journal article·2025-03-26Open access

Characterising the mechanical behaviour of dry-formed cellulose fibre materials

Magdalena Kaplan, Adam Johansson, Sören Östlund

Abstract

Abstract In the dry-forming process, paper pulp is formed without adding water, making it more resource-effective than traditional papermaking. It is a relatively new technology, patented only in recent years, and very few material investigations exist in the literature; hence, little is known of the constitutive behaviour. The stress state during forming is highly complex, including multiaxial loading, extreme densification, friction, large strains, and fibre-joint formation. This paper studies dry-formed materials at different compression levels, from the sparse mat to the highly densified network. Three primary loading modes are investigated: in-plane tension, out-of-plane shear and out-of-plane compression. The results indicate that the tensile modulus and strength scale quadratically and cubically to the density, respectively, while the shear properties start developing after the density passes a threshold value. The compressive properties proved difficult to quantify, mainly because of the discrepancy between the density before and after the compressive test. The dry-formed material was compared to wet-formed paper materials in the literature. This showed that the in-plane (tensile) properties and the out-of-plane shear strength are visibly lower while the shear stiffness is similar, compared to wet-formed materials. Nonetheless, the findings set a starting point for numerical simulations of the dry-forming process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Material and Structural Mechanics, Department of Engineering Mechanics , 7655 KTH Royal Institute of Technology , 100 44 Stockholm , Sweden

Yangi AB , Honungsgatan 4b, 432 48 , Varberg , Sweden

Funding

Strategic Innovation Programme BioInnovation with support from Vinnova, Swedish Energy Agency, and FORMAS

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Askling, C., Wågberg, L., and Rigdahl, M. (1998). The effect of additives on the mechanical properties of dry-formed fibre networks. J. Mater. Sci. 33: 1997–2003, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004390313084.10.1023/A:1004390313084 ↗
2. Asta, N., Kaplan, M., Kulachenko, A., Östlund, S., and Wågberg, L. (2024). Influence of density and chemical additives on paper mechanical properties. Cellulose 31: 5809–5822, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05917-6.10.1007/s10570-024-05917-6 ↗
3. Barzyk, D., Page, D.H., and Ragauskas, A. (1997) Carboxylic acid groups and fibre bonding. In: Baker, C.F. (Ed.). Trans. of the XIth fund. Res. Symp. Cambridge, 1997. Fundamental Research Committee (FRC), Manchester, pp. 893–907.10.15376/frc.1997.2.893 ↗
4. Browning, B.L. (1969). The nature of paper. In: Proceedings of the thirty-fourth annual conference of the graduate library school. The University of Chicago Press, pp. 18–38.10.1086/619812 ↗
5. Byrd, V.L. (1974). How much moisture is needed to develop strength in dry-formed handsheets? Tappi J. 57: 131–133.
6. Byrd, V.L. (1982). Bonding of-air laid webs Critical amount of moisture necessary. Tappi J. 65: 153–155.
7. Campbell, W.B. (1934). Hydration and beating of cellulose pulps. UTC, Montreal.10.1021/ie50290a021 ↗
8. Chinga-Carrasco, G., Ruwoldt, J., Pasquier, E., Dalheim, M.Ø., and Wieser, M.K. (2024). Development of a beverage carton closure cap based on 100% wood pulp fibres. J. Clean. Prod. 445: 141339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141339.10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141339 ↗
9. Delgado-Fornué, E., Contreras, H.J., Toriz, G., and Allan, G.G. (2011). Adhesion between cellulosic fibers in paper. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 25: 597–614, https://doi.org/10.1163/016942410X530951.10.1163/016942410X530951 ↗
10. Deogekar, S. and Picu, R.C. (2018). On the strength of random fiber networks. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 116: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.026.10.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.026 ↗
11. Deogekar, S., Islam, M.R., and Picu, R.C. (2019). Parameters controlling the strength of stochastic fibrous materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 168: 194–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.03.033.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.03.033 ↗
12. Didone, M., Mohanty, S., Hattel, J.H., Sonne, M.R., Fiordaliso, E.M., Checchi, A., and Tosello, G. (2020). On the drying process of molded pulp products: experiments and numerical modelling. Dry Technol. 38: 1644–1662, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1653905.10.1080/07373937.2019.1653905 ↗
13. Freville, E., Pescheux-Sergienko, J., Mujica, R., Rey, C., and Bras, J. (2024). Novel technologies for producing tridimensional cellulosic materials for packaging: a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 342: 122413, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122413.10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122413 ↗
14. Hagman, A. and Nygårds, M. (2012). Investigation of sample-size effects on in-plane tensile testing of paperboard. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 27: 295–304, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2012-27-02-p295-304.10.3183/npprj-2012-27-02-p295-304 ↗
15. Hagman, A. and Rydefalk, C. (2024). Z-directional testing of paperboard in combined tensile and compression loading. Tappi J. 23: 268–284, https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ23.5.268.10.32964/TJ23.5.268 ↗
16. Hauptmann, M., Wallmeier, M., Erhard, K., Zelm, R., and Majschak, J.-P. (2015). The role of material composition, fiber properties and deformation mechanisms in the deep drawing of paperboard. Cellulose 22: 3377–3395, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0732-x.10.1007/s10570-015-0732-x ↗
17. Hirn, U. and Schennach, R. (2017) Fiber-fiber bond formation and failure: mechanisms and analytical techniques. In: Batchelor, W., and Söderberg, D. (Eds.). Trans. Of the XVIth fund. Res. Symp. Oxford, 2017. Fundamental Research Committee (FRC), Manchester, Oxford, pp. 839–863.10.15376/frc.2017.2.839 ↗
18. Hubbe, M.A. (2006). Bonding between cellulosic fibers in the absence and presence of dry-strength agents – a review. Bioresources 1: 281–318, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.1.2.281-318.10.15376/biores.1.2.281-318 ↗
19. Islam, M.R. and Picu, R.C. (2018). Effect of network architecture on the mechanical behavior of random fiber networks. J. Appl. Mech, Trans. ASME 85, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040245/422743.10.1115/1.4040245 ↗
20. Kim, J.-M., Hwang, M.-G., Oh, K., Jung Youn, H., and Lee, H.-L. (2018a). How can we improve strength property of dry formed papers? Appita: technology, innovation. Manuf., Environ. 71: 58–65, https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.
21. Kim, J.W., Kim, J.M., Oh, K., and Lee, H.L. (2018b). Strength improvement of dry formed paper by spraying of dry strength agent and hot pressing. Appita : technology, innovation. Manuf., Environ. 71: 66–71.
22. Lindberg, G. and Kulachenko, A. (2022a). The effect of ply properties in paperboard converting operations: a way to increase formability. Cellulose 29: 6865–6887, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04673-9.10.1007/s10570-022-04673-9 ↗
23. Lindberg, G. and Kulachenko, A. (2022b). Tray forming operation of paperboard: a case study using implicit finite element analysis. Packag. Technol. Sci. 35: 183–198, https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2619.10.1002/pts.2619 ↗
24. Linvill, E. and Östlund, S. (2014). The combined effects of moisture and temperature on the mechanical response of paper. Exp. Mech. 54: 1329–1341, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9898-7.10.1007/s11340-014-9898-7 ↗
25. Loist, M., Kleinert, R., Miletzky, F., and Schreiber, S. (2024). Comparison of bleached hardwood and softwood kraft dry pulps for semi-dry papermaking with different dry forming processes. Holztechnologie 2: 32–37.
26. Marin, G., Nygårds, M., and Östlund, S. (2020). Stiffness and strength properties of five paperboards and their moisture dependency. Tappi J. 19: 71–85, https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ19.2.71.10.32964/TJ19.2.71 ↗
27. Nygårds, M. and Malnory, J. (2010). Paper physics: measuring the out-of-plane shear strength profiles in different paper qualities. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 25: 366–371, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2010-25-03-p366-371.10.3183/npprj-2010-25-03-p366-371 ↗
28. Nygårds, M., Fellers, C., and Östlund, S. (2007). Measuring out-of-plane shear properties of paperboard. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 33: 105–109.
29. Östlund, M., Borodulina, S., and Östlund, S. (2011). Influence of paperboard structure and processing conditions on forming of complex paperboard structures. Packag. Technol. Sci. 24: 331–341, https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.942.10.1002/pts.942 ↗
30. Pan, N. and Carnaby, G.A. (1989). Theory of the shear deformation of fibrous assemblies. Text. Res. J. 59: 285–292, https://doi.org/10.1177/004051758905900506.10.1177/004051758905900506 ↗
31. Pasquier, E., Mörseburg, K., Syverud, K., and Ruwoldt, J. (2024). Effect of raw material and process conditions during the dry forming of CTMP fibers for molded pulp products. J. Nat. Fibers 21, https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2024.2409890.10.1080/15440478.2024.2409890 ↗
32. Pelton, R. (1993). A model of the external surface of wood pulp fibers. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 8: 113–119, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1993-08-01-p113-119.10.3183/npprj-1993-08-01-p113-119 ↗
33. Picu, R.C. (2011). Mechanics of random fiber networks – a review. Soft Matter 7: 6768, https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm05022b.10.1039/c1sm05022b ↗
34. Robertsson, K., Engqvist, J., Wallin, M., Ristinmaa, M., Tryding, J., and Borgqvist, E. (2023). Out-of-plane uniaxial loading of paperboard: experimental procedure and evaluation. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 38: 389–398, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2023-0017.10.1515/npprj-2023-0017 ↗
35. Semple, K.E., Zhou, C., Rojas, O.J., Nkeuwa, W.N., and Dai, C. (2022). Moulded pulp fibers for disposable food packaging: a state-of-the-art review. Food Packag. Shelf Life 33: 100908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100908.10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100908 ↗
36. Srinivasa, P., Sundström, J., and Nygårds, M. (2018). Shear mechanics: evaluation of paperboard and liner shear properties using rigid block shear test method. RISE Bioeconomy report number: 9. Unpublished.
37. Tjahjanto, D.D., Girlanda, O., and Östlund, S. (2015). Anisotropic viscoelastic–viscoplastic continuum model for high-density cellulose-based materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 84: 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.07.002.10.1016/j.jmps.2015.07.002 ↗
38. Toll, S. (1998). Packing mechanics of fiber reinforcements. Polym. Eng. Sci. 38: 1337–1350, https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10304.10.1002/pen.10304 ↗
39. Tryding, J. (1996). Plane fracture of paper. Lund University, Lund.
40. van Wyk, C.M. (1946). Note on the compressibility of wool. J. Text. Inst. Trans. 37: T285–T292, https://doi.org/10.1080/19447024608659279.10.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
41. Wågberg, L. and Annergren, G. (1997). Physicochemical characterization of papermaking fibres. In: Baker, C.F. (Ed.). Trans. of the XIth fund. Res. Symp. Cambridge, 1997. Fundamental Research Committee (FRC), Manchester, pp. 1–82.10.15376/frc.1997.1.1 ↗
42. Weise, U., Maloney, T., and Paulapuro, H. (1996). Quantification of water in different states of interaction with wood pulp fibres. Cellulose 3: 189–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228801.10.1007/BF02228801 ↗
43. Wilson, A. (2010). 1 - The formation of dry, wet, spunlaid and other types of nonwovens. Applications of Nonwovens in Technical Textiles 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845699741.1.3.10.1533/9781845699741.1.3 ↗