pillars with base diameter in the range of 100–600 nm and a height of ~70 nm. The nanostructured adhesive is laser-bonded to tissue and does not require pillar coating to enhance bonding in water. In comparison with a ‘flat’ adhesive (without pillars), the nanostructured adhesive bonded significantly stronger to tissue under either stress or pressure. Atomic force spectroscopy also confirmed the superior bonding capability of the nanostructured adhesive. This study demonstrates a one-step fabrication technique to produce a monolayer gecko-inspired adhesive that is biocompatible and bonds effectively to tissue. A gecko-inspired adhesive that retains its adhesion in wet environments and can be easily fabricated has been demonstrated. Gecko-inspired adhesives have strong adhesion due to nanoscale protrusions that maximize the surface area and hence Van der Waals forces, but they tend to lose their sticking power in the wet. Although biocompatible adhesives that are suitable for wet conditions have been produced, they require an extra layer and complex fabrication processes. Now, Antonio Lauto of Western Sydney University in Australia and his co-workers report a single-layer chitosan film with nanoscale pillars that can be fabricated by a simple one-step process involving dry casting. The film bonds strongly to tissue on laser irradiation, making it promising for biomedical applications such as facilitating wound sealing and tissue repair. This study describes a simple one-step fabrication process of a chitosan film that has nanoscale pillars. The adhesive is laser-bonded to tissue and does not require pillar coating to enhance bonding in water. In comparison with a ‘flat’ adhesive without pillars, the nanostructured adhesive bonded significantly stronger to tissue under either stress or pressure. This adhesive combines two mechanisms for tissue bonding: one based on the nanopatterned surface that increases the adhesion strength over short distances (van der Waals and electrostatic interactions) and another based on elastic interaction with polymer chains over much longer distances.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R. & Full, R. J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405, 681–685 (2000).10.1038/35015073 ↗
2. London, F. The general theory of molecular forces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 8b–26 (1937).10.1039/tf937330008b ↗
3. Qu, L., Dai, L., Stone, M., Xia, Z. & Wang, Z. L. Carbon nanotube arrays with strong shear binding-on and easy normal lifting-off. Science 322, 238–242 (2008).10.1126/science.1159503 ↗
4. Bergström, L. Hamaker constants of inorganic materials. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 70, 125–169 (1997).10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00003-1 ↗
5. Vajpayee, S., Jagota, A. & Hui, C.-Y. Adhesion of a fibrillar interface on wet and rough surfaces. J. Adhes. 86, 39–61 (2010).10.1080/00218460903417834 ↗
6. Lee, H., Lee, B. P. & Messersmith, P. B. A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature 448, 338–341 (2007).10.1038/nature05968 ↗
7. Mahdavi, A., Ferreira, L., Sundback, C., Nichol, J. W., Chan, E. P., Carter, D. J., Bettinger, C. J., Patanavanich, S., Chignozha, L., Ben-Joseph, E., Galakatos, A., Pryor, H., Pomerantseva, I., Masiakos, P. T., Faquin, W., Zumbuehl, A., Hong, S., Borenstein, J., Vacanti, J., Langer, R. & Karp, J. M. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2307–2312 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0712117105 ↗
8. Pereira, M. J., Sundback, C. A., Lang, N., Cho, W. K., Pomerantseva, I., Ouyang, B., Tao, S. L., McHugh, K., Mwizerwa, O., Vemula, P. K., Mochel, M. C., Carter, D. J., Borenstein, J. T., Langer, R., Ferreira, L. S., Karp, J. M. & Masiakos, P. T. Combined surface micropatterning and reactive chemistry maximizes tissue adhesion with minimal inflammation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 3, 565–571 (2014).10.1002/adhm.201300264 ↗
9. Gill, I. S., Desai, M. M., Kaouk, J. H., Meraney, A. M., Murphy, D. P., Sung, G. T. & Novick, A. C. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J. Urol. 167, 469–476 (2002).10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69066-9 ↗
10. Ogan, K., Jacomides, L., Saboorian, H., Koeneman, K., Li, Y., Napper, C., Hoopman, J., Pearle, M. S. & Cadeddu, J. A. Sutureless laparoscopic heminephrectomy using laser tissue soldering. J. Endourol. 17, 295–300 (2003).10.1089/089277903322145468 ↗
11. Murray, K. D., Ho, C.-H., Hsia, J.-Y.J. & Little, A. G. The influence of pulmonary staple line reinforcement on air leaks. CHEST 122, 2146 (2002).10.1378/chest.122.6.2146 ↗
12. Downey, D. M., Harre, J. G. & Pratt, J. W. Functional comparison of staple line reinforcements in lung resection. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82, 1880–1883 (2006).10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.079 ↗
13. Lumsden, A. B. & Heyman, E. R. Prospective randomized study evaluating an absorbable cyanoacrylate for use in vascular reconstructions. J. Vasc. Surg. 44, 1002–1009 (2006).10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.039 ↗
14. Hida, K., Yamaguchi, S., Seki, T., Yano, S., Akino, M., Terasaka, S., Uchida, T. & Iwasaki, Y. Nonsuture dural repair using polyglycolic acid mesh and fibrin glue: clinical application to spinal surgery. Surg. Neurol. 65, 136–142 (2006).10.1016/j.surneu.2005.07.059 ↗
15. Cimador, M., Castagnetti, M., Milazzo, M., Sergio, M. & De Grazia, E. Suture materials: do they affect fistula and stricture rates in flap urethroplasties? Urol. Int. 73, 320–324 (2004).10.1159/000081592 ↗
16. Alfieri, S., Carriero, C., Caprino, P., Di Giorgio, A., Sgadari, A., Crucitti, F. & Doglietto, G. B. Avoiding early postoperative complications in liver surgery. A multivariate analysis of 254 patients consecutively observed. Dig. Liver Dis. 33, 341–346 (2001).10.1016/S1590-8658(01)80089-X ↗
17. Lauto, A., Mawad, D., Barton, M., Gupta, A., Piller, S. C. & Hook, J. Photochemical tissue bonding with chitosan adhesive films. Biomed. Eng. Online 9, 47 (2010).10.1186/1475-925X-9-47 ↗
18. Barton, M., Morley, J. W., Stoodley, M. A., Ng, K. S., Piller, S. C., Duong, H., Mawad, D., Mahns, D. A. & Lauto, A. Laser-activated adhesive films for sutureless median nerve anastomosis. J. Biophotonics 6, 938–949 (2013).10.1002/jbio.201300054 ↗
19. Barton, M. J., Morley, J. W., Stoodley, M. A., Shaikh, S., Mahns, D. A. & Lauto, A. Long term recovery of median nerve repair using laser-activated chitosan adhesive films. J. Biophotonics 8, 196–207 (2015).10.1002/jbio.201300129 ↗
20. Lauto, A., Stoodley, M., Barton, M., Morley, J. W., Mahns, D. A., Longo, L. & Mawad, D. Fabrication and application of rose bengal-chitosan films in laser tissue repair. J. Vis. Exp 68 (2012).10.3791/4158 ↗
21. Barton, M. J., Morley, J. W., Mahns, D. A., Mawad, D., Wuhrer, R., Fania, D., Frost, S. J., Loebbe, C. & Lauto, A. Tissue repair strength using chitosan adhesives with different physical-chemical characteristics. J. Biophotonics 7, 948–955 (2014).10.1002/jbio.201300148 ↗
22. del Campo, A. & Arzt, E. Fabrication approaches for generating complex micro-and nanopatterns on polymeric surfaces. Chem. Rev. 108, 911–945 (2008).10.1021/cr050018y ↗
23. Zhiltsova, T. V., Oliveira, M. S. A. & Ferreira, J. A. Integral approach for production of thermoplastics microparts by injection moulding. J. Mater. Sci. 48, 81–94 (2013).10.1007/s10853-012-6669-7 ↗
24. Rivero, S., García, M. A. & Pinotti, A. Physical and chemical treatments on chitosan matrix to modify film properties and kinetics of biodegradation. J. Mater. Phys. Chem. 1, 51–57 (2013).
25. Croisier, F. & Jérôme, C. Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 49, 780–792 (2013).10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.12.009 ↗
26. Landau, L. D., Akhiezer, A. I., Lifshitz, E. M. in General Physics Mechanics and Molecular Physics 1st edn (eds Sykes J. B., Petford A. D. & Petford C. L.) Ch. 97, 285–288 (Pergamon Press Ltd Headinton Hill Hall, Oxford, England, 1967).
27. Chung, C., van Hoof, L., Policova, Z., Beharry, S., Sherman, P. M., Neumann, A. W. & Durie, P. Surface hydrophobicity is increased in the ileum and proximal colon of cystic fibrosis mice. Pediatr. Res. 46, 174–178 (1999).10.1203/00006450-199908000-00008 ↗
28. Bullard, J. W. & Garboczi, E. J. Capillary rise between planar surfaces. Phys. Rev. E. Stat. Nonlin. Soft. Matter. Phys. 79, 011604 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevE.79.011604 ↗
29. Koland, M., Charyulu, R. N., Vijayanarayana, K. & Prabhu, P. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan buccal films of ondansetron hydrochloride. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 1, 164 (2011).10.4103/2230-973X.85967 ↗
30. Costa, I. D. S. M., Abranches, R. P., Garcia, M. T. J. & Pierre, M. B. R. Chitosan-based mucoadhesive films containing 5-aminolevulinic acid for buccal cancer’s treatment. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 140, 266–275 (2014).10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.08.005 ↗
31. Carbognani, A., Tanga, P., Cellino, A., Delbo, M., Mottola, S. & Marchese, E. The representation of asteroid shapes: a test for the inversion of Gaia photometry. Planet. Space Sci. 73, 80–85 (2012).10.1016/j.pss.2011.12.002 ↗
32. Verter, E. E., Gisel, T. E., Yang, P., Johnson, A. J., Redmond, R. W. & Kochevar, I. E. Light-initiated bonding of amniotic membrane to cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 9470–9477 (2011).10.1167/iovs.11-7248 ↗
33. Verweu, H. & Steveninck, J. V. Model studies on photodynamic crosslinking. Photochem. Photobiol. 35, 265–267 (1982).10.1111/j.1751-1097.1982.tb03845.x ↗
34. Shen, H.-R., Spikes, J. D., Kopečková, P. & Kopeček, J. Photodynamic crosslinking of proteins II. Photocrosslinking of a model protein-ribonuclease A. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 35, 213–219 (1996).10.1016/S1011-1344(96)07300-9 ↗
35. Sionkowska, A., Wisniewski, M., Skopinska, J., Kennedy, C. J. & Wess, T. J. Molecular interactions in collagen and chitosan blends. Biomaterials 25, 795–801 (2004).10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00595-7 ↗
36. Smith, B. L., Schäffer, T. E., Viani, M., Thompson, J. B., Frederick, N. A., Kindt, J., Belcher, A., Stucky, G. D., Morse, D. E. & Hansma, P. K. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature 399, 761–763 (1999).10.1038/21607 ↗
37. Fernandez, J. G., Mills, C. A. & Samitier, J. Complex microstructured 3D surfaces using chitosan biopolymer. Small 5, 614–620 (2009).10.1002/smll.200800907 ↗
38. Muzzarelli, R. A. Biomedical exploitation of chitin and chitosan via mechano-chemical disassembly, electrospinning, dissolution in imidazolium ionic liquids, and supercritical drying. Mar. Drugs 9, 1510–1533 (2011).10.3390/md9091510 ↗
39. Mawad, D., Warren, C., Barton, M., Mahns, D., Morley, J., Pham, B. T., Pham, N. T., Kueh, S. & Lauto, A. Lysozyme depolymerization of photo-activated chitosan adhesive films. Carbohydr Polym. 121, 56–63 (2015).10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.008 ↗