Micro-CT analysis of creased and folded multilayer cardboard
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Micro-CT analysis of experimentally creased and folded multilayer cardboards reveals insights into how the material deformation due to the creasing and folding process of cardboard impact the material concerning delaminations and position of broke particles. Delaminations were found in various locations and varied in size from just under a tenth of a millimeter to up to four times the thickness of the cardboard. The particles varied in size, ranging from a few micrometers to slightly larger than the cardboard thickness. Characteristic dimensions for the creased and folded cardboard were measured for selected cross sections. The differences in characteristic dimensions for the cross sections among the samples were typically a few hundredths of a millimeter. There are differences between cross-sections that are a few hundredths of a millimeter apart.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Music Technology and Sound Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Science and Technology , Örebro University , SE-701 82 , Örebro , Sweden
Department of Engineering and Physics, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology , Karlstad University , SE-65188 , Karlstad , Sweden
Holmen Iggesund Paperboard AB , Stockholm , Sweden
Paper Physics & Converting, Billerud AB , Gävle , Sweden
Innovation Product and Application Development, Billerud AB , Grums , Sweden
Tetra Pak , Ruben Rausings Gata 2, 223 55 , Lund , Sweden
Funding
Knowledge foundation
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Coffin, D. and Nygårds, M. (2017). Creasing and folding, advances in pulp and paper research. In: Batchelor, W. and Söderberg, D. (Eds.).Trans. of the XVIth fund res symp. FRC, Manchester, Oxford, pp. 69–136.10.15376/frc.2017.1.69 ↗
2. du Roscoat, S.R., Bloch, J.F., and Caulet, P. (2012). A method to quantify the 3D microstructure of fibrous materials containing mineral fillers using X-ray microtomography: application to paper materials. J. Mater. Sci. 47: 6517–6521, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6575-z.10.1007/s10853-012-6575-z ↗
3. Grangård, H. (1970). Compression of board cartons. 1. Correlation between actual tests and empirical equations. Sven. Papperstidning, Nord. Cellul. 73: 462.
4. Huang, H. and Nygårds, M. (2011). Numerical and experimental investigation of paperboard folding. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 26: 452–467.10.3183/npprj-2011-26-04-p452-467 ↗
5. Huang, H., Hagman, A., and Nygårds, M. (2014). Quasi static analysis of creasing and folding for three paperboards. Mech. Mater. 69: 11–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.09.016.10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.09.016 ↗
6. Johansson, S., Engqvist, J., Tryding, J., and Hall, S.A. (2022). Microscale deformation mechanisms in paperboard during continuous tensile loading and 4D synchrotron X-ray tomography. Strain 58: e12414, https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12414.10.1111/str.12414 ↗
7. Kaeppeler, U., Huenniger, J., and Engisch, L. (2022). Evaluation of measurement methods for compression, re-swelling and material thickness through the embossing process of cardboard. Adv. Print. Media Technol. XLVIII(VIII) – Session 4B: 85–100.
8. Maire, E. and Withers, P.J. (2014). Quantitative X-ray tomography. Int. Mater. Rev. 59: 1–43, https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023.10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
9. Marin, G., Srinivasa, P., Nygårds, M., and Östlund, S. (2021). Experimental and finite element simulated box compression tests on paperboard packages at different moisture levels. Packag. Technol. Sci. 34: 229–243, https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2554.10.1002/pts.2554 ↗
10. Mark, A., Berce, A., Sandborg, R., Edelvik, F., Glatt, E., Rief, S., Wiegmann, A., Fredlund, M., Amini, J., Rentzhog, M., et al.. (2012). Multi-scale simulation of paperboard edge wicking using a fiber-resolving virtual paper model. Tappi J. 11: 9–14.10.32964/TJ11.6.9 ↗
11. Nagasawa, S., Endo, R., Fukuzawa, Y., Uchino, S., and Katayama, I. (2003). Effect of crease depth and crease deviation on folding deformation characteristics of coated paperboard. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 140: 157–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00825-2.10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00825-2 ↗
12. Niskanen, K. (2012). Mechanics of paper products. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston.
13. Nygårds, M., Just, M. and Tryding, J. (2009). Experimental and numerical studies of creasing of paperboard, Int. J. Solids Struct. 46: 11–12.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.014 ↗
14. Nygårds, M., Bhattacharya, A., and Krishnan, S.V.R. (2014). Optimizing shear strength profiles in paperboard for better crease formation. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 29: 510–520, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-520.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-520 ↗
15. Pacheco, M. and Goyal, D. (2011) Detection and characterization of defects in microelectronic packages and boards by means of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT). In: Proceedings IEEE 61st electronic components and technology conference (ECTC). Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, pp. 1263–1268.10.1109/ECTC.2011.5898673 ↗
16. Persson, C., Eriksson, H., and Korin, C. (2023). The influence of creases on carton board package behavior during point loading. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 38: 491–499, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2023-0021.10.1515/npprj-2023-0021 ↗
17. Ristinmaa, M., Ottosen, N.S., and Korin, C. (2012). Analytical prediction of package collapse loads - basic considerations. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 27: 806–813, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p806-813.10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p806-813 ↗
18. Robertsson, K., Jacobsson, E., Wallin, M., Borgqvist, E., Ristinmaa, M., and Tryding, J. (2023). A continuum damage model for creasing and folding of paperboard. Packag. Technol. Sci. 36: 1037–1050, https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2774.10.1002/pts.2774 ↗
19. Saxena, P., Bissacco, G., Stolfi, A., and Chiffre, L.D. (2017). Characterizing green fiber bottle prototypes using computed tomography. In: Proceedings of 7th Conference on industrial computed tomography. iCT2017, Leuven, Belgium.
20. Singh, S., Kumar, J., and Rao, P.V.M. (2018). Environmental impact assessment framework for product packaging. Manag. Environ. Qual. 29: 499–515, https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-10-2017-0105.10.1108/MEQ-10-2017-0105 ↗
21. Viguié, J., Dumont, P.J.J., Mauret, E., du Roscoat, S.R., Vacher, P., Desloges, I., and Bloch, J.-F. (2011). Analysis of the hygroexpansion of a lignocellulosic fibrous material by digital correlation of images obtained by X-ray synchrotron microtomography: application to a folding box board. J. Mater. Sci. 46: 4756–4769, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5386-y.10.1007/s10853-011-5386-y ↗
22. Wallmeier, M., Barbier, C., Beckmann, F., Brandberg, A., Holmqvist, C., Kulachenko, A., Moosmann, J., Östlund, S., and Pettersson, T. (2021). Phenomenological analysis of constrained in-plane compression of paperboard using micro-computed tomography Imaging. Nordic Pulp & Paper Res J 36: 491–502, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2020-0092.10.1515/npprj-2020-0092 ↗
23. Williams, H. and Wikström, F. (2011). Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items. J. Clean. Prod. 19: 43–48.10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.008 ↗