Monitoring solids content development in pilot-scale through air drying of tissue paper
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study delves into the dynamic evolution of solids content in a pilot-scale through air drying tissue machine, aiming to enhance comprehension and refine optimization strategies for tissue manufacturing. It focuses on development of solids content throughout the process. Analyzing the interaction between process parameters and solids content provides deeper insights into water removal dynamics. The research employs solid contents monitoring techniques in pilot scale, offering a detailed view of solids content evolution from the wet web’s inception to the final tissue product. It significantly highlights the impact of key parameters, particularly pulp refining, on solids content across all positions of the pilot machine. Additionally, the study emphasizes the influence of vacuum system configurations, identifying the relationship between energy expended in the vacuum system and evaporation energy. Furthermore, the results indicate that compression and air displacement dewatering in vacuum boxes are less speed-sensitive compared to heat-driven evaporation in the TAD- and Yankee cylinders. Solid contents at all positions in the tissue machine correlates between various dewatering elements. Optimizing site-specific dewatering and evaporation strategies can potentially save drying energy in the Yankee drying phase which hold promise for enhanced energy and resource utilization, aligning with demands for sustainable manufacturing practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Pro2BE, the Research Environment for Processes and Products for a Circular Forest-based Bioeconomy, Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences , Karlstad University , Karlstad , Sweden
Concept Manager DCT Technology, Valmet AB , Karlstad , Sweden
Funding
Stiftelsen för Kunskaps-och Kompetensutveckling
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Åslund, P. and Vomhoff, H. (2008). Dewatering mechanisms and their influence on suction box dewatering processes – a literature review. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 23: 389–397, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p389-397.10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p389-397 ↗
2. Åslund, P., Vomhoff, H., and Waljanson, A. (2008). External rewetting after suction box dewatering. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 23: 409–414, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p409-414.10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p409-414 ↗
3. Attwood, B.W. (1962). A study of vacuum box operation. Pap. Tech. 3: 144–153.
4. Britt, K.W. and Unbehend, J.E. (1985). Water removal during paper formation. TAPPI J. 68: 104–107.
5. de Assis, T., Reisinger, L.W., Pal, L., Pawlak, J., Jameel, H., and Gonzalez, R.W. (2018). Understanding the effect of machine technology and cellulosic fibers on tissue properties – a review. Bioresources 13: 4593–4629, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.2.Deassis.10.15376/biores.13.2.DeAssis ↗
6. Håkansson, C. (2010) Energy savings by process optimization. Reducing vacuum demand in the paper machine. In: Proceedings of TAPPI PaperCon 2010. Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1164–1191.
7. Holmberg, K., Siilasto, R., Laitinen, T., Andersson, P., and Jäsberg, A. (2013). Global energy consumption due to friction in paper machines. Tribol. Int. 62: 58–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2013.02.003.10.1016/j.triboint.2013.02.003 ↗
8. Hubbe, M.A., Sjöstrand, B., Nilsson, N., Koponen, A., and McDonald, J.D. (2020). Rate-limiting mechanisms of water removal during the formation, vacuum dewatering, and wet-pressing of paper webs: a review. Bioresources 15: 9672–9755, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.Hubbe.10.15376/biores.15.4.Hubbe ↗
9. Kullander, J., Nilsson, L., and Barbier, C. (2012). Evaluation of furnishes for tissue manufacturing: suction box dewatering and paper testing. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 27: 143–150, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2012-27-01-p143-150.10.3183/npprj-2012-27-01-p143-150 ↗
10. Lahtinen, J. and Karvinen, J. (2010) Energy savings in paper machine vacuum system. How to utilize modern process and variable speed drive technology. In: Proceedings of TAPPI PaperCon 2010. Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1129–1163.
11. Neun, J.A. (1994). Performance of high vacuum dewatering elements in the forming section. TAPPI J. 77: 133–138.
12. Nilsson, L. (2014a). Stepwise development of a mathematical model for air flow in vacuum dewatering of paper. Dry. Technol. 32: 1587–1597, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.909844.10.1080/07373937.2014.909844 ↗
13. Nilsson, L. (2014b). Air flow and compression work in vacuum dewatering of paper. Dry. Technol. 32: 39–46, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.809732.10.1080/07373937.2013.809732 ↗
14. Paulapuro, H. (2000) Wet pressing. In: Paulapuro, H., and Gullichsen, J. (Eds.). Papermaking Part 1: Stock preparation and wet end. Fapet Oy, Jyväskylä, pp. 284–340.
15. Pujara, J., Siddiqui, M.A., Liu, Z., Bjegovic, P., Takagaki, S.S., Li, P.Y., and Ramaswamy, S. (2008). Method to characterize the air flow and water removal characteristics during vacuum dewatering. Part II – Analysis and characterization. Dry. Technol. 26: 341–348, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930801898125.10.1080/07373930801898125 ↗
16. Räisänen, K.O., Karrila, S., and Maijala, A. (1996). Vacuum dewatering optimization with different furnishes. Pap. Ja Puu 78: 461–467.
17. Ramaswamy, S. (2003). Vacuum dewatering during paper manufacturing. Dry. Technol. 21: 685–717, https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-120019058.10.1081/DRT-120019058 ↗
18. Sjöstrand, B., Tremblay, B., and Danielsson, M. (2023b). Enhancing through air drying process efficiency: Investigating laboratory-to-pilot scale correspondence and impact of process variables on tissue paper manufacturing. Bioresources 18: 8264–8283, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.4.8264-8283.10.15376/biores.18.4.8264-8283 ↗
19. Sjöstrand, B., Barbier, C., and Nilsson, L. (2015). Rewetting after high vacuum suction boxes in a pilot paper machine. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30: 667–672, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p667-672.10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p667-672 ↗
20. Sjöstrand, B., Barbier, C., Ullsten, H., and Nilsson, L. (2019). Dewatering of softwood kraft pulp with additives of microfibrillated cellulose and dialcohol cellulose. Bioresources 14: 6370–6383, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.3.6370-6383.10.15376/biores.14.3.6370-6383 ↗
21. Sjöstrand, B., Danielsson, M., and Lestelius, M. (2023a). Method for studying water removal and air penetration during through air drying of tissue in laboratory scale. Bioresources 18: 3073–3088, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.2.3073-3088.10.15376/biores.18.2.3073-3088 ↗
22. Stenström, S. and Nilsson, L. (2015). Predicting water removal during vacuum dewatering from fundamental fibre property data. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30: 265–271, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p265-271.10.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p265-271 ↗
23. Tysén, A. (2018). Through air drying: thermographic studies of drying rates, drying non-uniformity and infrared assisted drying. Dissertation, Karlstad University.
24. Tysén, A., Vomhoff, H., and Nilsson, L. (2015). The influence of grammage and pulp type on through air drying. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30: 651–659, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p651-659.10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p651-659 ↗
25. Tysén, A., Vomhoff, H., and Nilsson, L. (2018). Through air drying assisted by infrared radiation: the influence of radiator power on drying rates and temperature. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 33: 581–591, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-2002.10.1515/npprj-2018-2002 ↗
26. Vieira, J.C., Fiadeiro, P.T., and Costa, A.P. (2023). Converting operations impact on tissue paper product properties – a review. Bioresources 18: 2303–2326, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.1.Vieira.10.15376/biores.18.1.Vieira ↗