Hybrid soft sensor modeling for the wire section in tissue manufacturing: integrating first-principles and machine learning models
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Modeling and control of industrial processes are essential for product quality, energy efficiency, and operational stability. With growing sensor availability and computational power, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool. However, purely data-driven models often lack interpretability and robustness, especially under varying conditions. A key example is the wire section of a tissue machine, where basis weight is determined but not directly measurable in real time. To address this challenge, we propose a hybrid modeling framework that integrates a first-principles model (FPM) with a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (Conv1D) in a parallel structure. A secondary gated recurrent unit (GRU) network dynamically adjusts the weighting between the two predictions. Evaluated on seven months of industrial data, the hybrid model achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.12 g/m 2 , outperforming standalone FPM (4.72 g/m 2 ) and ML (2.68 g/m 2 ) models. Designed for real-time deployment, the approach provides a scalable soft-sensor solution, enabling earlier intervention and more adaptive operation in tissue manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut für Textiltechnik of RWTH Aachen University , Otto-Blumenthal-Straße 1, 52074 Aachen , Germany
ABB AG , Kallstadter Str. 1, 68309 Mannheim , Germany
Funding
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. ABB Ltd (2025). Paper machine wet end stability: the importance of accurate retention measurement, Online, Available at: https://new.abb.com/pulp-paper/abb-in-pulp-and-paper/articles/paper-machine-wet-end-stability-the-importance-of-accurate-retention-measurement.
2. Bikmukhametov, T. and Jäschke, J. (2020). Combining machine learning and process engineering physics towards enhanced accuracy and explainability of data-driven models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 138: 106834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106834.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106834 ↗
3. Chaffart, D. and Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2019). A hybrid modelling framework for improving soft sensor design and control performance in process systems. J. Process Control 84: 54–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.11.012.10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.11.012 ↗
4. Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 785–794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
5. Cho, B.U. (2005). Dynamics and control of retention and formation on a paper machine using a microparticulate retention aid system, Ph.D. thesis. University of British Columbia.
6. Gullichsen, J. and Paulapuro, H. (1998). Papermaking part 1: stock preparation and wet end. Papermaking science and technology series. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
7. Holik, H. (2006). Handbook of paper and board, 1st ed. Wiley VCH, Weinheim, Germany.10.1002/3527608257.ch1 ↗
8. Hotvedt, M., Grimstad, B., and Imsland, L. (2021). Identifiability and physical interpretability of hybrid, gray-box models – a case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54: 389–394, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.273.10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.273 ↗
9. Juhlin, P., Schlake, J., Song, C., Zehnpfund, A., Grüner, S., Schmeiser, A., Kratzer, K., Othen, R., Sejdija, J., and Kayser, P. (2025). CRADLE: cross-vendor asset digital twin architecture using industrial interoperability standards with application to paper manufacturing. In: 30th international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). IEEE.10.1109/ETFA65518.2025.11205610 ↗
10. Kins, R., Möbitz, C., and Gries, T. (2025). Towards autonomous learning and optimisation in textile production: data-driven simulation approach for optimiser validation. J. Intell. Manuf. 36: 3483–3508, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02405-3.10.1007/s10845-024-02405-3 ↗
11. Lennartsson, M., Åström, K.J., and Wittenmark, B. (2013). Modeling and control of the wet end in paper machines: a survey. Control Eng. Pract. 21: 1653–1672, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.07.009.
12. Modellfabrik Papier gGmbH (2025). Our research project FOREST, Available at: https://modellfabrikpapier.de/en/forest-en/.
13. Othen, R., Pohlmeyer, F., Song, C., Schlake, J., Sejdija, J., Schmeiser, A., Möbitz, C., and Gries, T. (2025). Sustainability management in fibre-based web production. In: Proceedings of the conference on production systems and logistics: CPSL 2025. Publish-Ing. Hannover: Publish-Ing, pp. 221–232.
14. Pantelides, C.C. and Renfro, J.G. (2013). The online use of first-principles models in process operations: review, current status and future needs. Comput. Chem. Eng. 51: 136–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.07.008.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.07.008 ↗
15. Psichogios, D.C. and Ungar, L.H. (1992). Hybrid neural network models for modeling and control of nonlinear processes. AIChE J. 38: 1499–1511, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690381003.10.1002/aic.690381003 ↗
16. Ramaswamy, S. (2003). Vacuum dewatering during paper manufacturing. Dry. Technol. 21: 685–717, https://doi.org/10.1081/drt-120019058.10.1081/DRT-120019058 ↗
17. Rudolph, M., Kurz, S., and Rakitsch, B. (2024). Hybrid modeling design patterns. J. Math. Ind. 14: 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13362-024-00141-0.10.1186/s13362-024-00141-0 ↗
18. Sharma, N. and Liu, Y.A. (2021). A hybrid science-guided machine learning approach for modeling and optimizing chemical processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01475, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01475.
19. Sjöstrand, B. (2025). Easy-to-use numerical models of water removal in vacuum dewatering and molding during through air drying of tissue paper. Dry. Technol. 43: 668–678, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2024.2449177.10.1080/07373937.2024.2449177 ↗
20. Sjöstrand, B. and Bergström, V. (2024). Monitoring solids content development in pilot-scale through air drying of tissue paper. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 39: 127–137, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2023-0092.10.1515/npprj-2023-0092 ↗
21. Sonsale, A.N., Yashpal, Pohekar, S., and Purohit, J. (2023). Drivers to energy efficiency measures in recycled paper and pulp industry in India: an interpretive structural modelling-based framework. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 55: 102961, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102961.10.1016/j.seta.2022.102961 ↗
22. Stanišić, D., Mejić, L., Jorgovanović, B., Ilić, V., and Jorgovanović, N. (2024). An algorithm for soft sensor development for a class of processes with distinct operating conditions. Sensors (Basel, Switz.) 24: 1948, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24061948.10.3390/s24061948 ↗
23. Thai, H.T. (2022). Machine learning for structural engineering: a state-of-the-art review. Structures 38: 448–491, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.007.10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 ↗
24. Valmet (2025). Total and true ash consistency for a stable wet end, Online, Available at: https://www.valmet.com/automation/analyzers-measurements/analyzers/retention-measurement/.
25. Viitala, R., Miettinen, M., Marquez, R., Hämäläinen, A., Karhinen, A., Barrios, N., Gonzalez, R., Pal, L., Jameel, H., and Holmberg, K. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence and sustainable energy management in the pulp and paper industry: a path to decarbonization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 218: 115809, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115809.10.1016/j.rser.2025.115809 ↗
26. Willard, J., Jia, X., Xu, S., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V. (2022). Integrating physics-based modeling and machine learning: a survey of methods and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 55: 1–34.10.1145/3514228 ↗
27. Zhang, H., Li, J., and Hong, M. (2021). Machine learning-based energy system model for tissue paper machines. Processes 9: 655, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040655.10.3390/pr9040655 ↗
28. Zhang, L., Ren, G., Li, S., Du, J., Xu, D., and Li, Y. (2025). A novel soft sensor approach for industrial quality prediction based TCN with spatial and temporal attention. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 257: 105272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105272.10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105272 ↗