journal article·2019-12Open access

Organic piezoelectric materials: milestones and potential

Sarah Guerin, Syed A. M. Tofail, Damien Thompson

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Research on the piezoelectric response of biomolecules has intensified following demonstration of open circuit voltages of over 20 V in biopiezoelectric generators. Organic piezoelectric nanotubes, fibers, and micro-islands have been grown and studied; however, the lack of fundamental understanding of the piezoelectric effect in nature hinders the rational design of biomaterials to provide a tailor-made piezoelectric response. Advances in high performance computing have facilitated the use of quantum mechanical calculations to predict the full piezoelectric tensor of biomolecular crystals, including amino acids and small peptides. By identifying directions of high piezoelectric response, the simulations can guide experimental crystal growth, device fabrication and electrical testing, which have led to the demonstration of unprecedented piezoelectric responses in organic crystals on the order of 200 pC/N. These large responses arise from strong supramolecular dipoles, which can be tuned by molecular chemistry and packing, opening new opportunities for the realization of technologically useful piezoelectric devices from renewable materials. The amino acids predicted to exhibit the highest piezoelectric response, such as glycine, hydroxyproline and lysine, are anticipated to be used to engineer highly piezoelectric peptides in the future. With improved scaling of advanced computational methods, such as density functional perturbation theory, the research community can begin to efficiently screen peptide structures for enhanced electromechanical properties. This capability will accelerate the experimental development of devices and provide much-needed insight into the evolution of a hierarchical relation in biological materials starting from strongly piezoelectric building blocks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Cephalopods and Marine Biology · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Bystrov, V., Seyedhosseini, E., Kopyl, S., Bdikin, I. & Kholkin, A. Piezoelectricity and ferroelectricity in biomaterials: molecular modeling and piezoresponse force microscopy measurements. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 066803 (2014).10.1063/1.4891443 ↗
2. Fukada, E. History and recent progress in piezoelectric polymers. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control, IEEE Trans. 47, 1277–1290 (2000).10.1109/58.883516 ↗
3. Fukada, E. Bioelectrets and biopiezoelectricity. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 27, 813–819 (1992).10.1109/14.155803 ↗
4. Shikinami, Y. & Okuno, M. Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly L-lactide (PLLA). Part II: practical properties of miniscrews and miniplates. Biomaterials 22, 3197–3211 (2001).10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00072-2 ↗
5. Lobl, H. et al. in Ultrasonics Symposium, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE. 1031–1036 (IEEE).
6. Aizen, R., Tao, K., Rencus-Lazar, S. & Gazit, E. Functional metabolite assemblies—a review. J. Nanopart. Res. 20, 125 (2018).10.1007/s11051-018-4217-3 ↗
7. Shrout, T. R. & Zhang, S. J. Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics: alternatives for PZT? J. Electroceram. 19, 113–126 (2007).10.1007/s10832-007-9047-0 ↗
8. Chorsi, M. T. et al. Piezoelectric biomaterials for sensors and actuators. Adv. Mater. 1802084 (2018).10.1002/adma.201802084 ↗
9. Wei, H. et al. An overview of lead-free piezoelectric materials and devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 12446–12467 (2018).
10. Lee, B. Y. et al. Virus-based piezoelectric energy generation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 351–356 (2012).10.1038/nnano.2012.69 ↗
11. Ghosh, S. K. & Mandal, D. Bio-assembled, piezoelectric prawn shell made self-powered wearable sensor for non-invasive physiological signal monitoring. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 123701 (2017).10.1063/1.4979081 ↗
12. Ghosh, S. K. & Mandal, D. Efficient natural piezoelectric nanogenerator: electricity generation from fish swim bladder. Nano Energy 28, 356–365 (2016).10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.030 ↗
13. Seyedhosseini, E. et al. Self-assembly of organic ferroelectrics by evaporative dewetting: a case of β-glycine. ACS Appl. Mater. & Interfaces 9, 20029–20037 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b02952 ↗
14. Ico, G., Myung, A., Kim, B. S., Myung, N. V. & Nam, J. Transformative piezoelectric enhancement of P (VDF-TrFE) synergistically driven by nanoscale dimensional reduction and thermal treatment. Nanoscale 10, 2894–2901 (2017).10.1039/C7NR08296G ↗
15. Wang, Z. L. & Song, J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 312, 242–246 (2006).10.1126/science.1124005 ↗
16. Song, X. et al. Enhanced piezoelectric effect at the edges of stepped molybdenum disulfide nanosheets. Nanoscale 9, 6237–6245 (2017).10.1039/C6NR09275F ↗
17. Collins, J., Hagon, P. & Pulliam, G. Evaluation of new single crystal piezoelectric materials for surface acoustic-wave applications. Ultrasonics 8, 218–226 (1970).10.1016/0041-624X(70)91038-3 ↗
18. Williams, P. A., Hughes, C. E. & Harris, K. D. L-Lysine: exploiting powder X-ray diffraction to complete the set of crystal structures of the 20 directly encoded proteinogenic amino acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3973–3977 (2015).10.1002/anie.201411520 ↗
19. Moitra, S. & Kar, T. Growth and characterization of L-valine-a nonlinear optical crystal. Cryst. Res. Technol. 45, 70–74 (2010).10.1002/crat.200900447 ↗
20. Stapleton, A. et al. The direct piezoelectric effect in the globular protein lysozyme. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 142902 (2017).10.1063/1.4997446 ↗
21. Bdikin, I. et al. Local piezoresponse and polarization switching in nucleobase thymine microcrystals. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 072007 (2015).10.1063/1.4927806 ↗
22. Jones, R. O. Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 897–923 (2015).10.1103/RevModPhys.87.897 ↗
23. Lemanov, V. Piezoelectric and pyroelectric properties of protein amino acids as basic materials of soft state physics. Ferroelectrics 238, 211–218 (2000).10.1080/00150190008008786 ↗
24. Görbitz, C. H., Törnroos, K. W. & Day, G. M. Single-crystal investigation of l-tryptophan with Z′=16. Acta Crystallogr. B 68, 549–557 (2012).10.1107/S0108768112033484 ↗
25. Boldyreva, E. et al. Polymorphism of glycine, Part I. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 73, 409–418 (2003).10.1023/A:1025405508035 ↗
26. Guerin, S. et al. Control of piezoelectricity in amino acids by supramolecular packing. Nat. Mater. 17, 180 (2017).10.1038/nmat5045 ↗
27. Guerin, S., Syed, T. A. & Thompson, D. Deconstructing collagen piezoelectricity using alanine-hydroxyproline-glycine building blocks. Nanoscale 10, 9653–9663 (2018).10.1039/C8NR01634H ↗
28. Lemanov, V. Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of protein amino acids and their compounds. Phys. Solid State 54, 1841–1842 (2012).10.1134/S1063783412090168 ↗
29. Guerin, S et al. Racemic amino acid piezoelectric transducer. Phys. Rev. Lett. accepted (2019).10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.047701 ↗
30. Vasilescu, D., Cornillon, R. & Mallet, G. Piezoelectric resonances in amino-acids. Nature 225, 635 (1970).10.1038/225635a0 ↗
31. Delfino, M. A comprehensive optical second harmonic generation study of the non-centrosymmetric character of biological structures. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 52, 271–284 (1979).10.1080/00268947908071745 ↗
32. Sil’vestrova, I. et al. Elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric properties of LAP crystals. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 37, 831–834 (1992).
33. Ikeda, T., Tanaka, Y. & Toyoda, H. Piezoelectric properties of triglycine-sulphate. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1, 13 (1962).10.1143/JJAP.1.13 ↗
34. Meirzadeh, E. et al. Origin and structure of polar domains in doped molecular crystals. Nat. Commun. 7, 13351 (2016).
35. Kelly, C. M. et al. Conformational dynamics and aggregation behavior of piezoelectric diphenylalanine peptides in an external electric field. Biophys. Chem. 196, 16–24 (2015).10.1016/j.bpc.2014.08.009 ↗
36. Kholkin, A., Amdursky, N., Bdikin, I., Gazit, E. & Rosenman, G. Strong piezoelectricity in bioinspired peptide nanotubes. ACS nano 4, 610–614 (2010).10.1021/nn901327v ↗
37. Esin, A. et al. Pyroelectric effect and polarization instability in self-assembled diphenylalanine microtubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 142902 (2016).10.1063/1.4962652 ↗
38. Jenkins, K., Kelly, S., Nguyen, V., Wu, Y. & Yang, R. Piezoelectric diphenylalanine peptide for greatly improved flexible nanogenerators. Nano Energy, 51, 317–323 (2018).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.061 ↗
39. Karan, S. K. et al. A new insight towards eggshell membrane as high energy conversion efficient bio-piezoelectric energy harvester. Mater. Today Energy 9, 114–125 (2018).10.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.006 ↗
40. Karan, S. K. et al. Nature driven spider silk as high energy conversion efficient bio-piezoelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 49, 655–666 (2018).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.014 ↗
41. Nguyen, V., Zhu, R., Jenkins, K. & Yang, R. Self-assembly of diphenylalanine peptide with controlled polarization for power generation. Nat. Commun. 7, 13566 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13566 ↗
42. Ghosh, S. K. & Mandal, D. High-performance bio-piezoelectric nanogenerator made with fish scale. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 103701 (2016).10.1063/1.4961623 ↗
43. Hoque, N. A. et al. Biowaste crab shell-extracted chitin nanofiber-based superior piezoelectric nanogenerator. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 13848–13858 (2018).10.1039/C8TA04074E ↗
44. Lee, J.-H. et al. Diphenylalanine peptide nanotube energy harvesters. ACS nano 12, 8138–8144 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b03118 ↗