Model to predict the top-to-bottom compressive strength of folding cartons
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a proposed mathematical model, describing the calculations involved in deducting the critical compression force for rectangular, parallelepiped paperboard packaging, and permitting the minimisation of the thickness of the package sidewall. A comparison is given between the obtained calculations regarding critical force and the experimentally-determined results. This has shown a sufficient level of accuracy both for the theoretical and the experimental results. This means that the proposed mathematical engineering calculations model can be applied to the design of rectangular, parallelepiped paperboard packaging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Production Engineering , 49566 Warsaw University of Technology , ul. Konwiktorska 2 , Warsaw , Poland
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design , 70309 Kaunas University of Technology , Studentų 56 , Kaunas , Lithuania
Funding
European Social Fund
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Baum, G.A., Bornhoeft, L.R. (1979) Estimating Poisson ratios in paper using ultrasonic techniques. Tappi J. 62:87–90.
2. Beldie, L., Sandberg, G., Sandberg, L. (2001) Paperboard packages exposed to static loads – finite element modelling and experiments. Packag. Technol. Sci. 14(4):171–178.10.1002/pts.546 ↗
3. Borgqvist, E., Wallin, M., Ristinmaa, M., Tryding, J. (2015) An anisotropic in-plane and out-of-plane elasto-plastic continuum model for paperboard. Compos. Struct. 126:184–195.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.067 ↗
4. Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. Off. J. Eur. Union. L 47. Brussels, 18.2.2004:26–31.
5. Evaluation of costs and benefits for the achievement of reuse and recycling targets for the different packaging materials in the frame of the packaging and packaging waste directive 94/62/EC: Final Consolidated Report. RDC, PIRA, March 2003.- 131 p. Annexes 1–13, 211 p.+ 59 pages of tables and diagrams.
6. Frank, B. (2014) Corrugated box compression – A literature survey. Packag. Technol. Sci. 27(2):105–128.10.1002/pts.2019 ↗
7. Garbowski, T., Borysiewicz, A. (2014) The stability of corrugated board packages. Prz. Pap. 70(8):452–458.
8. Garbowski, T., Jarmuszczak, M. (2014) Numerical strength estimate of corrugated board packages. Part 2. Experimental tests and numerical analysis of paperboard packages. Prz. Pap. 70(5):277–281.
9. Garbowski, T., Przybyszewski, G. (2015) The sensitivity analysis of critical force in box compression test. Prz. Pap. 71(5):275–280.
10. Głowacki, K. (2017) Influence of corrugated boxes weight on their compression strength (BCT). Prz. Pap. 73(6):423–426.
11. Göttsching, L., Baumgarten, H.L. (1976) Triaxial deformation of paper under tensile load. In: The Fundamental Properties of Paper Related to Its Uses, Vol 1. Technical Division of the British Paper and Board Industry Federation. pp. 227–252.
12. Grangård, H., Kubát, J. (1969) Some aspects of the compressive strength of cartons. Sven. Papp.tidn. 72(15):466–473.
13. Hahn, E.K., de Ruvo, A., Westerlind, B.S., Carlsson, L.A. (1992) Compressive strength of edge-loaded corrugated board panels. Exp. Mech. 32(3):259–265.10.1007/BF02319364 ↗
14. Kellicutt, K.Q., Landt, E.F. (1958) Basic Design Data for the Use of Fiberboard in Shipping Containers. USDA For. Serv. Rep. No. 1911. For. Prod. Lab., Madison, Wis.
15. Kibirkštis, E., Lebedys, A., Kabelkaitė, A., Havenko, S. (2007) Experimental study of paperboard package resistance to compression. Mechanika 63:27–33.
16. Kołakowski, Z. (2003) A little about some other views on the BCT. Prz. Pap. 59(10):605–606.
17. Kolakowski, Z., Mania, R. (2007) Closed method of lower bound estimation of the BCT index. Opakowanie 52(7):49–52.
18. Łęcka, M., Mania, R., Marynowski, K. (2006) New method of the compressive strength of corrugated board determination. Prz. Pap. 62(4):150–153.
19. Linvill, E. (2015) Box compression strength: A crippling approach. Packag. Technol. Sci. 28(4):1027–1037.10.1002/pts.2181 ↗
20. Linvill, E., Östlund, S. (2014) The combined effects of moisture and temperature on the mechanical response of paper. Exp. Mech. 64:1329–1341.10.1007/s11340-014-9898-7 ↗
21. Mark, R.E., Habeger, C.C., Boch, J., Lyne, M.B. Handbook of Physical Testing of Paper – Volume 1. Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. New York & Basel, 2002.10.1201/9781482290103 ↗
22. McKee, R.C., Gander, J.W., Wachuta, J.R. (1963) Compression strength formula for corrugated board. Paperboard Packag. 48:149–159.
23. Pilkey, W.D. Formulas for Stress, Strain and Structural Matrices. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005.10.1002/9780470172681 ↗
24. Pyryev, Y., Kibirkštis, E., Miliūnas, V., Sidaravičius, J. (2016) Engineering calculation procedure of critical compressive force of paperboard packages. Prz. Pap. 72(6):374–381.
25. Ristinmaa, M., Ottosen, N.S., Korin, C. (2012) Analytical prediction of package collapse loads – Basic considerations. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 27(4):806–813.10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p806-813 ↗
26. Szewczyk, W. (2005) Analyses on the increase of the BCT of corrugated packaging. Prz. Pap. 61(8):435–438.
27. Szewczyk, W., Marynowski, K. (2007) New method of the BCT index of corrugated board determination. Opakowanie 52(7):44–48.
28. Timoshenko, S.P., Gere, J.M. Theory of Elastic Stability. Second Ed. McGraw-Hill, 1961.
29. Urbanik, T.J., Frank, B. (2006) Box compression analysis of worldwide data spanning 46 years. Wood Fiber Sci. 38(3):399–416.
30. Viguié, J., Dumont, P.J., Desloges, I., Mauret, E. (2010) Some experimental aspects of the compression behaviour of boxes made up of G-flute corrugated boards. Packag. Technol. Sci. 23(2):69–89.10.1002/pts.880 ↗