Biomaterial-based regenerative therapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As one of the most intractable neurological diseases, spinal cord injury (SCI) often leads to permanent neurological impairment in patients. Unfortunately, due to the complex pathological mechanisms and unique postinjury microenvironment, there is currently no way to completely repair the injured spinal cord. In recent years, with the rapid development of tissue engineering technology, the combination of biomaterials and medicine has provided a new idea for treating SCI. Here, we systematically summarize representative biomaterials, including natural, synthetic, nano, and hybrid materials, and their applications in SCI treatment. In addition, we describe several state-of-the-art fabrication techniques for tissue engineering. Importantly, we provide novel insights for the use of biomaterial-based therapeutic strategies to reduce secondary damage and promote repair. Finally, we discuss several biomaterial clinical studies. This review aims to provide a reference and new insights for the future exploration of spinal cord regeneration strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nerve injury and regeneration · Spinal Cord Injury Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. McDonald, J. W. & Sadowsky, C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet 359, 417–425 (2002).10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07603-1 ↗
2. Courtine, G. & Sofroniew, M. V. Spinal cord repair: advances in biology and technology. Nat. Med. 25, 898–908 (2019).10.1038/s41591-019-0475-6 ↗
3. Fehlings, M. G. et al. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Introduction, Rationale, and Scope. Glob. Spine J. 7, 84s–94s (2017).10.1177/2192568217703387 ↗
4. Li, J. P., He, L. M. & Wu, W. T. Pathological changes and repair strategies for spinal cord injury (in Chinese). Sci Sin Vitae. 51 (2021).10.1360/SSV-2021-0065 ↗
5. Ulndreaj, A., Chio, J. C., Ahuja, C. S. & Fehlings, M. G. Modulating the immune response in spinal cord injury. Expert Rev. Neurother. 16, 1127–1129 (2016).10.1080/14737175.2016.1207532 ↗
6. Ahuja, C. S. et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury-repair and regeneration. Neurosurgery 80, S9–s22 (2017).10.1093/neuros/nyw080 ↗
7. Anwar, M. A., Al Shehabi, T. S. & Eid, A. H. Inflammogenesis of secondary spinal cord injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 98 (2016).10.3389/fncel.2016.00098 ↗
8. Hollister, S. J. Scaffold design and manufacturing: from concept to clinic. Adv. Mater. 21, 3330–3342 (2009).10.1002/adma.200802977 ↗
9. Cho, A. N. et al. Aligned brain extracellular matrix promotes differentiation and myelination of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived oligodendrocytes. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 11, 15344–15353 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b03242 ↗
10. Singh, D., Singh, D., Zo, S. & Han, S. S. Nano-biomimetics for nano/micro tissue regeneration. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 10, 3141–3161 (2014).10.1166/jbn.2014.1941 ↗
11. Gezercan, Y. et al. The outcomes of late term surgical treatment of penetrating peripheral nerve injuries. Turk. Neurosurg. 26, 146–152 (2016).
12. Whitworth, I. H., Doré, C. J., Green, C. J. & Terenghi, G. Increased axonal regeneration over long nerve gaps using autologous nerve-muscle sandwich grafts. Microsurgery 16, 772–778 (1995).10.1002/micr.1920161203 ↗
13. Cunha, C., Panseri, S. & Antonini, S. Emerging nanotechnology approaches in tissue engineering for peripheral nerve regeneration. Nanomed. : Nanotechnol., Biol., Med. 7, 50–59 (2011).10.1016/j.nano.2010.07.004 ↗
14. Fawcett, J. W. & Asher, R. A. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res. Bull. 49, 377–391 (1999).10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00072-6 ↗
15. Milich, L. M., Ryan, C. B. & Lee, J. K. The origin, fate, and contribution of macrophages to spinal cord injury pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 137, 785–797 (2019).10.1007/s00401-019-01992-3 ↗
16. Simon, D. W. et al. The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13, 171–191 (2017).10.1038/nrneurol.2017.13 ↗
17. Ahuja, C. S., Martin, A. R. & Fehlings, M. Recent advances in managing a spinal cord injury secondary to trauma. F1000Res 5, 1017 (2016).10.12688/f1000research.7586.1 ↗
18. Yang, L. et al. Effective modulation of CNS inhibitory microenvironment using bioinspired hybrid-nanoscaffold-based therapeutic interventions. Adv. Mater. 32, e2002578 (2020).10.1002/adma.202002578 ↗
19. Han, Q. et al. Restoring cellular energetics promotes axonal regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Cell Metab. 31, 623–641.e628 (2020).10.1016/j.cmet.2020.02.002 ↗
20. Anderson, M. A. et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200 (2016).10.1038/nature17623 ↗
21. Shi, Q. et al. Collagen scaffolds modified with collagen-binding bFGF promotes the neural regeneration in a rat hemisected spinal cord injury model. Sci. China Life Sci. 57, 232–240 (2014).10.1007/s11427-014-4612-7 ↗
22. Moncal, K. K., Ozbolat, V., Datta, P., Heo, D. N. & Ozbolat, I. T. Thermally-controlled extrusion-based bioprinting of collagen. Journal of materials science. Mater. Med. 30, 55 (2019).10.1007/s10856-019-6258-2 ↗
23. Sun, Y. et al. 3D printing collagen/chitosan scaffold ameliorated axon regeneration and neurological recovery after spinal cord injury. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 107, 1898–1908 (2019).10.1002/jbm.a.36675 ↗
24. Zou, Y. et al. Aligned collagen scaffold combination with human spinal cord-derived neural stem cells to improve spinal cord injury repair. Biomater. Sci. 8, 5145–5156 (2020).10.1039/D0BM00431F ↗
25. Yang, Y. et al. Small molecules combined with collagen hydrogel direct neurogenesis and migration of neural stem cells after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 269, 120479 (2021).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120479 ↗
26. Schaub, N. J., Johnson, C. D., Cooper, B. & Gilbert, R. J. Electrospun fibers for spinal cord injury research and regeneration. J. Neurotrauma 33, 1405–1415 (2016).10.1089/neu.2015.4165 ↗
27. Li, X. et al. Electrospun collagen fibers with spatial patterning of SDF1α for the guidance of neural stem cells. Adv. Healtc. Mater. 4, 1869–1876 (2015).10.1002/adhm.201500271 ↗
28. Han, S. et al. Human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells loaded on linear ordered collagen scaffold improves functional recovery after completely transected spinal cord injury in canine. Sci China Life Sci. 61, 2–13 (2018).10.1007/s11427-016-9002-6 ↗
29. Zou, Y. et al. Comparison of regenerative effects of transplanting three-dimensional longitudinal scaffold loaded-human mesenchymal stem cells and human neural stem cells on spinal cord completely transected rats. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6, 1671–1680 (2020).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01790 ↗
30. Ma, F. et al. Use of natural neural scaffolds consisting of engineered vascular endothelial growth factor immobilized on ordered collagen fibers filled in a collagen tube for peripheral nerve regeneration in rats. Int J. Mol. Sci. 15, 18593–18609 (2014).10.3390/ijms151018593 ↗
31. Shen, H. et al. Advances in biomaterial-based spinal cord injury repair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2110628 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202110628 ↗
32. Lu, Q., Feng, Q., Hu, K. & Cui, F. Preparation of three-dimensional fibroin/collagen scaffolds in various pH conditions. Journal of materials science. Mater. Med. 19, 629–634 (2008).10.1007/s10856-007-3180-9 ↗
33. Ghorbani, F., Zamanian, A., Kermanian, F. & Shamoosi, A. A bioinspired 3D shape olibanum-collagen-gelatin scaffolds with tunable porous microstructure for efficient neural tissue regeneration. Biotechnol. Prog. 36, e2918 (2020).10.1002/btpr.2918 ↗
34. Nazari, B. et al. Fibrin hydrogel as a scaffold for differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into oligodendrocytes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res B Appl Biomater. 108, 192–200 (2020).10.1002/jbm.b.34378 ↗
35. Yao, S. et al. Hierarchically aligned fibrin nanofiber hydrogel accelerated axonal regrowth and locomotor function recovery in rat spinal cord injury. Int J. Nanomed. 13, 2883–2895 (2018).10.2147/IJN.S159356 ↗
36. Yang, L. et al. Improved mechanical properties by modifying fibrin scaffold with PCL and its biocompatibility evaluation. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 31, 658–678 (2020).10.1080/09205063.2019.1710370 ↗
37. Kushchayev, S. V. et al. Hyaluronic acid scaffold has a neuroprotective effect in hemisection spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. Spine 25, 114–124 (2016).10.3171/2015.9.SPINE15628 ↗
38. Wang, X., He, J., Wang, Y. & Cui, F. Z. Hyaluronic acid-based scaffold for central neural tissue engineering. Interface focus 2, 278–291 (2012).10.1098/rsfs.2012.0016 ↗
39. Zaviskova, K. et al. Injectable hydroxyphenyl derivative of hyaluronic acid hydrogel modified with RGD as scaffold for spinal cord injury repair. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 106, 1129–1140 (2018).10.1002/jbm.a.36311 ↗
40. Zhao, X. et al. Optimized, visible light-induced crosslinkable hybrid gelatin/hyaluronic acid scaffold promotes complete spinal cord injury repair. Biomed. Mater. 17, 024104 (2022).10.1088/1748-605X/ac45ec ↗
41. Patel, H., Bonde, M. & Srinivasan, G. Biodegradable polymer scaffold for tissue engineering. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 25, 20–29 (2011).
42. Ikeda, T. et al. Fabrication and characteristics of chitosan sponge as a tissue engineering scaffold. Biomed. Res Int 2014, 786892 (2014).10.1155/2014/786892 ↗
43. Chedly, J. et al. Physical chitosan microhydrogels as scaffolds for spinal cord injury restoration and axon regeneration. Biomaterials 138, 91–107 (2017).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.024 ↗
44. Hua-bin, Z., Lin, L. & Lu, C. Tissue-engineered spinal cord construction by chitosan alginate scaffold and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 21, 4199 (2017).
45. Grijalvo, S., Nieto-Diaz, M., Maza, R. M., Eritja, R. & Diaz, D. D. Alginate hydrogels as scaffolds and delivery systems to repair the damaged spinal cord. Biotechnol. J. 14, e1900275 (2019).10.1002/biot.201900275 ↗
46. Sitoci-Ficici, K. H. et al. Non-functionalized soft alginate hydrogel promotes locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury in a rat hemimyelonectomy model. Acta Neurochir. (Wien.) 160, 449–457 (2018).10.1007/s00701-017-3389-4 ↗
47. Huang, L. et al. Anisotropic alginate hydrogels promote axonal growth across chronic spinal cord transections after scar removal. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6, 2274–2286 (2020).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01802 ↗
48. Schackel, T. et al. Peptides and Astroglia improve the regenerative capacity of alginate gels in the injured spinal cord. Tissue Eng. Part A 25, 522–537 (2019).10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0082 ↗
49. Liu, S. et al. Regulated viral BDNF delivery in combination with Schwann cells promotes axonal regeneration through capillary alginate hydrogels after spinal cord injury. Acta Biomater. 60, 167–180 (2017).10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.024 ↗
50. Gholami, M., Gilanpour, H., Sadeghinezhad, J. & Asghari, A. Facile fabrication of an erythropoietin-alginate/chitosan hydrogel and evaluation of its local therapeutic effects on spinal cord injury in rats. Daru 29, 255–265 (2021).10.1007/s40199-021-00399-4 ↗
51. Zhang, Y. et al. Lentiviral-mediated expression of polysialic acid in spinal cord and conditioning lesion promote regeneration of sensory axons into spinal cord. Mol. Ther. : J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 15, 1796–1804 (2007).10.1038/sj.mt.6300220 ↗
52. El Maarouf, A., Petridis, A. K. & Rutishauser, U. Use of polysialic acid in repair of the central nervous system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16989–16994 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0608036103 ↗
53. Ghosh, M. et al. Extensive cell migration, axon regeneration, and improved function with polysialic acid-modified Schwann cells after spinal cord injury. GLIA 60, 979–992 (2012).10.1002/glia.22330 ↗
54. Papastefanaki, F. et al. Grafts of Schwann cells engineered to express PSA-NCAM promote functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Brain. 130, 2159–2174 (2007).10.1093/brain/awm155 ↗
55. Marino, P., Norreel, J. C., Schachner, M., Rougon, G. & Amoureux, M. C. A polysialic acid mimetic peptide promotes functional recovery in a mouse model of spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 219, 163–174 (2009).10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.05.009 ↗
56. Mehanna, A. et al. Polysialic acid glycomimetic promotes functional recovery and plasticity after spinal cord injury in mice. Mol. Ther. 18, 34–43 (2010).10.1038/mt.2009.235 ↗
57. Pan, H. C., Shen, Y. Q., Loers, G., Jakovcevski, I. & Schachner, M. Tegaserod, a small compound mimetic of polysialic acid, promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Neuroscience 277, 356–366 (2014).10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.069 ↗
58. Loers, G. et al. Nonyloxytryptamine mimics polysialic acid and modulates neuronal and glial functions in cell culture. J. neurochemistry 128, 88–100 (2014).10.1111/jnc.12408 ↗
59. Zhang, S. et al. Polycaprolactone/polysialic acid hybrid, multifunctional nanofiber scaffolds for treatment of spinal cord injury. Acta Biomater. 77, 15–27 (2018).10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.038 ↗
60. Wang, X. J. et al. Polysialic-acid-based micelles promote neural regeneration in spinal cord injury therapy. Nano Lett. 19, 829–838 (2019).10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04020 ↗
61. Echave, M. C., Saenz del Burgo, L., Pedraz, J. L. & Orive, G. Gelatin as biomaterial for tissue engineering. Curr. Pharm. Des. 23, 3567–3584 (2017).10.2174/0929867324666170511123101 ↗
62. Liu, D. et al. Dual-Cues laden scaffold facilitates neurovascular regeneration and motor functional recovery after complete spinal cord injury. Adv. Health. Mater. 10, e2100089 (2021).10.1002/adhm.202100089 ↗
63. Fan, L. et al. Directing induced pluripotent stem cell derived neural stem cell fate with a three-dimensional biomimetic hydrogel for spinal cord injury repair. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 10, 17742–17755 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b05293 ↗
64. Yao, M. et al. Dual-enzymatically cross-linked gelatin hydrogel enhances neural differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and functional recovery in experimental murine spinal cord injury. J. Mater. Chem. B. 9, 440–452 (2021).10.1039/D0TB02033H ↗
65. Luo, Y. & Shoichet, M. S. A photolabile hydrogel for guided three-dimensional cell growth and migration. Nat. Mater. 3, 249–253 (2004).10.1038/nmat1092 ↗
66. Stokols, S. & Tuszynski, M. H. Freeze-dried agarose scaffolds with uniaxial channels stimulate and guide linear axonal growth following spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 27, 443–451 (2006).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.039 ↗
67. Han, S. et al. Implantation of a Matrigel-loaded agarose scaffold promotes functional regeneration of axons after spinal cord injury in rat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 496, 785–791 (2018).10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.157 ↗
68. Yang, B. et al. A conductive supramolecular hydrogel creates ideal endogenous niches to promote spinal cord injury repair. Bioact. Mater. 15, 103–119 (2022).
69. Gros, T., Sakamoto, J. S., Blesch, A., Havton, L. A. & Tuszynski, M. H. Regeneration of long-tract axons through sites of spinal cord injury using templated agarose scaffolds. Biomaterials 31, 6719–6729 (2010).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.035 ↗
70. An, H., Li, Q. & Wen, J. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated thermal-responsive hydrogel network bridges combined photo-plasmonic nanoparticulate system for the treatment of urinary bladder dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol. 203, 111741 (2020).10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111741 ↗
71. Gao, M. et al. Templated agarose scaffolds for the support of motor axon regeneration into sites of complete spinal cord transection. Biomaterials 34, 1529–1536 (2013).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.070 ↗
72. Cox, A. et al. Nanoparticle-based estrogen delivery to spinal cord injury site reduces local parenchymal destruction and improves functional recovery. J. Neurotrauma 38, 342–352 (2021).10.1089/neu.2020.7047 ↗
73. Gu, Q. et al. Functional 3D neural mini-tissues from printed gel-based bioink and human neural stem cells. Adv. Health. Mater. 5, 1429–1438 (2016).10.1002/adhm.201600095 ↗
74. Liu, S., Xie, Y. Y. & Wang, B. Role and prospects of regenerative biomaterials in the repair of spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res 14, 1352–1363 (2019).10.4103/1673-5374.253512 ↗
75. Brown, M., Li, J., Moraes, C., Tabrizian, M. & Li-Jessen, N. Y. K. Decellularized extracellular matrix: New promising and challenging biomaterials for regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 289, 121786 (2022).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121786 ↗
76. Zhang, X. et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: Recent trends and emerging strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater.10, 15–31 (2022).
77. Wang, Y. H. et al. Reduced inflammatory cell recruitment and tissue damage in spinal cord injury by acellular spinal cord scaffold seeded with mesenchymal stem cells. Exp. therapeutic Med. 13, 203–207 (2017).10.3892/etm.2016.3941 ↗
78. Xing, H., Ren, X., Yin, H., Sun, C. & Jiang, T. Construction of a NT-3 sustained-release system cross-linked with an acellular spinal cord scaffold and its effects on differentiation of cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 104, 109902 (2019).10.1016/j.msec.2019.109902 ↗
79. Jiang, T. et al. Preparation and characterization of genipin-crosslinked rat acellular spinal cord scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C., Mater. Biol. Appl. 33, 3514–3521 (2013).10.1016/j.msec.2013.04.046 ↗
80. Ma, Y. H. et al. Developing a mechanically matched decellularized spinal cord scaffold for the in situ matrix-based neural repair of spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 279, 121192 (2021).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121192 ↗
81. Vishwakarma, S. K., Bardia, A., Lakkireddy, C., Paspala, S. A. B. & Khan, A. A. Bioengineering human neurological constructs using decellularized meningeal scaffolds for application in spinal cord injury. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 150 (2018).10.3389/fbioe.2018.00150 ↗
82. Bai, Y. R. et al. Decellularized optic nerve functional scaffold transplant facilitates directional axon regeneration and remyelination in the injured white matter of the rat spinal cord. Neural Regen. Res. 16, 2276–2283 (2021).10.4103/1673-5374.310696 ↗
83. Shu, B. et al. Restoring electrical connection using a conductive biomaterial provides a new therapeutic strategy for rats with spinal cord injury. Neurosci. Lett. 692, 33–40 (2019).10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.031 ↗
84. Ling-ling, W. et al. Preparation and biocompatibility of an electroactive polyaniline/poly (lactic-acid) scaffold. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 22, 3557 (2018).
85. Zhou, L. et al. Soft conducting polymer hydrogels cross-linked and doped by tannic acid for spinal cord injury repair. ACS Nano 12, 10957–10967 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b04609 ↗
86. Wu, E. C., Zhang, S. & Hauser, C. A. Self‐assembling peptides as cell‐interactive scaffolds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 456–468 (2012).10.1002/adfm.201101905 ↗
87. Raspa, A., Carminati, L., Pugliese, R., Fontana, F. & Gelain, F. Self-assembling peptide hydrogels for the stabilization and sustained release of active Chondroitinase ABC in vitro and in spinal cord injuries. J. Control. Rel. 330, 1208–1219 (2021).10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.027 ↗
88. Wang, J. et al. FGL-functionalized self-assembling nanofiber hydrogel as a scaffold for spinal cord-derived neural stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C., Mater. Biol. Appl. 46, 140–147 (2015).10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.019 ↗
89. Hong, J. Y. et al. Self-assembling peptide gels promote angiogenesis and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. J. Tissue Eng. 13, 20417314221086491 (2022).
90. Yang, B. et al. Graphene oxide-composited chitosan scaffold contributes to functional recovery of injured spinal cord in rats. Neural Regen. Res 16, 1829–1835 (2021).10.4103/1673-5374.306095 ↗
91. Bussy, C., Ali-Boucetta, H. & Kostarelos, K. Safety considerations for graphene: lessons learnt from carbon nanotubes. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 692–701 (2013).10.1021/ar300199e ↗
92. González-Mayorga, A. et al. Favorable biological responses of neural cells and tissue interacting with graphene oxide microfibers. ACS Omega 2, 8253–8263 (2017).10.1021/acsomega.7b01354 ↗
93. Usmani, S. et al. Functional rewiring across spinal injuries via biomimetic nanofiber scaffolds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25212–25218 (2020).10.1073/pnas.2005708117 ↗
94. Li, L. et al. A MnO(2) nanoparticle-dotted hydrogel promotes spinal cord repair via regulating reactive oxygen species microenvironment and synergizing with mesenchymal stem cells. ACS nano 13, 14283–14293 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b07598 ↗
95. Zhai, H. et al. Mechanically strengthened hybrid peptide-polyester hydrogel and potential applications in spinal cord injury repair. Biomed. Mater. 15, 055031 (2020).10.1088/1748-605X/ab9e45 ↗
96. Luo, J. et al. An injectable and self-healing hydrogel with controlled release of curcumin to repair spinal cord injury. Bioact. Mater. 6, 4816–4829 (2021).
97. Chiang, M. Y. et al. 4D spatiotemporal modulation of biomolecules distribution in anisotropic corrugated microwrinkles via electrically manipulated microcapsules within hierarchical hydrogel for spinal cord regeneration. Biomaterials 271, 120762 (2021).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120762 ↗
98. Ahmed, E. M. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J. Adv. Res. 6, 105–121 (2015).10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 ↗
99. Abdulghani, S. & Mitchell, G. R. Biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration: a review. Biomolecules 9, 750 (2019).10.3390/biom9110750 ↗
100. Ehsanipour, A. et al. Injectable, macroporous scaffolds for delivery of therapeutic genes to the injured spinal cord. APL Bioeng. 5, 016104 (2021).10.1063/5.0035291 ↗