journal article·2025-08-15Open access

Material and design strategies for chronically-implantable neural probes

Fei Liu, Tian-Ming Fu

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 17· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Implantable neural probes capable of monitoring deep brain activities with single-neuron resolution have contributed substantially to our understanding of brain function, treatment of neurological diseases, and application in brain-machine interface. However, conventional probes comprised primarily of rigid inorganic materials with large feature sizes face several limitations when being chronically implanted, including chronic recording instability, elevated immune responses within the brain, and deleterious neuron death. Driven by the strong desire for long-term stable brain interfaces and innovations in biomaterials and probe designs, novel neural probes are emerging and being rapidly adopted in academic and clinical settings. Here, we first review the historical progression of conventional implantable neural probes. We then discuss their limitations in long-term brain interfaces and the underlying biological mechanisms. Next, we summarize recent progress in next-generation chronically stable probe technologies enabled by materials innovations and structural engineering. Last, we highlight several outstanding challenges and future opportunities of the field. We argue that advancements in biomaterial engineering integrated with innovations in probe design and manufacturing will not only play an increasingly critical role in neuroscience and therapeutics but also offer a general approach to achieve long-term stable tissue monitoring by blurring the distinction between man-made devices and natural-born organisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Neurological disorders and treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S. A. & Hudspeth, A. J. Principles of Neural Science 5th edn (McGraw-Hill, 2013).
2. Cunningham, J. P. & Yu, B. M. Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1500–1509 (2014).10.1038/nn.3776 ↗
3. Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A. & Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).10.1038/nrn3241 ↗
4. Stevenson, I. H. & Kording, K. P. How advances in neural recording affect data analysis. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 139–142 (2011).10.1038/nn.2731 ↗
5. Lee, A. T., Chang, E. F., Paredes, M. F. & Nowakowski, T. J. Large-scale neurophysiology and single-cell profiling in human neuroscience. Nature 630, 587–595 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07405-0 ↗
6. Gilja, V. et al. Challenges and opportunities for next-generation intracortically based neural prostheses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 1891–1899 (2011).10.1109/TBME.2011.2107553 ↗
7. Nicolelis, M. A. & Lebedev, M. A. Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain–machine interfaces. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 530–540 (2009).10.1038/nrn2653 ↗
8. Nunez, P. L. & Srinivasan, R. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 ↗
9. Niedermeyer, E. & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (eds) Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields 5th edn (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005).
10. Khodagholy, D. et al. NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 310–315 (2015).10.1038/nn.3905 ↗
11. Lee, J. M. et al. The ultra-thin, minimally invasive surface electrode array NeuroWeb for probing neural activity. Nat. Commun. 14, 7088 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-42860-9 ↗
12. Steinmetz, N. A. et al. Neuropixels 2.0: a miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings. Science 372, eabf4588 (2021).10.1126/science.abf4588 ↗
13. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J. Physiol. 148, 574–591 (1959).10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308 ↗
14. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160, 106 (1962).10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 ↗
15. O’Keefe, J. & Dostrovsky, J. The hippocampus as a spatial map: preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res. 34, 171–175 (1971).10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1 ↗
16. Hong, G. & Lieber, C. M. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).10.1038/s41583-019-0140-6 ↗
17. Won, S. M., Song, E., Reeder, J. T. & Rogers, J. A. Emerging modalities and implantable technologies for neuromodulation. Cell 181, 115–135 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.054 ↗
18. Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K. & Malliaras, G. G. Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601649 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601649 ↗
19. Lacour, S. P., Courtine, G. & Guck, J. Materials and technologies for soft implantable neuroprostheses. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 1–14 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.63 ↗
20. Chen, R., Canales, A. & Anikeeva, P. Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–16 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.93 ↗
21. Chortos, A., Liu, J. & Bao, Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nat. Mater. 15, 937–950 (2016).10.1038/nmat4671 ↗
22. Luan, L. et al. Recent advances in electrical neural interface engineering: minimal invasiveness, longevity, and scalability. Neuron 108, 302–321 (2020).10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.011 ↗
23. Luan, L., Yin, R., Zhu, H. & Xie, C. Emerging penetrating neural electrodes: in pursuit of large scale and longevity. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 25, 185–205 (2023).10.1146/annurev-bioeng-090622-050507 ↗
24. Buzsáki, G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 446–451 (2004).10.1038/nn1233 ↗
25. Hubel, D. H. Tungsten microelectrode for recording from single units. Science 125, 549–550 (1957).10.1126/science.125.3247.549 ↗
26. Dowben, R. M. & Rose, J. E. A metal-filled microelectrode. Science 118, 22–24 (1953).10.1126/science.118.3053.22 ↗
27. McNaughton, B. L., O’Keefe, J. & Barnes, C. A. The stereotrode: a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records. J. Neurosci. Methods 8, 391–397 (1983).10.1016/0165-0270(83)90097-3 ↗
28. Gray, C. M., Maldonado, P. E., Wilson, M. & McNaughton, B. Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 63, 43–54 (1995).10.1016/0165-0270(95)00085-2 ↗
29. Campbell, P. K., Jones, K. E., Huber, R. J., Horch, K. W. & Normann, R. A. A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38, 758–768 (1991).10.1109/10.83588 ↗
30. Jun, J. J. et al. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature 551, 232–236 (2017).10.1038/nature24636 ↗
31. Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A. & Reichert, W. M. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 1–18 (2005).10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 ↗
32. McConnell, G. C. et al. Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration. J. Neural Eng. 6, 056003 (2009).10.1088/1741-2560/6/5/056003 ↗
33. Kozai, T. D., Jaquins-Gerstl, A. S., Vazquez, A. L., Michael, A. C. & Cui, X. T. Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 6, 48–67 (2015).10.1021/cn500256e ↗
34. Sofroniew, M. V. & Vinters, H. V. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 7–35 (2010).10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8 ↗
35. Salatino, J. W., Ludwig, K. A., Kozai, T. D. & Purcell, E. K. Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 862–877 (2017).10.1038/s41551-017-0154-1 ↗
36. Saxena, T. et al. The impact of chronic blood–brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. Biomaterials 34, 4703–4713 (2013).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.007 ↗
37. Jackson, A. & Fetz, E. E. Compact movable microwire array for long-term chronic unit recording in cerebral cortex of primates. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 3109–3118 (2007).10.1152/jn.00569.2007 ↗
38. Chestek, C. A. et al. Long-term stability of neural prosthetic control signals from silicon cortical arrays in rhesus macaque motor cortex. J. Neural Eng. 8, 045005 (2011).10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/045005 ↗
39. Lee, H., Bellamkonda, R. V., Sun, W. & Levenston, M. E. Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain. J. Neural Eng. 2, 81 (2005).10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/003 ↗
40. Karumbaiah, L. et al. The upregulation of specific interleukin (IL) receptor antagonists and paradoxical enhancement of neuronal apoptosis due to electrode induced strain and brain micromotion. Biomaterials 33, 5983–5996 (2012).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.021 ↗
41. Moshayedi, P. et al. The relationship between glial cell mechanosensitivity and foreign body reactions in the central nervous system. Biomaterials 35, 3919–3925 (2014).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.038 ↗
42. Zhong, Y. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Dexamethasone-coated neural probes elicit attenuated inflammatory response and neuronal loss compared to uncoated neural probes. Brain Res. 1148, 15–27 (2007).10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.024 ↗
43. Böhler, C. et al. Actively controlled release of Dexamethasone from neural microelectrodes in a chronic in vivo study. Biomaterials 129, 176–187 (2017).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.019 ↗
44. Luo, X., Matranga, C., Tan, S., Alba, N. & Cui, X. T. Carbon nanotube nanoreservior for controlled release of anti-inflammatory dexamethasone. Biomaterials 32, 6316–6323 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.020 ↗
45. Kim, D.-H. & Martin, D. C. Sustained release of dexamethasone from hydrophilic matrices using PLGA nanoparticles for neural drug delivery. Biomaterials 27, 3031–3037 (2006).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.021 ↗
46. Zhang, Z., Nong, J. & Zhong, Y. Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective layer-by-layer coatings for neural implants. J. Neural Eng. 12, 046015 (2015).10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046015 ↗
47. Zhong, Y. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Controlled release of anti-inflammatory agent α-MSH from neural implants. J. Control Release 106, 309–318 (2005).10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.05.012 ↗
48. He, W., McConnell, G. C., Schneider, T. M. & Bellamkonda, R. V. A novel anti-inflammatory surface for neural electrodes. Adv. Mater. 19, 3529–3533 (2007).10.1002/adma.200700943 ↗
49. Liu, S. et al. A nanozyme-based electrode for high-performance neural recording. Adv. Mater. 36, 2304297 (2024).10.1002/adma.202304297 ↗
50. Jeong, J. et al. Biomimetic design of biocompatible neural probes for deep brain signal monitoring and stimulation: super static interface for immune response-enhanced contact. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2417727 (2025).10.1002/adfm.202417727 ↗
51. He, W., McConnell, G. C. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Nanoscale laminin coating modulates cortical scarring response around implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. J. Neural Eng. 3, 316 (2006).10.1088/1741-2560/3/4/009 ↗
52. Oakes, R. S., Polei, M. D., Skousen, J. L. & Tresco, P. A. An astrocyte derived extracellular matrix coating reduces astrogliosis surrounding chronically implanted microelectrode arrays in rat cortex. Biomaterials 154, 1–11 (2018).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.001 ↗
53. Golabchi, A., Woeppel, K. M., Li, X., Lagenaur, C. F. & Cui, X. T. Neuroadhesive protein coating improves the chronic performance of neuroelectronics in mouse brain. Biosens. Bioelectron. 155, 112096 (2020).10.1016/j.bios.2020.112096 ↗
54. Kolarcik, C. L. et al. Elastomeric and soft conducting microwires for implantable neural interfaces. Soft Matter 11, 4847–4861 (2015).10.1039/C5SM00174A ↗
55. Scholten, K. & Meng, E. Materials for microfabricated implantable devices: a review. Lab Chip 15, 4256–4272 (2015).10.1039/C5LC00809C ↗
56. Rousche, P. J. et al. Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48, 361–371 (2001).10.1109/10.914800 ↗
57. Zhang, S. et al. A removable insertion shuttle for ultraflexible neural probe implantation with stable chronic brain electrophysiological recording. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 1901775 (2020).10.1002/admi.201901775 ↗
58. Lv, S. et al. Tentacle microelectrode arrays uncover soft boundary neurons in hippocampal CA1. Adv. Sci. 11, 2401670 (2024).10.1002/advs.202401670 ↗
59. Malekoshoaraie, M. H. et al. Fully flexible implantable neural probes for electrophysiology recording and controlled neurochemical modulation. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 10, 91 (2024).10.1038/s41378-024-00685-6 ↗
60. Cointe, C. et al. Scalable batch fabrication of ultrathin flexible neural probes using a bioresorbable silk layer. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 8, 21 (2022).10.1038/s41378-022-00353-7 ↗
61. Liu, J. et al. Syringe-injectable electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 629–636 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2015.115 ↗
62. He, F., Lycke, R., Ganji, M., Xie, C. & Luan, L. Ultraflexible neural electrodes for long-lasting intracortical recording.iScience 23, 101387 (2020).10.1016/j.isci.2020.101387 ↗
63. Wang, X. et al. Ultraflexible neural electrodes enabled synchronized long-term dopamine detection and wideband chronic recording deep in brain. ACS Nano 18, 34272–34287 (2024).10.1021/acsnano.4c12429 ↗
64. Hassler, C., Boretius, T. & Stieglitz, T. Polymers for neural implants. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 49, 18–33 (2011).10.1002/polb.22169 ↗
65. Bettinger, C. J. et al. Recent advances in neural interfaces—materials chemistry to clinical translation. MRS Bull. 45, 655–668 (2020).10.1557/mrs.2020.195 ↗
66. Kim, B. J. & Meng, E. Micromachining of parylene C for bioMEMS. Polym. Adv. Technol. 27, 564–576 (2016).10.1002/pat.3729 ↗
67. Gablech, I. & Głowacki, E. D. State-of-the-art electronic materials for thin films in bioelectronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 9, 2300258 (2023).10.1002/aelm.202300258 ↗
68. Mercanzini, A. et al. Demonstration of cortical recording using novel flexible polymer neural probes. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 143, 90–96 (2008).10.1016/j.sna.2007.07.027 ↗
69. Weltman, A., Yoo, J. & Meng, E. Flexible, penetrating brain probes enabled by advances in polymer microfabrication. Micromachines 7, 180 (2016).10.3390/mi7100180 ↗
70. Park, S. I. et al. Soft, stretchable, fully implantable miniaturized optoelectronic systems for wireless optogenetics. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1280–1286 (2015).10.1038/nbt.3415 ↗
71. Tybrandt, K. et al. High-density stretchable electrode grids for chronic neural recording. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706520 (2018).10.1002/adma.201706520 ↗
72. Minev, I. R. et al. Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces. Science 347, 159–163 (2015).10.1126/science.1260318 ↗
73. Zhang, Y. et al. Battery-free, fully implantable optofluidic cuff system for wireless optogenetic and pharmacological neuromodulation of peripheral nerves. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5296 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aaw5296 ↗
74. Jeong, J.-W. et al. Wireless optofluidic systems for programmable in vivo pharmacology and optogenetics. Cell 162, 662–674 (2015).10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.058 ↗
75. Wen, X. et al. Flexible, multifunctional neural probe with liquid metal enabled, ultra-large tunable stiffness for deep-brain chemical sensing and agent delivery. Biosens. Bioelectron. 131, 37–45 (2019).10.1016/j.bios.2019.01.060 ↗
76. Rezaei, S., Xu, Y. & Pang, S. Control of neural probe shank flexibility by fluidic pressure in embedded microchannel using PDMS/PI hybrid substrate. PLoS ONE 14, e0220258 (2019).10.1371/journal.pone.0220258 ↗
77. Momin, M. 3D-printed flexible neural probes for recordings at single-neuron level. Device 2, 100519 (2024).10.1016/j.device.2024.100519 ↗
78. Zhang, E. N. et al. Mechanically matched silicone brain implants reduce brain foreign body response. Adv. Mater. Technol. 6, 2000909 (2021).10.1002/admt.202000909 ↗
79. Le Floch, P. et al. 3D spatiotemporally scalable in vivo neural probes based on fluorinated elastomers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 319–329 (2024).10.1038/s41565-023-01545-6 ↗
80. Liu, Y. et al. Soft and elastic hydrogel-based microelectronics for localized low-voltage neuromodulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 58–68 (2019).10.1038/s41551-018-0335-6 ↗
81. Liang, Q. et al. Highly stretchable hydrogels as wearable and implantable sensors for recording physiological and brain neural signals. Adv. Sci. 9, 2201059 (2022).10.1002/advs.202201059 ↗
82. Spencer, K. C. et al. Characterization of mechanically matched hydrogel coatings to improve the biocompatibility of neural implants. Sci. Rep. 7, 1952 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-02107-2 ↗
83. Park, S. et al. Adaptive and multifunctional hydrogel hybrid probes for long-term sensing and modulation of neural activity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3435 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-23802-9 ↗
84. Ren, X. et al. Uniaxial extending neural probes for bleeding-absent implantation. npj Flex. Electron 8, 36 (2024).10.1038/s41528-024-00323-1 ↗
85. Jiang, Y. et al. Topological supramolecular network enabled high-conductivity, stretchable organic bioelectronics. Science 375, 1411–1417 (2022).10.1126/science.abj7564 ↗
86. Castagnola, V. et al. Parylene-based flexible neural probes with PEDOT coated surface for brain stimulation and recording. Biosens. Bioelectron. 67, 450–457 (2015).10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.004 ↗
87. Ludwig, K. A., Uram, J. D., Yang, J., Martin, D. C. & Kipke, D. R. Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)(PEDOT) film. J. Neural Eng. 3, 59 (2006).10.1088/1741-2560/3/1/007 ↗
88. Yuk, H. et al. 3D printing of conducting polymers. Nat. Commun. 11, 1604 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15316-7 ↗
89. Strakosas, X. et al. Metabolite-induced in vivo fabrication of substrate-free organic bioelectronics. Science 379, 795–802 (2023).10.1126/science.adc9998 ↗
90. Canales, A. et al. Multifunctional fibers for simultaneous optical, electrical and chemical interrogation of neural circuits in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 277–284 (2015).10.1038/nbt.3093 ↗
91. Park, S. et al. One-step optogenetics with multifunctional flexible polymer fibers. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 612–619 (2017).10.1038/nn.4510 ↗
92. Guo, Y. et al. Polymer composite with carbon nanofibers aligned during thermal drawing as a microelectrode for chronic neural interfaces. ACS Nano 11, 6574–6585 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.6b07550 ↗
93. Qi, J. et al. Liquid metal–polymer conductor-based conformal cyborg devices. Chem. Rev. 124, 2081–2137 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00317 ↗
94. Park, Y.-G. et al. In-vivo integration of soft neural probes through high-resolution printing of liquid electronics on the cranium. Nat. Commun. 15, 1772 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-45768-0 ↗
95. Apollo, N. V. et al. Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes. J. Neural Eng. 17, 041002 (2020).10.1088/1741-2552/abacd7 ↗
96. Kozai, T. D. Y. et al. Ultrasmall implantable composite microelectrodes with bioactive surfaces for chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 1065–1073 (2012).10.1038/nmat3468 ↗
97. Luan, L. et al. Ultraflexible nanoelectronic probes form reliable, glial scar–free neural integration. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601966 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601966 ↗
98. Kim, T.-I. et al. Injectable, cellular-scale optoelectronics with applications for wireless optogenetics. Science 340, 211–216 (2013).10.1126/science.1232437 ↗
99. Musk, E. An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e16194 (2019).10.2196/16194 ↗
100. Hanson, T. L., Diaz-Botia, C. A., Kharazia, V., Maharbiz, M. M. & Sabes, P. N. The “sewing machine” for minimally invasive neural recording. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/578542 (2019).10.1101/578542 ↗