Effects on hand-sheet paper properties of pH in deinking process
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In today’s world where natural resources are rapidly decreasing, recycling printed papers, and their use in paper production will reduce the environmental pollution caused by waste paper. Thus, energy savings can be achieved with less energy consumption. Although many methods are used in the deinking of printed papers, the effectiveness of these methods varies depending on many parameters, such as the type of paper to be de-inked, the type of printed ink in the printing system, and the chemicals used in deinking. In this study, the effect of pH in the deinking process was studied. Electrophotographic printed papers were used as the printed paper in this study, and the INGEDE method was applied as the deinking method. In this method, 3 different pH environments were prepared and an ink removal process was carried out in this environment. Optical and physical properties were determined by producing hand-sheet papers from the deinked pulp. In addition, test prints were made to determine the printability of the produced hand-sheet papers in the electrophotographic printing system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Material Properties and Processing · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Paper Engineering , College of Engineering and Applied Science , Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo , MI , , United States of America
Department of Printing Technologies , School of Applied Sciences , Marmara University , Istanbul , Turkiye
Funding
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Aciu, C., Iluţiu–Varvara, D. A., Cobirzan, N., & Balog, A. (2014) Recycling of paper waste in the composition of plastering mortars, Procedia Technology, 12: 295–300.10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.489 ↗
2. Bajpai, P. Biotechnology for pulp and paper processing. Springer, New York, 2012. pp. 7–13.10.1007/978-1-4614-1409-4 ↗
3. Balda, S., Sharma, A., Capalash, N., Sharma, P. (2019) Microbial enzymes for eco-friendly recycling of waste paper by deinking. In: Microbes for Sustainable Development and Bioremediation. CRC Press. pp. 43–54.10.1201/9780429275876-2 ↗
4. Chester, M., Martin, E. (2009). Cellulosic ethanol from municipal solid waste: a case study of the economic, energy, and greenhouse gas impacts in California.10.1021/es802788z ↗
5. Cruz, M., Joyce, M. K., Fleming, P. D., Rosenberger, R. (2007). Comparative study: Verity IA topography, Emveco, and Parker Print Surf, Proceedings of the TAPPI Papermakers & PIMA International Leadership Conference, Jacksonville, March 11–15.
6. de Alda, J. A. O. (2008) Feasibility of recycling pulp and paper mill sludge in the paper and board industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52(7):965–972.10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.02.005 ↗
7. Du, X. T., Lee, D. T., Hsieh, J. S. (2016) Inkjet ink behaviors and its implication in adsorption deinking. Separation Science and Technology 51(18):2857–2867.10.1080/01496395.2016.1226902 ↗
8. Elmas, G. M., Sonmez, S. (2011) Printability properties of some alkaline sulfite-anthraquinone-methanol handsheets. Asian Journal of Chemistry 23(6):2515–2519.
9. Engstrand, P., Johansson, B. (2005). 15 Paper Recycling. Pulping Chemistry and Technology. p. 391.
10. Faul, A. M. (2010) Quality requirements in graphic paper recycling. Cellulose Chemistry & Technology 44(10): 451.
11. Husovska, V., Pekarovic, J., Pekarovicova, A., Fleming, P.D. (2015). Soybean oil for enhanced deinking of litho prints. J. Print Media Tech. Res. 4(4), 279–284.
12. Imamoglu, S. (2006) Deinkability efficiency of waste office paper printed using a duplicating machine. Journal of Applied Sciences 6(9):2006–2009. ISSN 1812-5654.10.3923/jas.2006.2006.2009 ↗
13. Jiang, C., Ma, J. (2000). Deinking of waste paper: flotation. Enzymatic Deinking Technologies, 1–2.10.1016/B0-12-226770-2/05881-6 ↗
14. Kong, L., Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L. (2016) Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and paper industry: a technical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 122:5–28.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.116 ↗
15. Lopes, E., Dias, A., Arroja, L., Capela, I., Pereira, F. (2003) Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry. Journal of cleaner production 11(1):51–59.10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00005-7 ↗
16. Monte, M.C., Fuente, E., Blanco, A., Negro, C. (2009) Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste management 29(1):293–308.10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.002 ↗
17. Pal, L., Joyce, M.K., Fleming, P.D. (2006) A simple method for calculation of permeability coefficient of porous media. TAPPI J. 5(9):10–16.
18. Petzold, G., Schwarz, S. (2015) Investigation of an improved deinking process of waste paper–The influence of surface tension and charge in suspension on ink removal. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 480:398–404.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.01.084 ↗
19. Sardjeva, R., Koeva, E. (2015). Digital printing technologies and possibilities for recycling of printed papers:(a comprehensive overview). International Circular of Graphic Education and Research, (8).
20. Saxena, A., Singh Chauhan, P. (2017) Role of various enzymes for deinking paper: a review. Critical reviews in biotechnology 37(5):598–612.10.1080/07388551.2016.1207594 ↗
21. Searle, S., Malins, C. (2013). Availability of Cellulosic Residues and Wastes in the EU. International Council on Clean Transportation: Washington, DC, USA.
22. Shen, L., Worrell, E., Patel, M.K. (2010) Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibres. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55(2):260–274.10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.001 ↗
23. Sonmez, S. (2020). Gloss of paper. In: Current Researches in Engineering Sciences. p. 77.
24. Thompson, R.C. (1999). The effect of evolving ink chemistry on the reclamation of paper fibre. Pigment & resin technology.10.1108/03699429910252324 ↗
25. Tsatsis, D.E., Papachristos, D.K., Valta, K.A., Vlyssides, A.G., Economides, D.G. (2017) Enzymatic deinking for recycling of office waste paper. Journal of environmental chemical engineering 5(2):1744–1753.10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.007 ↗
26. URL1 (2022). Laser printer process https://impressivemagazine.com/about-laser-printers/ (Accessed date: 03/8/2022).
27. URL2 (2022). Flotation process http://www.china-ftm.com/pros/flotation_machine.html (Accessed date: 03/8/2022).
28. Wang, Z.M., Wagner, J., Wall, S. (2011) Characterization of laser printer nanoparticle and VOC emissions, formation mechanisms, and strategies to reduce airborne exposures. Aerosol Science and Technology 45(9):1060–1068.10.1080/02786826.2011.580799 ↗
29. Yilmaz, U., Tutuş, A., Sonmez, S. (2021a) Investigation of recycling repetition effect on deinkability efficiency and printing properties. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 1–15.10.1080/01694243.2021.1966256 ↗
30. Yilmaz, U., Tutus, A., Sonmez, S. (2021b) Fiber classification, physical and optical properties of recycled paper. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 55:689–696.10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.58 ↗