journal article·2012-11-01

PRINTING.Paper and printer effects on xerographic print quality

Siying Chen, Ramin Farnood, Ning Yan, Sabina Di Risio, Jay Song

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the impact of paper and printer type on the quality of xerographic prints. Ten different uncoated paper substrates were printed using three different commercial xerographic printers. The print quality of the samples (print microgloss, print microgloss nonuniformity, print density, print and gloss mottle, and visual ranking) and the physical and surface characteristics of the papers were measured. It was found that relationship between print mottle and print gloss nonuniformity was dominated by the printer type. While for some printers, these two parameters were positively correlated, in other cases printer appeared to "mask" variations in the paper properties. Multivariate analysis also showed that brightness, opacity, basis weight, 7 5 ° Tappi gloss, and roughness were the top five paper properties that had the most significant effect on the visual ranking and print mottle. Finally, as expected, print roughness was found to be a better predictor of the perceived print quality, however, paper roughness was poorly correlated with the visual ranking of printed samples (R2 0.5).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Color Science and Applications · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, 200 College Street, Toronto , ON M5S3E5, Canada

Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto , 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto , Ontario, M5 S 3B3 , Canada

L'OREAL USA, 133 Terminal Avenue, Clark , NJ 07066, USA

References

Reference metadata was not supplied for this record.