Architecture of high-strength aluminum–matrix composites processed by a novel microcasting technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As important lightweight structural materials, cast aluminum alloys have been largely used in the transportation and aerospace industries. In general, Al–Si-based alloys comprise more than 90% of all castings due to their excellent castability and corrosion resistance. However, even though various reinforcements have been introduced, the strength of these alloys is not that high, which severely limits their use for certain high-performance applications. Here, we report on a new strategy and technology to reinforce Al–Si alloys to increase their yield strength into the ~400–660 MPa range, a level that is 29–113% higher than that of all current cast Al–Si alloys, laboratory or commercial, and comparable to that of many high-strength steels but with ~40% lower density. By introducing continuous Ti–6Al–4V reinforcements into the Al–Si matrix through a novel microcasting process, the yield strength of the resulting alloy can be enhanced to between 4 and 6 times higher than that of the pure Al–Si alloy. The extraordinary reinforcing effect originates from the occurrence of multiscale strengthening mechanisms, including macroscale compound strengthening (the rule of mixtures amended by crack arrest mechanism), mesoscale strain-gradient strengthening, and microscale interface-affected-zone and nanoparticle strengthening. The core principle of our material design is to make all components of the composite fully participate in plastic (compatible) deformation, and thus, continuous reinforcements, instead of discrete reinforced structures (e.g., particles, whiskers, and short fibers), were introduced into the Al–Si alloy. Combined with 3-D printing technology, the present microcasting process can realize strengthening at the designed position by architecting specific reinforcements in the matrix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Surappa, M. K. Aluminium matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. Sadhana 28, 319–334 (2003).10.1007/BF02717141 ↗
2. Kouzeli, M. & Mortensen, A. Size dependent strengthening in particle reinforced aluminium. Acta Mater. 50, 39–51 (2002).10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00327-5 ↗
3. Wang, A. & Rack, H. J. Transition wear behavior of SiC-particulate- and SiC-whisker-reinforced 7091 Al metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 147, 211–224 (1991).10.1016/0921-5093(91)90848-H ↗
4. He, C. et al. An approach to obtaining homogeneously dispersed carbon nanotubes in Al powders for preparing reinforced Al–matrix composites. Adv. Mater. 19, 1128–1132 (2007).10.1002/adma.200601381 ↗
5. Wang, J. et al. Reinforcement with graphene nanosheets in aluminum matrix composites. Scr. Mater. 66, 594–597 (2012).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.012 ↗
6. Rohatgi, P. Cast aluminum-matrix composites for automotive applications. JOM 43, 10–15 (1991).10.1007/BF03220538 ↗
7. Rawal, S. P. Metal–matrix composites for space applications. JOM 53, 14–17 (2001).10.1007/s11837-001-0139-z ↗
8. Pai, B. C., Ramani, G., Pillai, R. M. & Satyanarayana, K. G. Role of magnesium in cast aluminium alloy matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. 30, 1903–1911 (1995).10.1007/BF00353012 ↗
9. Suresh, S. Graded materials for resistance to contact deformation and damage. Science 292, 2447–2451 (2001).10.1126/science.1059716 ↗
10. Wei, Y. J. et al. Evading the strength-ductility trade-off dilemma in steel through gradient hierarchical nanotwins. Nat. Commun. 5, 3580 (2014).
11. Shao, C. W. et al. Improvement of low-cycle fatigue resistance in TWIP steel by regulating the grain size and distribution. Acta Mater. 134, 128–142 (2017).10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.004 ↗
12. Huang, M. et al. Role of layered structure in ductility improvement of layered Ti–Al metal composite. Acta Mater. 153, 235–249 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.005 ↗
13. Huang, C. X. et al. Interface affected zone for optimal strength and ductility in heterogeneous laminate. Mater. Today 21, 713–719 (2018).10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.006 ↗
14. Ojima, M. et al. Stress partitioning behavior of multilayered steels during tensile deformation measured by in situ neutron diffraction. Scr. Mater. 66, 139–142 (2012).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.018 ↗
15. Lhuissier, P., Inoue, J. & Koseki, T. Strain field in a brittle/ductile multilayered steel composite. Scr. Mater. 64, 970–973 (2011).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.048 ↗
16. Shao, C. W. et al. Simultaneous improvement of strength and plasticity: Additional work-hardening from gradient microstructure. Acta Mater. 145, 413–428 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.028 ↗
17. Yang, M. X., Pan, Y., Yuan, F. P., Zhu, Y. T. & Wu, X. L. Back stress strengthening and strain hardening in gradient structure. Mater. Res. Lett. 4, 145–151 (2016).10.1080/21663831.2016.1153004 ↗
18. Zhao, S. et al. Compressive and fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti–6Al–4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 150, 1–15 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.060 ↗
19. Harach, D. J. & Vecchio, K. S. Microstructure evolution in metal-intermetallic laminate (MIL) composites synthesized by reactive foil sintering in air. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32, 1493–1505 (2001).10.1007/s11661-001-0237-0 ↗
20. Sujata, M., Bhargava, S. & Sangal, S. Microstructural features of TiAl3 base compounds formed by reaction synthesis. Isij Int. 36, 255–262 (1996).10.2355/isijinternational.36.255 ↗
21. Liu, K. W., Zhang, J. S., Wang, J. G. & Chen, G. L. Formation of intermetallic nanocomposites in the Ti–Al–Si system by mechanical alloying and subsequent heat treatment. J. Mater. Res. 13, 1198–1203 (2011).
22. Manna, I., Nandi, P., Bandyopadhyay, B., Ghoshray, K. & Ghoshray, A. Microstructural and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of solid-state amorphization in Al–Ti–Si composites prepared by mechanical alloying. Acta Mater. 52, 4133–4142 (2004).10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.026 ↗
23. Watanabe, Y., Sequeira, P. D., Sato, H., Inamura, T. & Hosoda, H. Aluminum matrix texture in Al–Al3Ti functionally graded materials analyzed by electron back-scattering diffraction. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 01AG03 (2015).10.7567/JJAP.55.01AG03 ↗
24. Zolotorevsky, V. S., Belov, N. A. & Glazoff, M. V. Casting Aluminum Alloys. Vol. 12 (Elsevier Amsterdam, 2007).10.1016/B978-008045370-5.50008-0 ↗
25. Zhang, Z. F., He, G., Eckert, J. & Schultz, L. Fracture mechanisms in bulk metallic glassy materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 045505 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.045505 ↗
26. Qu, R. T., Liu, Z. Q., Wang, G. & Zhang, Z. F. Progressive shear band propagation in metallic glasses under compression. Acta Mater. 91, 19–33 (2015).10.1016/j.actamat.2015.03.026 ↗
27. Yamaguchi, M., Umakoshi, Y. & Yamane, T. Plastic deformation of the intermetallic compound Al3Ti. Philos. Mag. A 55, 301–315 (1987).10.1080/01418618708209869 ↗
28. Sajjadi, S. A., Ezatpour, H. R. & Torabi Parizi, M. Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir and compo-casting processes. Mater. Des. 34, 106–111 (2012).10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.037 ↗
29. Hashim, J., Looney, L. & Hashmi, M. S. J. The enhancement of wettability of SiC particles in cast aluminium matrix composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 119, 329–335 (2001).10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00919-0 ↗
30. Tekmen, C., Ozdemir, I., Cocen, U. & Onel, K. The mechanical response of Al–Si–Mg/SiCp composite: influence of porosity. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 360, 365–371 (2003).10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00461-1 ↗
31. Wu, X. L. et al. Synergetic strengthening by gradient structure. Mater. Res. Lett. 2, 185–191 (2014).10.1080/21663831.2014.935821 ↗
32. Wu, X. L. et al. Heterogeneous lamella structure unites ultrafine-grain strength with coarse-grain ductility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14501–14505 (2015).10.1073/pnas.1517193112 ↗
33. Chen, K. & Li, L. Ordered structures with functional units as a paradigm of material design. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901115 (2019).10.1002/adma.201901115 ↗
34. Kolednik, O., Predan, J., Fischer, F. D. & Fratzl, P. Bioinspired design criteria for damage-resistant materials with periodically varying microstructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3634–3641 (2011).10.1002/adfm.201100443 ↗
35. Miserez, A. et al. Effects of laminate architecture on fracture resistance of sponge biosilica: Lessons from nature. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1241–1248 (2008).10.1002/adfm.200701135 ↗
36. Bourgeois N. Behavior and damage of an Al/SiCp metal matrix composite: characterization and micromechanical modelling. PhD thesis (Ecole Centrale de Paris, 1994).
37. Milman, Y. V. et al. Mechanical behaviour of Al3Ti intermetallic and L12 phases on its basis. Intermetallics 9, 839–845 (2001).10.1016/S0966-9795(01)00073-5 ↗
38. Murr, L. E. Dislocation ledge sources: dispelling the myth of Frank–Read source importance. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 47, 5811–5826 (2016).10.1007/s11661-015-3286-5 ↗
39. Li, J. C. M. High‐angle tilt boundary—a dislocation core model. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 525–541 (1961).10.1063/1.1736036 ↗
40. Zhang, W. Y., Du, Y. H. & Zhang, P. Vortex-free stir casting of Al–1.5wt% Si–SiC composite. J. Alloy. Compd. 787, 206–215 (2019).10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.099 ↗
41. Cöcen, Ü. & Önel, K. Ductility and strength of extruded SiCp/aluminium-alloy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 62, 275–282 (2002).10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00198-1 ↗
42. Boopathi, M. M., Arulshri, K. & Iyandurai, N. Evaluation of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy 2024 reinforced with silicon carbide and fly ash hybrid metal matrix composites. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 10, 219 (2013).10.3844/ajassp.2013.219.229 ↗
43. Ashok Kumar, B. & Murugan, N. Metallurgical and mechanical characterization of stir cast AA6061-T6-AlNp composite. Mater. Des. 40, 52–58 (2012).10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.038 ↗
44. Raviraj, M. S., Sharanprabhu, C. M. & Mohankumar, G. C. Experimental analysis on processing and properties of Al–TiC metal matrix composites. Procedia Mater. Sci. 5, 2032–2038 (2014).10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.536 ↗
45. Mohapatra, S., Chaubey, A. K., Mishra, D. K. & Singh, S. K. Fabrication of Al-TiC composites by hot consolidation technique: its microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 5, 117–122 (2016).10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.07.001 ↗
46. Noguchi, T. et al. Carbon nanotube/aluminium composites with uniform dispersion. Mater. Trans. 45, 602–604 (2004).10.2320/matertrans.45.602 ↗
47. Kala, H., Mer, K. K. S. & Kumar, S. A review on mechanical and tribological behaviors of stir cast aluminum matrix composites. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6, 1951–1960 (2014).10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.229 ↗
48. Zhao, D. G., Liu, X. F., Pan, Y. C., Liu, Y. X. & Bian, X. F. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of AlSiCuMgNi piston alloys reinforced with TiB2 particles. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 4227–4232 (2006).10.1007/s10853-006-6247-y ↗
49. Lü, L., Lai, M. O., Su, Y., Teo, H. L. & Feng, C. F. In situ TiB2 reinforced Al alloy composites. Scr. Mater. 45, 1017–1023 (2001).10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01128-9 ↗
50. Chen, Z., Kang, H., Zhao, Y., Zheng, Y. & Wang, T. The role of TiB2 in strengthening TiB2 reinforced aluminium casting composites. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 117, 012039 (2016).10.1088/1757-899X/117/1/012039 ↗