Fractionation of cellulose nanocrystals: enhancing liquid crystal ordering without promoting gelation
Source abstract
Abstract
Colloids of electrically charged nanorods can spontaneously develop a fluid yet ordered liquid crystal phase, but this ordering competes with a tendency to form a gel of percolating rods. The threshold for ordering is reduced by increasing the rod aspect ratio, but the percolation threshold is also reduced with this change; hence, prediction of the outcome is nontrivial. Here, we show that by establishing the phase behavior of suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) fractionated according to length, an increased aspect ratio can strongly favor liquid crystallinity without necessarily influencing gelation. Gelation is instead triggered by increasing the counterion concentration until the CNCs lose colloidal stability, triggering linear aggregation, which promotes percolation regardless of the original rod aspect ratio. Our results shine new light on the competition between liquid crystal formation and gelation in nanoparticle suspensions and provide a path for enhanced control of CNC self-organization for applications in photonic crystal paper or advanced composites. The shape of nanoscale cellulose rods determines how they self-organize when suspended in water, show scientists in Luxembourg and the UK. Many interdependent factors determine whether the rods organize into a so-called liquid crystal state, dynamic and responsive, or if they are pinned in an immobile static gel. This makes it difficult to establish a clear understanding of the self-organization process. Jan Lagerwall from the University of Luxembourg and co-workers simplified the analysis by investigating a colloidal suspension of cellulose nanocrystals that spontaneously separates into rods of different length. They showed that colloids with a larger aspect ratio (the length of the nanorod divided by its diameter), favor a liquid-crystal state, but—contrary to expectation—they do this without promoting gelation. Such control of the self-organization of cellulose nanoparticles could enable more advanced composite materials. Fractionating nanorod suspensions by aspect ratio strongly affects liquid crystal formation without affecting gelation, in contrast to expectations from the classic percolation-based model. Gelation is rather triggered by increasing the counterion concentration until the CNCs lose colloidal stability. As a consequence, we significantly extend the regime where we can study equilibrium liquid crystal behavior without risking arrest into a gel state.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Bawden, F. C., Pirie, N. W., Bernal, J. D. & Fankuchen, I. Liquid crystalline substances from virus-infected plants. Nature 138, 1051–1052 (1936).10.1038/1381051a0 ↗
2. Thorkelsson, K., Bai, P. & Xu, T. Self-assembly and applications of anisotropic nanomaterials: a review. Nano Today 10, 48–66 (2015).10.1016/j.nantod.2014.12.005 ↗
3. Njuguna, J., Pielichowski, K. & Desai, S. Nanofiller-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 19, 947–959 (2008).10.1002/pat.1074 ↗
4. Trache, D., Hussin, M. H., Haafiz, M. K. & Thakur, V. K. Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 9, 1763–1786 (2017).10.1039/C6NR09494E ↗
5. Giese, M., Blusch, L. K., Khan, M. K. & MacLachlan, M. J. Functional materials from cellulose-derived liquid-crystal templates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2888–2910 (2015).10.1002/anie.201407141 ↗
6. Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater. Today 16, 220–227 (2013).10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004 ↗
7. Klemm, D. et al. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-basedmaterials. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 50, 5438–5466 (2011).10.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
8. Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M. & Cranston, E. D. Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: from the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir 33, 1583–1598 (2017).10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 ↗
9. Guidetti, G., Atifi, S., Vignolini, S. & Hamad, W. Y. Flexible photonic cellulose nanocrystal films. Adv. Mater. 28, 10042–10047 (2016).10.1002/adma.201603386 ↗
10. Jacoby, M. Nano from the forest. Chem. Eng. News 92, 9–12 (2014).
11. Usov, I. et al. Understanding nanocellulose chirality and structure-properties relationship at the single fibril level. Nat. Commun. 6, 7564 (2015).10.1038/ncomms8564 ↗
12. Cherhal, F., Cousin, F. & Capron, I. Influence of charge density and ionic strength on the aggregation process of cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous suspension, as revealed by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 31, 5596–5602 (2015).10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00851 ↗
13. Fernandes, S. N. et al. Mind the microgap in iridescent cellulose nanocrystal films. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603560 (2017).10.1002/adma.201603560 ↗
14. Dumanli, A. G. et al. Controlled, bio-inspired self-assembly of cellulose-based chiral reflectors. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2, 646–650 (2014).10.1002/adom.201400112 ↗
15. Lagerwall, J. P. F. et al. Cellulose nanocrystal-based materials: from liquid crystal self-assembly and glass formation to multifunctional thin films. NPG Asia Mater. 6, e80 (2014).10.1038/am.2013.69 ↗
16. Onsager, L. The effects of shape on the interaction of colloidal particles. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 627–659 (1949).10.1111/j.1749-6632.1949.tb27296.x ↗
17. Dong, X. M., Kimura, T., Revol, J. F. & Gray, D. G. Effects of ionic strength on the isotropic-chiral nematic phase transition of suspensions of cellulose crystallites. Langmuir 12, 2076–2082 (1996).10.1021/la950133b ↗
18. Park, J. H. et al. Macroscopic control of helix orientation in films dried from cholesteric liquid-crystalline cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Chemphyschem 15, 1477–1484 (2014).10.1002/cphc.201400062 ↗
19. Honorato-Rios, C. et al. Equilibrium liquid crystal phase diagrams and detection of kinetic arrest in cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Front. Mater. 3, 21 (2016). ARTN.10.3389/fmats.2016.00021 ↗
20. Bruckner, J. R., Kuhnhold, A., Honorato-Rios, C., Schilling, T. & Lagerwall, J. P. Enhancing self-assembly in cellulose nanocrystal suspensions using high-permittivity solvents. Langmuir 32, 9854–9862 (2016).10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02647 ↗
21. Shafiei-Sabet, S., Hamad, W. Y. & Hatzikiriakos, S. G. Ionic strength effects on the microstructure and shear rheology of cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Cellulose 21, 3347–3359 (2014).10.1007/s10570-014-0407-z ↗
22. Urena-Benavides, E. E., Ao, G., Davis, V. A. & Kitchens, C. L. Rheology and phase behavior of lyotropic cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Macromolecules 44, 8990–8998 (2011).10.1021/ma201649f ↗
23. Hough, L., Islam, M., Janmey, P. & Yodh, A. Viscoelasticity of single wall carbon nanotube suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 168102 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.168102 ↗
24. Schütz, C. et al. Rod packing in chiral nematic cellulose nanocrystal dispersions studied by small-angle X-ray scattering and laser diffraction. Langmuir 31, 6507–6513 (2015).10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00924 ↗
25. Odijk, T. & Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Theory of the isotropic-liquid crystal phase separation for a solution of bidisperse rodlike macromolecules. J. Phys. Chem. 89, 2090–2096 (1985).10.1021/j100256a058 ↗
26. Zhang, S. J., Kinloch, I. A. & Windle, A. H. Mesogenicity drives fractionation in lyotropic aqueous suspensions of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Nano. Lett. 6, 568–572 (2006).10.1021/nl0521322 ↗
27. Dong, X. M., Revol, J. F. & Gray, D. G. Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5, 19–32 (1998).10.1023/A:1009260511939 ↗
28. Hu, Y. & Abidi, N. Distinct chiral nematic self-assembling behavior caused by different size-unified cellulose nanocrystals via a multistage separation. Langmuir 32, 9863–9872 (2016).10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02861 ↗
29. Fall, A. B., Lindström, S. B., Sundman, O., Ödberg, L. & Wågberg, L. Colloidal stability of aqueous nanofibrillated cellulose dispersions. Langmuir 27, 11332–11338 (2011).10.1021/la201947x ↗
30. Peddireddy, K. R., Capron, I., Nicolai, T. & Benyahia, L. Gelation kinetics and network structure of cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous solution. Biomacromolecules 17, 3298–3304 (2016).10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01061 ↗
31. Chau, M. et al. Ion-mediated gelation of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 16, 2455–2462 (2015).10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00701 ↗
32. Winter, H. H. Gel point. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2016).10.1002/0471440264.pst476.pub2 ↗
33. Shafiei-Sabet, S., Hamad, W. Y. & Hatzikiriakos, S. G. Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28, 17124–17133 (2012).10.1021/la303380v ↗
34. Cherhal, F., Cathala, B. & Capron, I. Surface charge density variation to promote structural orientation of cellulose nanocrystals. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30, 126–131 (2015).10.3183/NPPRJ-2015-30-01-p126-131 ↗
35. Varghese, A., Rajesh, R. & Vemparala, S. Aggregation of rod-like polyelectrolyte chains in the presence of monovalent counterions. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 234901 (2012).10.1063/1.4771920 ↗
36. Zhou, S. Density functional analysis of like-charged attraction between two similarly charged cylinder polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 29, 12490–12501 (2013).10.1021/la402860r ↗
37. Israelachvili, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. 3rd (Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA, 2010).
38. Russel, W. B., Saville, D. A. & Schowalter, W. R. Colloidal dispersions (Cambridge university press, CA, USA, 1989).10.1017/CBO9780511608810 ↗
39. Pezeshkian, W., Nikoofard, N., Norouzi, D., Mohammad-Rafiee, F. & Fazli, H. Distribution of counterions and interaction between two similarly charged dielectric slabs: roles of charge discreteness and dielectric inhomogeneity. Phys. Rev. E 85, 061925 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevE.85.061925 ↗
40. Jho, Y. S., Park, G., Chang, C. S., Pincus, P. & Kim, M. W. Interaction between two inhomogeneously charged parallel surfaces in the strong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. E 73, 021502 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevE.73.021502 ↗
41. Naji, A., Jungblut, S., Moreira, A. G. & Netz, R. R. Electrostatic interactions in strongly coupled soft matter. Phys. A 352, 131–170 (2005).10.1016/j.physa.2004.12.029 ↗
42. Moreira, A. G. & Netz, R. R. Counterions at charge-modulated substrates. EPL 57, 911 (2002).10.1209/epl/i2002-00597-2 ↗
43. Osipov, M. A., Teixeira, P. I. & Telo da Gama, M. M. Structure of strongly dipolar fluids at low densities. Phys. Rev. E 54, 2597–2609 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2597 ↗
44. Schilling, T., Miller, M. A. & Van der Schoot, P. Percolation in suspensions of hard nanoparticles: From spheres to needles. EPL 111, 56004 (2015).10.1209/0295-5075/111/56004 ↗
45. Dixit, M., Meyer, H. & Schilling, T. Connectivity percolation in suspensions of attractive square-well spherocylinders. Phys. Rev. E 93, 012116 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012116 ↗
46. Kang, K. & Dhont, J. K. G. Glass transition in suspensions of charged rods: structural arrest and texture dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 015901 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.015901 ↗