journal article·2018-04Open access

Tailoring force sensitivity and selectivity by microstructure engineering of multidirectional electronic skins

Jonghwa Park, Jinyoung Kim, Jaehyung Hong, Hochan Lee, Youngoh Lee, Seungse Cho, Sung-Woo Kim, Jae Joon Kim, Sung Youb Kim, Hyunhyub Ko

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 10· Issue 4

Abstract

Electronic skins (e-skins) with high sensitivity to multidirectional mechanical stimuli are crucial for healthcare monitoring devices, robotics, and wearable sensors. In this study, we present piezoresistive e-skins with tunable force sensitivity and selectivity to multidirectional forces through the engineered microstructure geometries (i.e., dome, pyramid, and pillar). Depending on the microstructure geometry, distinct variations in contact area and localized stress distribution are observed under different mechanical forces (i.e., normal, shear, stretching, and bending), which critically affect the force sensitivity, selectivity, response/relaxation time, and mechanical stability of e-skins. Microdome structures present the best force sensitivities for normal, tensile, and bending stresses. In particular, microdome structures exhibit extremely high pressure sensitivities over broad pressure ranges (47,062 kPa−1 in the range of <1 kPa, 90,657 kPa−1 in the range of 1–10 kPa, and 30,214 kPa−1 in the range of 10–26 kPa). On the other hand, for shear stress, micropillar structures exhibit the highest sensitivity. As proof-of-concept applications in healthcare monitoring devices, we show that our e-skins can precisely monitor acoustic waves, breathing, and human artery/carotid pulse pressures. Unveiling the relationship between the microstructure geometry of e-skins and their sensing capability would provide a platform for future development of high-performance microstructured e-skins. Customizing piezoresistive sensors with different microscale geometries makes it easier for ‘electronic skin’ devices to sense forces in different directions. Hyunhyub Ko and colleagues from South Korea’s Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology report that carbon nanotube/silicone elastomer composites fabricated into three shapes—micro-domes, pyramids, and pillars—have unique responses to mechanical stress and deformations. Experiments with interlocked pairs of micropatterned films revealed hemispherical shapes were best at sensing tensile and bending stresses, as well as minute changes to pressure. Micropillars, on the other hand, exhibited strong sensitivity to shear stress. With help from computer simulations, the researchers identified changes in contact area and localized stress as the critical factors needed to guide design of multidirectional force sensitivity. Prototype e-skin devices containing the interlocked microshapes successfully monitored bio-signals including breath patterns, spoken words, and arterial blood pressure. We present piezoresistive electronic skins with tunable force sensitivity and selectivity in response to multidirectional forces (normal, shear, tensile, bending) by engineering microstructure geometries (dome, pyramid, pillar). Microdome structures present the best force sensitivities for normal, tensile, and bending stresses. On the other hand, for shear stress, micropillar structures exhibit the highest sensitivity. As proof-of-concept demonstrations, the e-skins are used for wearable healthcare devices to precisely monitor various bio-signals including sound, human breath, and artery/carotid pulse pressures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Pang, C. et al. Highly skin-conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. Adv. Mater. 27, 634–640 (2015).10.1002/adma.201403807 ↗
2. Boutry, C. M. et al. A sensitive and biodegradable pressure sensor array for cardiovascular monitoring. Adv. Mater. 27, 6954–6961 (2015).10.1002/adma.201502535 ↗
3. Luo, N. et al. Flexible piezoresistive sensor patch enabling ultralow power cuffless blood pressure measurement. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 1178–1187 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201504560 ↗
4. Jeong, J. W. et al. Capacitive epidermal electronics for electrically safe, long-term electrophysiological measurements. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 3, 642–648 (2014).10.1002/adhm.201300334 ↗
5. Lochner, C. M., Khan, Y., Pierre, A. & Arias, A. C. All-organic optoelectronic sensor for pulse oximetry. Nat. Commun. 5, 5745–5751 (2014).10.1038/ncomms6745 ↗
6. Son, D. et al. Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 397–404 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.38 ↗
7. Liao, X. et al. Flexible and highly sensitive strain sensors fabricated by pencil drawn for wearable monitor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 2395–2401 (2015).10.1002/adfm.201500094 ↗
8. Liao, X. et al. A highly stretchable ZnO@ fiber-based multifunctional nanosensor for strain/temperature/UV detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 3074–3081 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201505223 ↗
9. Park, J., Lee, Y., Ha, M., Cho, S. & Ko, H. Micro/nanostructured surfaces for self-powered and multifunctional electronic skins. J. Mater. Chem. B. 4, 2999–3018 (2016).10.1039/C5TB02483H ↗
10. Bae, G. Y. et al. Linearly and highly pressure-sensitive electronic skin based on a bioinspired hierarchical structural array. Adv. Mater. 28, 5300–5306 (2016).10.1002/adma.201600408 ↗
11. Lee, K. Y. et al. Fully packaged self-powered triboelectric pressure sensor using hemispheres-array. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502566 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201502566 ↗
12. Shin, S.-H., Kim, Y.-H., Lee, M. H., Jung, J.-Y. & Nah, J. Hemispherically aggregated BaTiO3 nanoparticle composite thin film for high performance flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator. ACS Nano 8, 2766–2773 (2014).10.1021/nn406481k ↗
13. Mannsfeld, S. C. et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 9, 859–864 (2010).10.1038/nmat2834 ↗
14. Choong, C. L. et al. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv. Mater. 26, 3451–3458 (2014).10.1002/adma.201305182 ↗
15. Tee, B. C. K. et al. Tunable flexible pressure sensors using microstructured elastomer geometries for intuitive electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 5427–5434 (2014).10.1002/adfm.201400712 ↗
16. Pang, C. et al. A flexible and highly sensitive strain-gauge sensor using reversible interlocking of nanofibres. Nat. Mater. 11, 795–801 (2012).10.1038/nmat3380 ↗
17. Park, H. et al. Stretchable array of highly sensitive pressure sensors consisting of polyaniline nanofibers and Au-coated polydimethylsiloxane micropillars. ACS Nano 9, 9974–9985 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b03510 ↗
18. Maschmann, M. R. et al. Bioinspired carbon nanotube fuzzy fiber hair sensor for air-flow detection. Adv. Mater. 26, 3230–3234 (2014).10.1002/adma.201305285 ↗
19. Seol, M.-L. et al. Design strategy for a piezoelectric nanogenerator with a well-ordered nanoshell array. ACS Nano 7, 10773–10779 (2013).10.1021/nn403940v ↗
20. Chou, H.-H. et al. A chameleon-inspired stretchable electronic skin with interactive colour changing controlled by tactile sensing. Nat. Commun. 6, 8011–8020 (2015).10.1038/ncomms9011 ↗
21. Jang, D. et al. Force-assembled triboelectric nanogenerator with high-humidity-resistant electricity generation using hierarchical surface morphology. Nano Energy 20, 283–293 (2016).10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.021 ↗
22. Fan, F.-R. et al. Transparent triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered pressure sensors based on micropatterned plastic films. Nano Lett. 12, 3109–3114 (2012).10.1021/nl300988z ↗
23. Lee, J.-H. et al. Micropatterned P(VDF-TrFE) film-based piezoelectric nanogenerators for highly sensitive self-powered pressure sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 3203–3209 (2015).10.1002/adfm.201500856 ↗
24. Deng, W. et al. Microstructure-based interfacial tuning mechanism of capacitive pressure sensors for electronic skin. J. Sens. 2016, 8 (2016).10.1155/2016/2428305 ↗
25. Park, J. et al. Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multimodal electronic skins. ACS Nano 8, 4689–4697 (2014).10.1021/nn500441k ↗
26. Park, J. et al. Tactile-direction-sensitive and stretchable electronic skins based on human-skin-inspired interlocked microstructures. ACS Nano 8, 12020–12029 (2014).10.1021/nn505953t ↗
27. Park, J., Kim, M., Lee, Y., Lee, H. S. & Ko, H. Fingertip skin–inspired microstructured ferroelectric skins discriminate static/dynamic pressure and temperature stimuli. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500661 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500661 ↗
28. Park, J. et al. Ultrasensitive piezoresistive pressure sensors based on interlocked micropillar arrays. BioNanoSci 4, 349–355 (2014).10.1007/s12668-014-0151-8 ↗
29. Ruschau, G. R., Yoshikawa, S. & Newnham, R. E. Resistivities of conductive composites. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 953 (1992).10.1063/1.352350 ↗
30. Hu, N., Karube, Y., Yan, C., Masuda, Z. & Fukunaga, H. Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposite strain sensor. Acta Mater. 56, 2929–2936 (2008).10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
31. Fisher, J. C. & Giaever, I. Tunneling through thin insulating layers. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 172 (1961).10.1063/1.1735973 ↗
32. Huang, Z. et al. Pyramid microstructure with single walled carbon nanotubes for flexible and transparent micro-pressure sensor with ultra-high sensitivity. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 266, 345–351 (2017).10.1016/j.sna.2017.09.054 ↗
33. Simmons, J. G. Generalized formula for the electric tunnel effect between similar electrodes separated by a thin insulating film. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793–1803 (1963).10.1063/1.1702682 ↗
34. Zang, Y., Zhang, F., Di, C.-a. & Zhu, C. Advances of flexible pressure sensors toward artificial intelligence and health care applications. Mater. Horiz. 2, 140–156 (2015).10.1039/C4MH00147H ↗
35. Mitchell, G. F. et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women. Hypertension 43, 1239–1245 (2004).10.1161/01.HYP.0000128420.01881.aa ↗
36. Nichols, W. W. Clinical measurement of arterial stiffness obtained from noninvasive pressure waveforms. Am. J. Hypertens. 18, 3S–10S (2005).10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.10.009 ↗
37. Hirata, K., Yaginuma, T., O’Rourke, M. F. & Kawakami, M. Age-related changes in carotid artery flow and pressure pulses. Stroke 37, 2552–2556 (2006).10.1161/01.STR.0000242289.20381.f4 ↗