Alkali-extracted spruce bark residues for pulping and making of pulp sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Spruce bark residues obtained after alkaline extraction of polyphenols were studied as raw material for pulping and making of pulp sheets. Kraft pulping of mixtures containing wood chips and 5 % or 20 % wt. bark residues produced unbleached pulps with higher screened yields and lower kappa number than wood pulps. During bleaching, the evolution of brightness along with kappa reduction followed a similar trend in all pulps, and bleached mixed pulps with ISO brightness >89 % could be obtained with somewhat lower intrinsic viscosity than wood pulps. The high content of calcium and other metal elements in spruce bark, which was partially reduced by the alkaline extraction, did not seem to impair the pulping and bleaching of the pulps. Sheets made from mixed pulps had rather similar optical and mechanical properties than sheets from wood pulps, and interestingly, sheets produced from mixed pulps with 20 % bark residues showed higher bulk as a function of internal bond strength, which may be exploited in packaging boards. Pulping of bark residues to produce mixed pulps would thus maximize the utilization of spruce bark streams after extracting the polyphenols, while increasing the pulp output in the mills.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Phytochemical compounds biological activities · Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd , P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT , Espoo , Finland
Funding
Business Finland
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Batchelor, W.J., Kure, K.A., and Ouellet, D. (1999). Refining and the development of fibre properties. Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 14: 285–291, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1999-14-04-p285-291.10.3183/npprj-1999-14-04-p285-291 ↗
2. Bianchi, S., Kroslakova, I., Janzon, R., Mayer, I., Saake, B., and Pichelin, F. (2015). Characterization of condensed tannins and carbohydrates in hot water bark extracts of European softwood species. Phytochemistry 120: 53–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.10.006.10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.10.006 ↗
3. Borrega, M., Kalliola, A., Määttänen, M., Borisova, A.S., Mikkelson, A., and Tamminen, T. (2022). Alkaline extraction of polyphenols for valorization of industrial spruce bark. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 19: 101129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101129.10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101129 ↗
4. FAOSTAT (2023). Forestry production and trade, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (Accessed 23 Jan 2025).
5. Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., Berryman, A.A., and Christiansen, E. (1998). Specialized phloem parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Pinaceae) bark are an important site of defense reactions. Am. J. Bot. 85: 601–615, https://doi.org/10.2307/2446529.10.2307/2446529 ↗
6. Gharehkhani, S., Sadeghinezhad, E., Kazi, S.N., Yarmand, H., Badarudin, A., Safaei, M.R., and Zubir, M.N.M. (2015). Basic effects of pulp refining on fiber properties – a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 115: 785–803, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047 ↗
7. Harder, M.L., Einspahr, D.W., and Parham, R.A. (1978). Bark fibrous yield for 42 pulpwood species. Tappi 61: 121–122.
8. Hu, L., Koppolu, R., Hämäläinen, R., Kanerva, H., Nick, T., Toivakka, M., Korpinen, R., Saranpää, P., Qasim, U., Liimatainen, H., et al.. (2024). Suberin-based aqueous dispersions for barrier packaging applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12: 8902–8912.10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c02244 ↗
9. Iakovlev, M., You, X., van Heiningen, A., and Sixta, H. (2014). SO 2 –ethanol–water (SEW) fractionation of spruce: kinetics and conditions for paper and viscose-grade dissolving pulps. RSC Adv. 4: 1938–1950, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra45573d.10.1039/C3RA45573D ↗
10. Joutsimo, O., Wathén, R., and Tamminen, T. (2005). Effects of fiber deformations on pulp sheet properties and fiber strength. Pap. Ja Puu 87: 392–397.
11. Karlemo, C. (2019). Non-process elements in the recovery cycle of six Finnish kraft pulp mills. Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland. Correction Statement: Correction (Turku, Finland) added on August 22, 2025 after online publication August 15, 2025.
12. Kemppainen, K., Siika-aho, M., Pattathil, S., Giovando, S., and Kruus, K. (2014). Spruce bark as an industrial source of condensed tannins and non-cellulosic sugars. Ind. Crops Prod. 52: 158–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.10.009.10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.10.009 ↗
13. Krasutsky, P.A. (2006). Birch bark research and development. Nat. Prod. Rep. 23: 919–942, https://doi.org/10.1039/b606816b.10.1039/b606816b ↗
14. Kwan, I., Huang, T., Ek, M., Seppänen, R., and Skagerlind, P. (2022). Bark from nordic tree species – a sustainable source for amphiphilic polymers and surfactants. Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 37: 566–575, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2022-0003.10.1515/npprj-2022-0003 ↗
15. Lawoko, M., Henriksson, G., and Gellerstedt, G. (2005). Structural differences between the lignin-carbohydrate complexes present in wood and in chemical pulps. Biomacromolecules 6: 3467–3473, https://doi.org/10.1021/bm058014q.10.1021/bm058014q ↗
16. Mandlez, D., Koller, S., Eckhart, R., Kulachenko, A., Bauer, W., and Hirn, U. (2022). Quantifying the contribution of fines production during refining to the resulting paper strength. Cellulose 29: 8811–8826, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04809-x.10.1007/s10570-022-04809-x ↗
17. Miranda, I., Gominho, J., and Pereira, H. (2012). Incorporation of bark and tops in Eucalyptus globulus wood pulping. Bioresources 7: 4350–4361, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.3.4350-4361.10.15376/biores.7.3.4350-4361 ↗
18. Neiva, D.M., Gominho, J., Fernandes, L., Lourenço, A., Chemetova, C., Simões, R.M.S., and Pereira, H. (2016). The potential of hydrothermally pretreated industrial barks from E. globulus as a feedstock for pulp production. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 36: 383–392, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2016.1184280.10.1080/02773813.2016.1184280 ↗
19. Pizzi, A. (2019). Tannins: prospectives and actual industrial applications. Biomolecules 9: 344, https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9080344.10.3390/biom9080344 ↗
20. Rothpfeffer, C. and Karltun, E. (2007). Inorganic elements in tree compartments of Picea abies-concentrations versus stem diameter in wood and bark and concentrations in needles and branches. Biomass Bioenergy 31: 717–725, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.017.10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.017 ↗
21. Saarela, K.-E., Harju, L., Lill, J.-O., Heselius, S.-J., Rajander, J., and Lindroos, A. (2005). Quantitative elemental analysis of dry-ashed bark and wood samples of birch, spruce and pine from South-Western Finland using PIXE. Acta Acad. Aboensis – Ser. B 65: 1–27.
22. Singhal, A., Goel, A., Bhatnagar, A., Roslander, C., Wallberg, O., Konttinen, J., and Joronen, T. (2023). Improving inorganic composition and ash fusion behavior of spruce bark by leaching with water, acetic acid, and steam pre-treatment condensate. Chem. Eng. J. 452: 139351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139351.10.1016/j.cej.2022.139351 ↗
23. Sirviö, J. and Nurminen, I. (2004). Systematic changes in paper properties. Pulp Pap. Can. 105: 39–42.
24. Supriyadi, D., Damayanti, D., Veigel, S., Hansmann, C., and Gindl-Altmutter, W. (2025). Unlocking the potential of tree bark: review of approaches from extractives to materials for higher-added value products. Mater. Today Sustain. 29: 101074, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101074.10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101074 ↗
25. Thorenz, A., Wietschel, L., Stindt, D., and Tuma, A. (2018). Assessment of agroforestry residue potentials for the bioeconomy in the European Union. J. Clean. Prod. 176: 348–359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.143.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.143 ↗
26. Tripathi, S.K., Alam, I., and Bhardwaj, N.K. (2020). Effect of bark content in mixed hardwood chips on pulp and papermaking properties. Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 35: 325–331, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2020-0017.10.1515/npprj-2020-0017 ↗
27. Ulmgren, P. (1997). Non-process elements in a bleached kraft pulp mill with a high degree of system closure – state of the art. Nord. Pulp Pap Res. J. 12: 32–40, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1997-12-01-p032-041.10.3183/npprj-1997-12-01-p032-041 ↗
28. Vroom, K.E. (1957). The H factor: a means of expressing cooking times and temperatures as a single variable. Pulp Pap Res. Inst. Can. 38: 228–231.
29. Wang, F., Morsali, M., Rizikovs, J., Pylypchuk, I., Mathew, A.P., and Sipponen, M.H. (2024). Fully bio-based water-resistant wood coatings derived from tree bark. Mater. Horiz. 11: 6504–6515, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4mh01010h.10.1039/D4MH01010H ↗
30. Wang, L., Moilanen, A., Lehtinen, J., Konttinen, J., and Matas, B.G. (2017). Release of potassium during devolatilization of spruce bark. Energy Proc. 105: 1295–1301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.463.10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.463 ↗