journal article·2026-07-07Open access

A rapid and low-cost route for characterizing heterogeneous fibrillar cellulose dispersions to support papermaking process control

Zahra Baneen, L. Daniel Söderberg, Tomas Rosén

Abstract

Abstract Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC), cellulose nanofibers (CNF), and their mixtures exhibit different optical responses under flow, but simple methods for tracking these differences in process-relevant conditions are limited. Here, we evaluate a compact polarized-flow imaging setup based on LED illumination, linear polarizers, a camera, and a simple flow cell, combined with principal component analysis (PCA) of image sequences. The aim is not to extract physical material parameters from the images, but to determine whether different suspension states can be reproducibly discriminated in a simple optical measurement. For two sample sets, varying either the MFC:CNF ratio or the CNF concentration produced distinct and repeatable clusters in PCA space. MFC-rich suspensions formed broader clusters consistent with greater optical heterogeneity, whereas CNF-rich suspensions formed tighter clusters. Rheological measurements were used as an independent comparison and showed that optically distinct states were also mechanically different. In a holdout demonstration, an unseen 1:1 mixture was projected to an intermediate region between reference clusters, and small intensity perturbations shifted the projected cluster position. These results show that simple polarized imaging can support state discrimination of MFC/CNF suspensions and may serve as a basis for future at-line monitoring or deviation detection in papermaking.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Fiber and Polymer Technology , KTH Royal Institute of Technology , SE-100 44 , Stockholm , Sweden

Wallenberg Wood Science Center , KTH Royal Institute of Technology , SE-100 44 , Stockholm , Sweden

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Benselfelt, T., Kummer, N., Nordenström, M., Fall, A.B., Nyström, G., and Wågberg, L. (2023). The colloidal properties of nanocellulose. ChemSusChem 16: e202201955, https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202201955.10.1002/cssc.202201955 ↗
2. Boufi, S., González, I., Delgado-Aguilar, M., Tarrès, Q., Pèlach, M.A., and Mutjé, P. (2016). Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 154: 151–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.117.10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.117 ↗
3. Bragone, F., Morozovska, K., Rosén, T., Laneryd, T., Söderberg, D., and Markidis, S. (2025). Automatic learning analysis of flow-induced birefringence in cellulose nanofibrils. J. Comput. Sci. 85: 102536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2025.102536.10.1016/j.jocs.2025.102536 ↗
4. Carlsson, A., Söderberg, L.D., and Lundell, F. (2010). Fibre orientation measurements near a headbox wall. Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 25: 204–212, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2010-25-02-p204-212.10.3183/npprj-2010-25-02-p204-212 ↗
5. Cinar Ciftci, G., Larsson, P.A., Riazanova, A.V., Øvrebø, H.H., Wågberg, L., and Berglund, L.A. (2020). Tailoring of rheological properties and structural polydispersity effects in microfibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 27: 9227–9241, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03438-6.10.1007/s10570-020-03438-6 ↗
6. Dimic-Misic, K., Gane, P.A.C., and Paltakari, J. (2013). Micro and nanofibrillated cellulose as a rheology modifier additive in CMC-containing pigment-coating formulations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52: 16066–16083, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4028878.10.1021/ie4028878 ↗
7. Geng, L., Mittal, N., Zhan, C., Ansari, F., Sharma, P.R., Peng, X., Hsiao, B.S., and Söderberg, L.D. (2018). Understanding the mechanistic behavior of highly charged cellulose nanofibers in aqueous systems. Macromolecules 51: 1498–1506, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02642.10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02642 ↗
8. Hubbe, M., Tayeb, P., Joyce, M., Tyagi, P., Kehoe, M., Dimic-Misic, K., and Pal, L. (2017). Rheology of nanocellulose-rich aqueous suspensions: a review. Bioresources 12: 9556–9661, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.Hubbe.10.15376/biores.12.4.Hubbe ↗
9. Håkansson, K.M.O., Fall, A.B., Lundell, F., Yu, S., Krywka, C., Roth, S.V., Santoro, G., Kvick, M., Prahl Wittberg, L., Wågberg, L., et al.. (2014). Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments. Nat. Commun. 5: 4018, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5018.10.1038/ncomms5018 ↗
10. Jollife, I.T. and Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374: 20150202, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
11. Larsson, P.A., Riazanova, A.V., Cinar Ciftci, G., Rojas, R., Øvrebø, H.H., Wågberg, L., and Berglund, L.A. (2019). Towards optimised size distribution in commercial microfibrillated cellulose: a fractionation approach. Cellulose 26: 1565–1575, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2214-4.10.1007/s10570-018-2214-4 ↗
12. Lavoine, N., Bras, J., and Desloges, I. (2014). Mechanical and barrier properties of cardboard and 3D packaging coated with microfibrillated cellulose. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131: app.40106, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40106.10.1002/app.40106 ↗
13. Lavoine, N., Desloges, I., Dufresne, A., and Bras, J. (2012). Microfibrillated cellulose – its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 90: 735–764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
14. Lever, J., Krzywinski, M., and Altman, N. (2017). Points of significance: principal component analysis. Nat. Methods 14: 641–642, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4346.10.1038/nmeth.4346 ↗
15. Li, M.-C., Wu, Q., Song, K., Lee, S., Qing, Y., and Wu, Y. (2015). Cellulose nanoparticles: structure-morphology-rheology relationships. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3: 821–832, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144.10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144 ↗
16. Li, Z., Liu, W., Guan, F., Li, G., Song, Z., Yu, D., Wang, H., and Liu, H. (2019). Using cellulose fibers to fabricate transparent paper by microfibrillation. Carbohydr. Polym. 214: 26–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.019.10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.019 ↗
17. Lloyd, S. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 28: 129–137, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489.10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 ↗
18. Lourenço, A.F., Godinho, D., Gamelas, J.A.F., Sarmento, P., and Ferreira, P.J.T. (2019). Carboxymethylated cellulose nanofibrils in papermaking: influence on filler retention and paper properties. Cellulose 26: 3489–3502, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02303-5.10.1007/s10570-019-02303-5 ↗
19. Lundell, F., Söderberg, L., and Alfredsson, P. (2011). Fluid mechanics of papermaking. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43: 195–217, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160700.10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160700 ↗
20. Mao, Y., Liu, K., Zhan, C., Geng, L., Chu, B., and Hsiao, B.S. (2017). Characterization of nanocellulose using small-angle neutron, x-ray, and dynamic light scattering techniques. J. Phys. Chem. B 121: 1340–1351, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11425.10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11425 ↗
21. Nechyporchuk, O., Belgacem, M.N., and Pignon, F. (2015). Concentration effect of tempo-oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose aqueous suspensions on the flow instabilities and small-angle x-ray scattering structural characterization. Cellulose 22: 2197–2210, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0640-0.10.1007/s10570-015-0640-0 ↗
22. Pääkko, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., Nykänen, A., Ahola, S., Österberg, M., Ruokolainen, J., Laine, J., Larsson, P.T., Ikkala, O., et al.. (2007). Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8: 1934–1941, https://doi.org/10.1021/bm061215p.10.1021/bm061215p ↗
23. Reynolds, D.A. (2009). Gaussian mixture models. Encycl. Biometrics 741: 3.10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_196 ↗
24. Rosén, T., He, H., Wang, R., Gordeyeva, K., Motezakker, A.R., Fluerasu, A., Söderberg, L.D., and Hsiao, B.S. (2023). Exploring nanofibrous networks with x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy through a digital twin. Phys. Rev. E 108: 014607, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.014607.10.1103/PhysRevE.108.014607 ↗
25. Rosén, T., Mittal, N., Roth, S.V., Zhang, P., Lundell, F., and Söderberg, L.D. (2020). Flow fields control nanostructural organization in semiflexible networks. Soft Matter 16: 5439–5449, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sm01975h.10.1039/C9SM01975H ↗
26. Rosén, T., Wang, R., He, H., Zhan, C., Chodankar, S., and Hsiao, B.S. (2021). Understanding ion-induced assembly of cellulose nanofibrillar gels through shear-free mixing and: in situ scanning-saxs. Nanoscale Adv. 3: 4940–4951, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1na00236h.10.1039/D1NA00236H ↗
27. Sarangi, S., Yatirajula, S.K., and Saxena, V.K. (2021). Evaluation of linear and nonlinear rheology of microfibrillated cellulose. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 18: 1401–1411, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-021-00505-w.10.1007/s11998-021-00505-w ↗
28. Sellman, F.A., Rostami, J., Östmans, R., Cortes Ruiz, M.F., Lindström, S.B., Wågberg, L., and Benselfelt, T. (2024). Influence of fibril aspect ratio, chemical functionality, and volume fraction on the mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibril materials. Cellulose 31: 8007–8025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-06084-4.10.1007/s10570-024-06084-4 ↗
29. Shinoda, R., Saito, T., Okita, Y., and Isogai, A. (2012). Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of tempo-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 13: 842–849, https://doi.org/10.1021/bm2017542.10.1021/bm2017542 ↗
30. Shlens, J. (2014). A tutorial on principal component analysis. arXiv Prepr. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.1100.
31. Sjölund, J., Westman, G., Wågberg, L., and Larsson, P.A. (2025). On the determination of charge and nitrogen content in cellulose fibres modified to contain quaternary amine functionality. Carbohydr. Polym. 347: 122734, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122734.10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122734 ↗
32. Thompson Towell, K. and Asenath-Smith, E. (2024). Low temperature effects on the rheological properties of aqueous cellulose nanofiber suspensions. Cellulose 31: 6091–6104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05965-y.10.1007/s10570-024-05965-y ↗
33. Van Gurp, M. (1995). The use of rotation matrices in the mathematical description of molecular orientations in polymers. Colloid Polym. Sci. 273: 607–625, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00652253.10.1007/BF00652253 ↗
34. Wold, S., Esbensen, K., and Geladi, P. (1987). Principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2: 37–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9.10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 ↗
35. Zhang, X., Kitin, P., Agarwal, U.P., Gleisner, R., and Zhu, J.Y. (2023). Characterizing lignin-containing microfibrillated cellulose based on water interactions, fibril properties, and imaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 316: 120996, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120996.10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120996 ↗