Premature failure of an additively manufactured material
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Additively manufactured metallic materials exhibit excellent mechanical strength. However, they often fail prematurely owing to external defects (pores and unmelted particles) that act as sites for crack initiation. Cracks then propagate through grain boundaries and/or cellular boundaries that contain continuous brittle second phases. In this work, the premature failure mechanisms in selective laser melted (SLM) materials were studied. A submicron structure was introduced in a SLM Ag–Cu–Ge alloy that showed semicoherent precipitates distributed in a discontinuous but periodic fashion along the cellular boundaries. This structure led to a remarkable strength of 410 ± 3 MPa with 16 ± 0.5% uniform elongation, well surpassing the strength-ductility combination of their cast and annealed counterparts. The hierarchical SLM microstructure with a periodic arrangement of precipitates and a high density of internal defects led to a high strain hardening rate and strong strengthening, as evidenced by the fact that the precipitates were twinned and encircled by a high density of internal defects, such as dislocations, stacking faults and twins. However, the samples fractured before necking owing to the crack acceleration along the external defects. This work provides an approach for additively manufacturing materials with an ultrahigh strength combined with a high ductility provided that premature failure is alleviated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Barriobero-Vila, P. et al. Peritectic titanium alloys for 3D printing. Nat. Commun. 9, 3426 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-05819-9 ↗
2. MacDonald, E. & Wicker, R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science 353, 1512 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf2093 ↗
3. Tofail, S. A. M. et al. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater. Today 21, 22–37 (2018).10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
4. DebRoy, T. et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 92, 112–224 (2018).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
5. Gu, D. D., Meiners, W., Wissenbach, K. & Poprawe, R. Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int. Mater. Rev. 57, 133–164 (2012).10.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014 ↗
6. Wang, Y. M. et al. Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat. Mater. 17, 63–70 (2018).10.1038/nmat5021 ↗
7. Prashanth, K. G., Scudino, S. & Eckert, J. Defining the tensile properties of Al-12Si parts produced by selective laser melting. Acta Mater. 126, 25–35 (2017).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.044 ↗
8. Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E. & Emmelmann, C. Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 117, 371–392 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
9. Martin, J. H. et al. 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys. Nature 549, 365–369 (2017).10.1038/nature23894 ↗
10. Delahaye, J. et al. Influence of Si precipitates on fracture mechanisms of AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting. Acta Mater. 175, 160–170 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.06.013 ↗
11. Prashanth, K. G. Work hardening in selective laser melted Al-12Si alloy. Mater. Des. Process. Comm. 1, e46 (2019).
12. Prashanth, K. G. & Eckert, J. Formation of metastable cellular microstructures in selective laser melted alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 707, 27–34 (2017).10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.209 ↗
13. Chen, B. et al. Strength and strain hardening of a selective laser melted AlSi10Mg alloy. Scr. Mater. 141, 45–49 (2017).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.07.025 ↗
14. Li, Z. et al. Tensile properties, strain rate sensitivity, and activation volume of additively manufactured 316L stainless steels. Int. J. Plast. 120, 395–410 (2019).10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.009 ↗
15. Chen, W. et al. Microscale residual stresses in additively manufactured stainless steel. Nat. Commun. 10, 4338 (2019).
16. Akhmetova, A. M. et al. Experimental investigations of the Ag-Cu-Ge system. J. Alloy. Compd. 630, 74–77 (2015).10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.028 ↗
17. Liu, X. et al. High-order hierarchical nanotwins with superior strength and ductility. Acta Mater. 149, 397–406 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.047 ↗
18. Scudino, S. et al. Additive manufacturing of Cu-10Sn bronze. Mater. Lett. 156, 202–204 (2015).10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.076 ↗
19. Hayes, F. H., Lukas, H. L., Effenberg, G. & Petzow, G. A thermodynamic optimization of the Cu–Ag–Pd system. Z. Metallkd. 77, 749–754 (1986).
20. Duwez, P., Willens, R. H. & Klement, W. Jr Continuous series of metastable solid solutions in silver‐copper alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1136–1137 (1960).10.1063/1.1735777 ↗
21. Spreadborough, J. & Christian, J. W. High-temperature X-ray diffractometer. J. Sci. Instrum. 36, 116 (1959).10.1088/0950-7671/36/3/302 ↗
22. Yin, J. et al. Effects of the partial substitutional alloying elements on the crystallization behavior of Mg65Cu25Gd10 metallic glass: Ag versus Ni. J. Alloy. Compd. 481, 407–410 (2009).10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.010 ↗
23. Burkhardt, W. & Schubert, K. Uber messingartige Phasen mit A3-verwandter Struktur. Z. Metallkd. 50, 442–452 (1959).
24. Schubert, K. & Brandauer, G. Zum aufbau des systems kupfer-germanium. Z. Metallkd. 43, 262–268 (1952).
25. Prashanth, K. G. et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-12Si produced by selective laser melting: effect of heat treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 590, 153–160 (2014).10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.023 ↗
26. Li, W. et al. Generalized stacking fault energies of alloys. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 265005 (2014).10.1088/0953-8984/26/26/265005 ↗
27. Sun, Z., Tan, X., Tor, S. B. & Chua, C. K. Simultaneously enhanced strength and ductility for 3D-printed stainless steel 316L by selective laser melting. NPG Asia Mater. 10, 127–136 (2018).10.1038/s41427-018-0018-5 ↗
28. Liu, L. et al. Dislocation network in additive manufactured steel breaks strength – ductility trade-off. Mater. Today 21, 354–361 (2018).10.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.004 ↗
29. Jung, H. Y. et al. Fabrication of Fe-based bulk metallic glass by selective laser melting: A parameter study. Mater. Des. 86, 703–708 (2015).10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.145 ↗
30. Specification, S. Standard specification for 75% silver, 24.5% copper, 0.5% nickel electrical. Contact ASTM Int. 98, 98–100 (2010).
31. Tian, Y. Z. et al. Microstructures, strengthening mechanisms and fracture behavior of Cu-Ag alloys processed by high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater. 60, 269–281 (2012).10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.058 ↗
32. Tian, Y. Z. & Zhang, Z. F. Bulk eutectic Cu-Ag alloys with abundant twin boundaries. Scr. Mater. 66, 65–68 (2012).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.024 ↗
33. Chairuangsri, T. & Nisaratanaporn, E. Effects of beryllium on microstructure and resiliency of silver-copper alloy. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 37, 260–268 (2010).
34. Nisaratanaporn, E., Wongsriruksa, S., Pongsukitwat, S. & Lothongkum, G. Study on the microstructure, mechanical properties, tarnish and corrosion resistance of sterling silver alloyed with manganese. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 445–446, 663–668 (2007).10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.106 ↗
35. Nisaratanaporn, S. & Nisaratanaporn, E. The anti-tarnishing, microstructure analysis and mechanical properties of sterling silver with silicon addition. J. Met. Mater. Min. 12, 13–18 (2003).
36. Wang, Z. et al. Hybrid nanostructured aluminum alloy with super-high strength. NPG Asia Mater. 7, e229 (2015).
37. Shao, C. et al. Architecture of high-strength aluminum-matrix composites processed by a novel microcasting technique. NPG Asia Mater. 11, 69 (2019).10.1038/s41427-019-0174-2 ↗
38. Zhao, Y. H., Liao, X. Z., Cheng, S., Ma, E. & Zhu, Y. T. Simultaneously increasing the ductility and strength of nanostructured alloys. Adv. Mater. 18, 2280–2283 (2006).10.1002/adma.200600310 ↗
39. Campbell, J. E., Thompson, R. P., Dean, J. & Clyne, T. W. Comparison between stress-strain plots obtained from indentation plastometry, based on residual indent profiles, and from uniaxial testing. Acta Mater. 168, 87–99 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.006 ↗
40. Picak, S. et al. Anomalous work hardening behavior of Fe40Mn40Cr10Co10 high entropy alloy single crystals deformed by twinning and slip. Acta Mater. 181, 555–569 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.048 ↗
41. Laplanche, G., Kostka, A., Horst, O. M., Eggeler, G. & George, E. P. Microstructure evolution and critical stress for twinning in the CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 118, 152–163 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.038 ↗
42. Akbarpour, M. R. & Ekrami, A. Effect of ferrite volume fraction on work hardening behavior of high bainite dual phase (DP) steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 477, 306–310 (2008).10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.051 ↗
43. Wang, Y. et al. A low-alloy high-carbon martensite steel with 2.6 GPa tensile strength and good ductility. Acta Mater. 158, 247–256 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.060 ↗
44. Gubicza, J. et al. Microstructure and yield strength of severely deformed silver. Scr. Mater. 58, 775–778 (2008).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.12.028 ↗
45. Jian, W. W. et al. Ultrastrong Mg alloy via nano-spaced stacking faults. Mater. Res. Lett. 1, 61–66 (2013).10.1080/21663831.2013.765927 ↗
46. Gladman, T. Precipitation hardening in metals. Mater. Sci. Technol. 15, 30–36 (1999).10.1179/026708399773002782 ↗
47. Smith, D. R. & Fickett, F. R. Low-temperature properties of silver. J. Res. Natl Inst. Stand. Technol. 100, 119–171 (1995).10.6028/jres.100.012 ↗
48. He, J. Y. et al. A precipitation-hardened high-entropy alloy with outstanding tensile properties. Acta Mater. 102, 187–196 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.076 ↗
49. Calcagnotto, M., Ponge, D., Demir, E. & Raabe, D. Orientation gradients and geometrically necessary dislocations in ultrafine grained dual-phase steels studied by 2D and 3D EBSD. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 527, 2738–2746 (2010).10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.004 ↗