journal article·2022-09-27

Fibers pre-treatments with sodium silicate affect the properties of suspensions, films, and quality index of cellulose micro/nanofibrils

Adriano Reis Prazeres Mascarenhas, Mário Vanoli Scatolino, Matheus Cordazzo Dias, Maria Alice Martins, Rafael Rodolfo de Melo, Renato Augusto Pereira Damásio, Maressa Carvalho Mendonça, Gustavo Henrique Denzin Tonoli

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The characteristics of cellulose micro/nanofibrils (MFC/CNF) can be improved with pre-treatments of the original fibers. The present work is proposed to study pre-treatment with sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) on bleached fibers of Eucalyptus sp. (EUC) and Pinus sp. (PIN) and its effects on the quality index of MFC/CNF. Particle homogeneity, turbidity, and microstructure of the suspensions were evaluated. Similarly, the physical-mechanical, and barrier properties of the films were studied. With the results obtained for suspensions and films, the quality index (QI) was MFC/CNF calculated. The smallest particle dimension was observed for MFC/CNF of Pinus sp. with 10 % of Na2SiO3, as well as the lowest turbidity (∼350 NTU) was obtained for MFC/CNF of Pinus sp. with 5 % of Na2SiO3. The pre-treatments reduced the transparency of the films by ∼25 % for EUC and ∼20 % for PIN. The films presented a suitable barrier to UVC radiation, water vapor, and oil. The tensile strength of EUC and PIN films was increased by 20 % using 10 % of Na2SiO3. The same concentration of Na2SiO3 provided QI 70 for EUC MFC/CNF. The Na2SiO3 was efficient to obtain the MFC/CNF with interesting properties and suitable to generate films with parameters required for packaging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Forest Engineering , Federal University of Rondônia (UNIR) , Rolim de Moura , RO , Brazil

Department of Production Engineering , State University of Amapá (UEAP) , Macapá , AP , Brazil

Agricultural Sciences Center , 74384 Federal University of the Semiarid (UFERSA) , Mossoró , RN , Brazil

Department of Forest Science , 67739 Federal University of Lavras (UFLA) , C. P. 3037 , Lavras , MG , Brazil

Embrapa Instrumentation – National Laboratory of Nanotechnology for Agribusiness , São Carlos , SP , Brazil

Klabin – Technology Center , Fazenda Monte Alegre , Santa Harmonia, 03 , Telêmaco Borba , PR , Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Afsahi, G., Dimic-Misic, K., Gane, P., Budtova, T., Maloney, T., Vuorinen, T. (2018) The investigation of rheological and strength properties of NFC hydrogels and aerogels from hardwood pulp by short catalytic bleaching (Hcat). Cellulose 25:1637–1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1678-6.10.1007/s10570-018-1678-6 ↗
2. Albornoz-Palma, G., Ching, D., Valerio, O., Mendonça, R.T., Pereira, M. (2020) Effect of lignin and hemicellulose on the properties of lignocellulose nanofibril suspensions. Cellulose 27:10631–10647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03304-5.10.1007/s10570-020-03304-5 ↗
3. Amalraj, A., Gopi, S., Thomas, S., Haponiuk, J.T. (2018) Cellulose nanomaterials in biomedical, food, and Nutraceutical Applications: A Review. Macromol. Symp. 380:1800115. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201800115.10.1002/masy.201800115 ↗
4. Amini, E., Hafez, I., Tajvidi, M., Bousfield, D.W. (2020) Cellulose and lignocellulose nanofibril suspensions and films: A comparison. Carbohydr. Polym. 250:117011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117011.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117011 ↗
5. Ang, S., Haritos, V., Batchelor, W. (2019) Effect of refining and homogenization on nanocellulose fiber development, sheet strength and energy consumption. Cellulose 26:4767–4786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02400-5.10.1007/s10570-019-02400-5 ↗
6. ASTM Standard (2012) E-104-02, Standard Practice for Maintaining Constant Relative Humidity by Means of Aqueous Solutions.
7. ASTM Standard (2016) ASTM E-96, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials.
8. ASTM Standard (2018) ASTM D882-18, Standard Test Methods for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting.
9. Aulin, C., Yun, S.H., Wagberg, L., Lindström, T. (2009) Design of Highly Oleophobic Cellulose Surfaces from Structured Silicon Templates. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1:2443–2452. https://doi.org/10.1021/am900394y.10.1021/am900394y ↗
10. Balea, A., Fuente, E., Monte, M.C., Merayo, N., Campano, C., Negro, C., Blanco, A. (2020) Industrial Application of Nanocelluloses in Papermaking: A Review of Challenges, Technical Solutions, and Market Perspectives. Molecules 25:256. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030526.10.3390/molecules25030526 ↗
11. Banvillet, G., Depres, G., Belgacem, N., Bras, J. (2021a) Alkaline treatment combined with enzymatic hydrolysis for efficient cellulose nanofibrils production. Carbohydr. Polym. 255:117383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117383.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117383 ↗
12. Banvillet, G., Gatt, E., Belgacem, N., Bras, J. (2021b) Cellulose fibers deconstruction by twin-screw extrusion with in situ enzymatic hydrolysis via bioextrusion. Bioresour. Technol. 327:124819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124819.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124819 ↗
13. Bastante, C.C., Silva, N.H.C.S., Cardoso, L.C., Serrano, C.M., Ossa, E.J.M., Freire, C.S.R., Vilela, C. (2021) Biobased films of nanocellulose and mango leaf extract for active food packaging: Supercritical impregnation versus solvent casting. Food Hydrocoll. 117:106709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106709.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106709 ↗
14. Bedane, A.H., Eic, M., Farmahini-Farahani, M., Xiao, H. (2015) Water vapor transport properties of regenerated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose films. J. Membr. Sci. 493:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.009.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.009 ↗
15. Bejoy, T., Midhun, C.R., Athira, K.B., Rubiyah, M.H., Jithin, J., Audrey, M., Drisko, G.L., Sanchez, C. (2018) Nanocellulose, a Versatile Green Platform: From Biosources to Materials and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 24:11575–11625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00627.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00627 ↗
16. Berto, G.L., Arantes, V. (2019) Kinetic changes in cellulose properties during defibrillation into microfibrillated cellulose and cellulose nanofibrils by ultra-refining. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 127:637–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.169.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.169 ↗
17. Cazón, P., Velazquez, G., Vázquez, M. (2020) Characterization of mechanical and barrier properties of bacterial cellulose, glycerol and polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) composite films with eco-friendly UV-protective properties. Food Hydrocolloides 99:105323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105323.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105323 ↗
18. Chanda, S., Bajwa, D.S. (2021) A review of current physical techniques for dispersion of cellulose nanomaterials in polymer matrices. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 60:325–341. https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2021-0023.10.1515/rams-2021-0023 ↗
19. Claro, F.C., Matos, M., Jordão, C., Avelino, F., Lomonaco, D., Magalhães, W.L.E. (2019) Enhanced microfibrillated cellulose-based film by controlling the hemicellulose content and MFC rheology. Carbohydr. Polym. 218:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.089.10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.089 ↗
20. Cruz, T.M., Mascarenhas, A.R.P., Scatolino, M.V., Faria, D.L., Matos, L.C., Duarte, P.J., Neto, J.M., Mendes, L.M., Tonoli, G.H.D. (2022) Hybrid films from plant and bacterial nanocellulose: mechanical and barrier properties. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2021-0036.10.1515/npprj-2021-0036 ↗
21. Desmaisons, J., Boutonnet, E., Rueff, M., Dufresne, A., Bras, J. (2017) A new quality index for benchmarking of different cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr. Polym. 174:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032.10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032 ↗
22. Desmaisons, J., Gustafsson, E., Dufresne, A., Bras, J. (2018) Hybrid nanopaper of cellulose nanofibrils and PET microfibers with high tear and crumpling resistance. Cellulose 25:7127–7142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2044-4.10.1007/s10570-018-2044-4 ↗
23. Dias, M.C., Belgacem, M.N., Resende, J.V., Martins, M.A., Damásio, R.A.P., Tonoli, G.H.D., Ferreira, S.R. (2022) Eco-friendly laccase and cellulase enzymes pretreatment for optimized production of high content lignin-cellulose nanofibrils. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 209:413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.005.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.005 ↗
24. Dias, M.C., Mendonça, M.C., Damásio, R.A.P., Zidanes, U.L., Mori, F.A., Ferreira, S.R., Tonoli, G.H.D. (2019) Influence of hemicellulose content of Eucalyptus and Pinus fibers on the grinding process for obtaining cellulose micro/nanofibrils. Holzforschung 73:1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2018-0230.10.1515/hf-2018-0230 ↗
25. Dimic-Misic, K., Kostic, M., Obradovic, B., Kramar, A., Jovanovic, S., Stepanenko, D., Mitrovic-Dankulov, M., Lazovic, S., Johansson, L.S., Maloney, T., Gane, P. (2019) Nitrogen plasma surface treatment for improving polar ink adhesion on micro/nanofibrillated cellulose films. Cellulose 26:3845–3857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02269-4.10.1007/s10570-019-02269-4 ↗
26. Espinosa, E., Rol, F., Bras, J., Rodríguez, A. (2020) Use of multi-factorial analysis to determine the quality of cellulose nanofibers: effect of nanofibrillation treatment and residual lignin content. Cellulose 27:10689–10705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03136-3.10.1007/s10570-020-03136-3 ↗
27. Espitia, P.J.P., Du, W.X., Avena-Bustillos, R.J., Soares, N.F.F., Mchugh, T.H. (2014) Edible films from pectin: Physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties - A review. Food Hydrocoll. 35:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.06.005.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.06.005 ↗
28. Fakhouri, F.M., Costa, D., Yamashita, F., Martelli, S.M., Jesus, R.C., Alganer, K., Collares-Queiroz, F.P., Innocentini-Mei, L.H. (2013) Comparative study of processing methods for starch/gelatin films. Carbohydr. Polym. 95:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.027.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.027 ↗
29. Fonseca, A.S., Panthapulakkal, S., Konar, S.K., Sain, M., Bufalino, L., Raabe, J., Miranda, I.P.A., Martins, M.A., Tonoli, G.H.D. (2019) Improving cellulose nanofibrillation of non-wood fiber using alkaline and bleaching pre-treatments. Ind. Crop. Prod. 131:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.046.10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.046 ↗
30. From, M., Larsson, P.T., Andreasson, B., Medronho, B., Svanedal, I., Edlund, H., Norgren, M. (2020) Tuning the properties of regenerated cellulose: Effects of polarity and water solubility of the coagulation medium. Carbohydr. Polym. 236:116068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116068.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116068 ↗
31. Fukuzumi, H., Saito, T., Isogai, A. (2013) Influence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril length on film properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 93:172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.069.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.069 ↗
32. Grigatti, M., Montecchio, D., Francioso, O., Ciavatta, C. (2015) Structural and Thermal Investigation of Three Agricultural Biomasses Following Mild-NaOH Pretreatment to Increase Anaerobic Biodegradability. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 6:1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9423-y.10.1007/s12649-015-9423-y ↗
33. Guan, Q.F., Yang, H.B., Han, Z.M., Zhou, L.C., Zhu, Y.B., Ling, Z.C., Jiang, H.B., Wang, P.F., Ma, T., Wu, H.A., Yu, S.H. (2020) Lightweight, tough, and sustainable cellulose nanofiber-derived bulk structural materials with low thermal expansion coefficient. Sci. Adv. 6:eaaz1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz1114.10.1126/sciadv.aaz1114 ↗
34. Guimarães, I.C., Reis, K.C., Menezes, E.G.T., Rodrigues, A.C., Silva, T.F., Oliveira, I.R.N., Boas, E.V.B. (2016) Cellulose microfibrillated suspension of carrots obtained by mechanical defibrillation and their application in edible starch films. Ind. Crop. Prod. 89:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.024.10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.024 ↗
35. Hasan, I., Wang, J., Tajvidi, M. (2021) Tuning physical, mechanical and barrier properties of cellulose nanofibril films through film drying techniques coupled with thermal compression. Cellulose 28:11345–11366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04269-9.10.1007/s10570-021-04269-9 ↗
36. Hashem, M., El-Bisi, M., Sharaf, S., Refaie, R. (2010) Pre-cationization of cotton fabrics: An effective alternative tool for activation of hydrogen peroxide bleaching process. Carbohydr. Polym. 79:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.038.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.038 ↗
37. Hou, G., Liu, Y., Li, D.Z.G., Xie, H., Fang, Z. (2020) Approaching Theoretical Haze of Highly Transparent All-Cellulose Composite Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12:31998–32005. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c08586.10.1021/acsami.0c08586 ↗
38. Hsieh, M.C., Koga, H., Suganuma, K., Nogi, M. (2017) Hazy Transparent Cellulose Nanopaper. Sci. Rep. 7:41590. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41590.10.1038/srep41590 ↗
39. Jaiswal, A.K., Kumar, V., Khakalo, A., Lahtinen, P., Solin, K., Pere, J., Toivakka, M. (2021) Rheological behavior of high consistency enzymatically fibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 28:2087–2104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03688-y.10.1007/s10570-021-03688-y ↗
40. Jin, K., Tang, Y., Liu, J., Wang, J., Ye, C. (2021) Nanofibrillated cellulose as coating agent for food packaging paper. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 168:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.066.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.066 ↗
41. Jing, M., Zhang, L., Fan, Z., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Chuntai, L., Shen, C. (2022) Markedly improved hydrophobicity of cellulose film via a simple one-step aminosilane-assisted ball milling. Carbohydr. Polym. 275:119701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118701.10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118701 ↗
42. Kamel, R., El-Wakil, N.A., Dufresne, A., Elkasabgy, N.A. (2020) Nanocellulose: From an agricultural waste to a valuable pharmaceutical ingredient. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 163:1579–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.242.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.242 ↗
43. Karina, M., Satoto, R., Abdullah, A.D., Yudianti, R. (2020) Properties of nanocellulose obtained from sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) fiber by acid hydrolysis in combination with high-pressure homogenization. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 54:33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.04.10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.04 ↗
44. Kim, H.J., Roy, S., Rhim, J.W. (2021) Effects of various types of cellulose nanofibers on the physical properties of the CNF-based films. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9:106043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106043.10.1016/j.jece.2021.106043 ↗
45. Kolakovic, R., Peltonen, L., Laukkanen, A., Hirvonen, J., Laaksonen, T. (2012) Nanofibrillar cellulose films for controlled drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 82:308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.06.011.10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.06.011 ↗
46. Kumar, V., Bollström, R., Yang, A., Chen, Q., Chen, G., Salminen, P., Bousfield, D., Toivakka, M. (2014) Comparison of nano- and microfibrillated cellulose films. Cellulose 21:3443–3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0357-5.10.1007/s10570-014-0357-5 ↗
47. Kumar, V., Pathak, P., Bhardwaj, N.K. (2021) Micro-nanofibrillated cellulose preparation from bleached softwood pulp using chemo-refining approach and its evaluation as strength enhancer for paper properties. Appl. Nanosci. 11:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01575-9.10.1007/s13204-020-01575-9 ↗
48. Lago, C.R., Oliveira, A.L.M., Dias, M.C., Carvalho, E.E.N., Tonoli, G.H.D., Vilas Boas, E.V.B. (2020) Obtaining cellulosic nanofibrils from oat straw for biocomposite reinforcement: Mechanical and barrier properties. Ind. Crop. Prod. 148:112264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112264.10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112264 ↗
49. Li, Q., Wu, Y., Fang, R., Lei, C., Li, Y., Li, Y., Li, B., Pei, Y., Luo, X., Liu, S. (2021) Application of Nanocellulose as particle stabilizer in food Pickering emulsion: Scope, Merits and challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 110:573–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.027.10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.027 ↗
50. Li, W., Wang, S., Wang, W., Qin, C., Wu, M. (2019) Facile preparation of reactive hydrophobic cellulose nanofibril film for reducing water vapor permeability (WVP) in packaging applications. Cellulose 26:3271–3284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02270-x.10.1007/s10570-019-02270-x ↗
51. Liang, C., Ruan, K., Zhang, Y., Gu, J. (2020) Multifunctional Flexible Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Silver Nanowires/Cellulose Films with Excellent Thermal Management and Joule Heating Performances. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12:18023–18031. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c04482?ref=pdf.10.1021/acsami.0c04482 ↗
52. Malucelli, L.C., Matos, M., Jordão, C., Lomonaco, D., Lacerda, L.G., Carvalho Filho, M.A.S., Magalhães, W.L.E. (2019) Influence of cellulose chemical pretreatment on energy consumption and viscosity of produced cellulose nanofibers (CNF) and mechanical properties of nanopapers. Cellulose 26:1667–1681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2161-0.10.1007/s10570-018-2161-0 ↗
53. Martins, C.C.N., Dias, M.C., Mendonça, M.C., Durães, A.F.S., Silva, L.E., Félix, J.R., Damásio, R.A.P., Tonoli, G.H.D. (2021) Optimizing cellulose microfibrillation with NaOH pretreatments for unbleached Eucalyptus pulp. Cellulose 28:11519–11531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04221-x.10.1007/s10570-021-04221-x ↗
54. Mascarenhas, A.R.P., Scatolino, M.V., Santos, A.A., Norcino, L.B., Duarte, P.J., Melo, R.R., Dias, M.C., Faria, C.E.T., Mendonça, M.C., Tonoli, G.H.D. (2022) Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films reinforced with cellulose micro/nanofibrils: study of physical, optical, surface, barrier and mechanical properties. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2022-0006.10.1515/npprj-2022-0006 ↗
55. Melati, R.B., Shimizu, F.L., Oliveira, G., Pagnocca, F.C., Souza, W., Sant’Anna, C., Brienzo, M. (2019) Key Factors Affecting the Recalcitrance and Conversion Process of Biomass. BioEnergy Res. 12:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-018-9941-0.10.1007/s12155-018-9941-0 ↗
56. Moghaddam, M.K., Karimi, E. (2020) The effect of oxidative bleaching treatment on Yucca fiber for potential composite application. Cellulose 27:9383–9396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03433-x.10.1007/s10570-020-03433-x ↗
57. Mohammed, N., Grishkewich, N., Tam, K.C. (2018) Cellulose nanomaterials: promising sustainable nanomaterials for application in water/wastewater treatment processes. Environ. Sci. Nano. 5:623–658. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EN01029J.10.1039/C7EN01029J ↗
58. Mohtaschemi, M., Dimic-Misic, K., Puisto, A., Korhonen, M., Maloney, T., Paltakari, J., Alava, M.J. (2014) Rheological characterization of fibrillated cellulose suspensions via bucket vane viscosimeter. Cellulose 21:1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0235-1.10.1007/s10570-014-0235-1 ↗
59. Mokhena, T.C., John, M.J. (2020) Cellulose nanomaterials: new generation materials for solving global issues. Cellulose 27:1149–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w.10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w ↗
60. Mokhena, T.C., Sadiku, E.R., Mochane, M.J., Ray, S.S., John, M.J., Mtibe, A. (2021) Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibril papers and their bionanocomposites: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 273:118507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118507.10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118507 ↗
61. Moraes, J.O., Scheibe, A.S., Sereno, A., Laurindo, J.B. (2013) Scale-up of the production of cassava starch based films using tape casting. J. Food Eng. 119:800–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.07.009.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.07.009 ↗
62. Moser, C., Lindström, M.E., Henriksson, G. (2015) Toward Industrially Feasible Methods for Following the Process of Manufacturing Cellulose Nanofibers. BioResources 10:2360–2375. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.2.2360-2375.10.15376/biores.10.2.2360-2375 ↗
63. Nascimento, E.S., Barros, M.O., Cerqueira, M.A., Lima, H.L., Borges, M.F., Pastrana, L.M., Gama, F.M., Rosa, M.F., Azeredo, H.M.C., Gonçalves, C. (2021) All-cellulose nanocomposite films based on bacterial cellulose nanofibrils and nanocrystals. Food Packag. Shelf Life 29:100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100715.10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100715 ↗
64. Niu, X., Liu, Y., Fang, G., Huang, C., Rojas, O.J., Pan, H. (2018) Highly Transparent, Strong, and Flexible Films with Modified Cellulose Nanofiber Bearing UV Shielding Property. Biomacromolecules 19:4565–4575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01252.10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01252 ↗
65. Noorbakhsh-Soltani, S.M., Zerafat, M.M., Sabbaghi, S. (2018) A comparative study of gelatin and starch-based nano-composite films modified by nano-cellulose and chitosan for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 189:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.012.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.012 ↗
66. Noremylia, M.B., Hassan, M.Z., Ismail, Z. (2022) Recent advancement in isolation, processing, characterization and applications of emerging nanocellulose: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 206:954–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.064.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.064 ↗
67. Osong, S.H., Norgren, S., Engstrand, P. (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23:23–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0798-5.10.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 ↗
68. Perrin, L., Gillet, G., Gressin, L., Desobry, S. (2020) Interest of pickering emulsions for sustainable micro/nanocellulose in food and cosmetic applications. Polymers 12:2385. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102385.10.3390/polym12102385 ↗
69. Qaseem, M.F., Shaheen, H., Wu, A.M. (2021) Cell wall hemicellulose for sustainable industrial utilization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 144:110996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110996.10.1016/j.rser.2021.110996 ↗
70. Qu, J., Yuan, Z., Wang, C., Wang, A., Liu, X., Wei, B., Wen, Y. (2019) Enhancing the redispersibility of TEMPO-mediated oxidized cellulose nanofibrils in N,N-dimethylformamide by modification with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Cellulose 26:7769–7780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02655-y.10.1007/s10570-019-02655-y ↗
71. R CORE TEAM (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Acessado 15 dez 2020.
72. Raj, P., Varanasi, S., Batchelor, W., Garnier, G. (2015) Effect of cationic polyacrylamide on the processing and properties of nanocellulose films. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 447:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.019.10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.019 ↗
73. Rol, F., Banvillet, G., Meyer, V., Petit-Conil, M., Bras, J. (2018) Combination of twin-screw extruder and homogenizer to produce high-quality nanofibrillated cellulose with low energy consumption. Journal of Material. Science 53:12604–12615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2414-1.10.1007/s10853-018-2414-1 ↗
74. Rol, F., Belgacem, M.N., Gandini, A., Bras, J. (2019) Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils. Prog. Polym. Sci. 88:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002 ↗
75. Rueden, C.T., Schindelin, J., Hiner, M.C., Dezonia, B.E., Walter, A.E., Arena, E.T., Eliceiri, K.W. (2017) ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 18:529. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z.10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
76. Santucci, B.S., Bras, J., Belgacem, M.N., Curvelo, A.A.S., Pimenta, M.T.B. (2016) Evaluation of the effects of chemical composition and refining treatments on the properties of nanofibrillated cellulose films from sugarcane bagasse. Ind. Crop. Prod. 91:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.07.017.10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.07.017 ↗
77. Shimizu, M., Saito, T., Isogai, A. (2016) Water-resistant and high oxygen-barrier nanocellulose films with interfibrillar cross-linkages formed through multivalent metal ions. J. Membr. Sci. 500:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.002.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.002 ↗
78. Sothornvit, R., Hong, Si., An, D.J., Rhim, J.W. (2010) Effect of clay content on the physical and antimicrobial properties of whey protein isolate/organo-clay composite films. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol. 43:279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.08.010.10.1016/j.lwt.2009.08.010 ↗
79. Suhag, R., Kumar, N., Petkoska, A.T., Upadhyay, A. (2020) Film formation and deposition methods of edible coating on food products: A review. Food Res. Int. 136:109582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109582.10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109582 ↗
80. Sukmawan, R., Kusmono, Rahmanta, A.P., Saputri, L.H. (2022) The effect of repeated alkali pretreatments on the morphological characteristics of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber-reinforced epoxy adhesive composite. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 114:103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103095.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103095 ↗
81. TAPPI Standard (2012) T 559 cm-12, Grease resistance test for paper and paperboard.
82. TAPPI Standard (2013) T 410 om-08, Grammage of paper and paperboard.
83. TAPPI Standard (2015) T 411 om-15, Thickness of paper, paperboard, and combined board.
84. TAPPI Standard (2021a) T 249 cm-21, Carbohydrate composition of extractive-free wood and wood pulp by gas-liquid chromatography.
85. TAPPI Standard (2021b) T 222 om-21, Acid-soluble lignin in wood and pulp.
86. TAPPI Standard (2021c) T 402 sp-21, Standard conditioning and testing atmospheres for paper, board, pulp handsheets, and related products.
87. Tayeb, A.H., Amini, E., Ghasemi, S., Tajvidi, M. (2018) Cellulose Nanomaterials – Binding Properties and Applications: A Review. Molecules 23:2684. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102684.10.3390/molecules23102684 ↗
88. Teodoro, K.B.R., Sanfelice, R.C., Migliorini, F.L., Pavinatto, A., Facure, M.H.M., Correa, D.S. (2021) A Review on the Role and Performance of Cellulose Nanomaterials in Sensors. ACS Sens. 6:2473–2496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c00473.10.1021/acssensors.1c00473 ↗
89. Trovagunta, R., Kelley, S.S., Lavoine, N. (2021) Highlights on the mechanical pre-refining step in the production of wood cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 28:11329–11344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04226-6.10.1007/s10570-021-04226-6 ↗
90. Turpeinen, T., Jäsberg, A., Haavisto, S., Liukkonen, J., Salmela, J., Koponen, A.I. (2020) Pipe rheology of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 27:141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02784-4.10.1007/s10570-019-02784-4 ↗
91. Tyagi, P., Hubbe, M.A., Lucia, L., Pal, L. (2018) High performance nanocellulose-based composite coatings for oil and grease resistance. Cellulose 25:3377–3391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1810-7.10.1007/s10570-018-1810-7 ↗
92. Verker, R., Grossman, E., Eliaz, N. (2009) Erosion of POSS-polyimide films under hypervelocity impact and atomic oxygen: The role of mechanical properties at elevated temperatures. Acta Mater. 57:1112–1119. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.054.10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.054 ↗
93. Wang, J., Gardner, D.J., Stark, N.M., Bousfield, D.W., Tajvidi, M., Cai, Z. (2018) Moisture and Oxygen Barrier Properties of Cellulose Nanomaterial-Based Films. ACS Sustainable Chemistry &. Engineering 6:46–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523 ↗
94. Wang, L., Chen, C., Wang, J., Gardner, D.J., Tajvidi, M. (2020) Cellulose nanofibrils versus cellulose nanocrystals: Comparison of performance in flexible multilayer films for packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 23:100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100464.10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100464 ↗
95. Wang, Q., Zhu, J.Y., Considine, J.M. (2013) Strong and Optically Transparent Films Prepared Using Cellulosic Solid Residue Recovered from Cellulose Nanocrystals Production Waste Stream. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5:7. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302967m.10.1021/am302967m ↗
96. Wu, C., McClements, D.V., He, M., Zheng, L., Tian, T., Teng, F., Li, Y. (2021) Preparation and characterization of okara nanocellulose fabricated using sonication or high-pressure homogenization treatments. Carbohydr. Polym. 255:117364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117364.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117364 ↗
97. Xinping, L., Nan, W., Xin, Z., Hui, C., Yaoyu, W., Zhao, Z. (2020) Optical haze regulation of cellulose nanopaper via morphological tailoring and nano-hybridization of cellulose nanoparticles. Cellulose 27:1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02876-1.10.1007/s10570-019-02876-1 ↗
98. Yang, X., Berthold, F., Berglund, L.A. (2019a) High-Density Molded Cellulose Fibers and Transparent Biocomposites Based on Oriented Holocellulose. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11:10310–10319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b22134.10.1021/acsami.8b22134 ↗
99. Yang, W., Jiao, L., Liu, W., Dai, H. (2019b) Manufacture of Highly Transparent and Hazy Cellulose Nanofibril Films via Coating TEMPO-Oxidized Wood Fibers. Nanomaterials 9:107. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010107.10.3390/nano9010107 ↗
100. Yook, S., Park, H., Park, H., Lee, S.Y., Kwon, J., Youn, H.J. (2020) Barrier coatings with various types of cellulose nanofibrils and their barrier properties. Cellulose 27:4509–4523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03061-5.10.1007/s10570-020-03061-5 ↗