On the modeling of tensile index from larger data sets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study is to analyze and foresee potential outliers in pulp and handsheet properties for larger data sets. The method is divided into two parts comprising a generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (ESD) procedure for laboratory data followed by an analysis of the findings using a multivariable model based on internal variables (i. e. process variables like consistency and fiber residence time inside the refiner) as predictors. The process data used in this has been obtained from CD-82 refiners and from a laboratory test program perspective, the test series were extensive. In the procedure more than 290 samples were analyzed to get a stable outlier detection. Note, this set was obtained from pulp at one specific operating condition. When comparing such “secured data sets” with process data it is shown that an extended procedure must be performed to get data sets which cover different operating points. Here 100 pulp samples at different process conditions were analyzed. It is shown that only about 60 percent of all tensile index measurements were accepted in the procedure which indicates the need to oversample when performing extensive trials to get reliable pulp and handsheet properties in TMP and CTMP processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrical Engineering , Chalmers University of Technology , Göteborg , Sweden
Rise PFI , Trondheim , Norway
QualTech , Tyringe , Sweden
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Barnett, V., Lewis, T. Outliers in Statistical Data. Wiley, Chichester, 1994.
2. Draper, N.R., Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. Wiley, New York, 1998.10.1002/9781118625590 ↗
3. EPA. (2006) Data Quality Assessment: Statistical Methods for Practitioners EPA QA/G-9S, EPA/240/B-06/003, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Washington DC.
4. Forgacs, O.L. (1963) The characterization of mechanical pulps. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 89–118.
5. Freedman, L.S., Pee, D. (1989) Return to a note on screening regression equations. Am. Stat. 43:279–282.10.1080/00031305.1989.10475675 ↗
6. Gilbert, R.O. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987.
7. Harrell, F., Lee, K.l., Matchar, D.B., Reicert, T.A. (1985) Regression models for prognostic prediction: Advantages, problems and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat. Rep. 68:1071–1077.
8. Härkönen, E., Huusari, E., Ravila, P. (2000) Residence time of fibre in a single disc refiner. Pulp Pap. Can. T:330–335.
9. Härkönen, E., Kortelainen, J., Virtanen, J., Vuorio, P. (2003) Fiber development in TMP main line. In: International Mechanical Pulping conference, Quebec, Que, Canada, 2–5 June 2003. pp. 171–178.
10. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014a) Fiber energy efficiency Part I: Extended entropy model. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29(2).10.3183/npprj-2014-29-02-p322-331 ↗
11. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014b) Fiber energy efficiency Part II: Forces acting on the refiner bars. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29(2).10.3183/npprj-2014-29-02-p332-343 ↗
12. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014c) Refining energy efficiency Part III: Modeling of fiber-to-bar interaction. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29(3).10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p401-408 ↗
13. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014d) Refining energy efficiency Part IV: Multi-scale modeling of refining processes. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29(3).10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p409-417 ↗
14. Karlström, A., Hill, J. (2017a) CTMP process optimization Part I: Internal and external variables impact on refiner conditions. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32(1).10.3183/npprj-2017-32-01-p035-044 ↗
15. Karlström, A., Hill, J. (2017b) CTMP process optimization Part II: Reliability in pulp and handsheet measurements. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32(2).10.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p253-265 ↗
16. Karlström, A., Hill, J. (2017c) CTMP process optimization Part III: On the prediction of Scott-Bond, Z-strength and tensile index. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32(2).10.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p266-279 ↗
17. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Ferritsius, R., Ferritsius, O. (2015) Pulp property development Part I: Interlacing undersampled pulp properties and TMP process data using piece-wise linear functions. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30(4).10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p599-608 ↗
18. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Ferritsius, R., Ferritsius, O. (2016a) Pulp property development Part II: Process nonlinearities and its influence on pulp property development. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 31(2).10.3183/npprj-2016-31-02-p287-299 ↗
19. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Ferritsius, R., Ferritsius, O. (2016b) Pulp property development Part III: Fiber residence time and consistency profile impact on specific energy and pulp properties. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 31(2).10.3183/npprj-2016-31-02-p300-307 ↗
20. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Johansson, L. (2018) An overview of some efforts to understand CD-refiners. In: International Mechanical Pulping Conference, Trondheim.
21. Lowe, G.K., Zohdy, M.A. (2010) Modeling nonlinear systems using multiple piecewise linear equations. Nonlinear Anal.: Model. Control 15(4):451–458.10.15388/NA.15.4.14317 ↗
22. Nelsson, E. (2016) Improved energy efficiency in mill scale production of mechanical pulp by increasing wood softening and refining intensity, ISSN: 1652-893X, ISBN: 978-91-88025-59-3, PhD thesis, Mid Sweden University.
23. Peduzzi, P., Cocato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T.R., Feinstein, A.R. (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49(12):1373–1379.10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 ↗
24. Rosner, B. (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25:165–172.10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848 ↗
25. Sabourin, M., Wiseman, N., Vaughn, J. (2001) Refining theory considerations for assessing pulp properties in the commercial manufacture of TMP. In: 55th Appita Annual Conference. pp. 195–204.
26. Stephens, M.A. (1974) EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69(347):730–737.10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196 ↗
27. Strand, B.C. (1996) Model based control of high consistency refining. Tappi J. 79(10):140–146.
28. Strand, B.C., Grace, B. (2014) Implementation of advanced supervisory control within a TMP refiner quality control system. In: International Mechanical Pulping Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
29. Vittinghoff, E., McCulloch, C.E. (2007) Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am. J. Epidemiol. 165:(6).10.1093/aje/kwk052 ↗