journal article·2019-03-26

Principles of developing physical test methods for disposable consumer products

Young Chan Ko, Jung Yoon Park, Lili Melani, Na Young Park, Hyoung Jin Kim

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Strength, softness, and absorbency have been identified as the key attributes for disposable consumer products such as tissue, towel and diapers. These attributes are generally evaluated subjectively by users. Although subjective evaluation may be necessary for developing such consumer products, it is time-consuming and expensive. More importantly, it seldom provides guidance or direction regarding process control or product development. The main reason is because subjective evaluation is performed after the fact (ex post facto), not before the event (not ex ante). Accordingly, it has been desirable to develop physical test methods to predict in-use performance of a consumer product. In developing physical test methods to link with subjective evaluation, reliable and relevant subjective data is necessary. Developing physical test methods for softness of hygiene paper has been extremely challenging. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate a feasibility of developing physical test methods which can be highly related to subjective evaluation. To this end, it is hypothesized that tissue softness mainly consists of bulk softness and surface softness. It is assumed that the bulk softness should be determined from bulk stiffness which is defined as the slope between the two specified points in a load-elongation curve from tensile testing. It is also assumed that the surface softness should be determined from the surface properties (roughness and friction) from a surface tester (e. g., Model: KES-SESRU. Kato Tech, Japan). It is suggested that the principles used here for developing physical test methods for tissue softness should be also applicable to other physical properties such as strength and absorbency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Color perception and design · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Forest Products and Biotechnology , 34967 Kookmin University , Seoul , , Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Ampulski, R.S., Sawdai, A.H., Spendel, W., Weinstein, B. (1991) Methods for the measurement of the mechanical properties of tissue paper. In: Proceedings of the International Paper Physics Conference. pp. 19–30.
2. Bates, J.D. (1965) Softness index: Fact or mirrage? Tappi J. 48(4):63A–64A.
3. Beuther, P.D. Beuther, P.D., Ko, Y., Pawar, P., Raynor Jr., W.J., Rekoske, M.J., Ries, T.D. (2012) Molded wet-pressed tissue, US Patent, 8,257,552. Kimberly Clark Worldwide.
4. Brown, T.M.A. (1939) Method of determining softness of soft papers. Pap. Mill News 62(23):19–21.
5. Carstens, J.E. (1981) Layered paper having a soft and smooth velutinous surface and method of making such paper, US Patent, 4,300,981.
6. Clark, J.D.A. (1935) Determining the rigidity, stiffness, and softness of paper. Pap. Trade J. Tech. Sect. 169–175.
7. Dwiggins, J.H., Harper, F.D., Schilz, G.A., Schuh, B.J., Heath, M.S., Oriaran, T.P. (2003) Soft bulky multi-ply product and method of making the same, US Patent, 6,558,511. Fort James Corporation.
8. Gallaway, W. (1973) Textural properties of paper: Measurements and fundamental relationships in the fundamental properties of paper related to its uses. In: Transactions of the Symposium Held at Cambridge, Ed. Bolam, F., pp. 684–696.
9. Habeger, C., Pan, Y., Biasca, J. (1989) Empirical relationship between tissue softness and out-of-plane measurements. Tappi J. 95–100.
10. Harper, F.D., Oriaran, T.P., Litvay, J.D. (2002) Soft, bulky single-ply absorbent paper having serpentine configuration, US Patent, 6,372,087. Fort James Corporation.
11. Hollmark, H. (1983) Mechanical Properties of Paper and Paperboard. Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 497–524.
12. Kawabata, S. The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation. 2nd ed. Textile Institute, 1980, 97.
13. Ko, Y.C., Park, J.M. (2016) Developing objective linear scale data from subjective tests for consumer products. J. Korea Tappi 48(1):19–26.10.7584/ktappi.2016.48.1.019 ↗
14. Ko, Y.C., Park, J.M., Moon, B.G. (2015) Development of an objective softness evaluation method and its standardization for hygiene paper. J. Korea Tappi 47(5):80–84.10.7584/ktappi.2015.47.5.080 ↗
15. Lashof, T.W. (1965) Notes on the performance of the Handle-O-Meter. Tappi J. 48(4):60–61.
16. Lee, J.H., Park, J.Y., Kim, H.J., Ko, Y.C. (2017) A new subjective evaluation method for hygiene paper. J. Korea Tappi 49(4):178–183.10.7584/JKTAPPI.2017.08.49.4.178 ↗
17. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1978.
18. Ramasubramanian, M.K. (2002) Physical and mechanical properties of towel and tissue. In: Handbook of Physical Testing of Paper. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, Ch. 12.
19. Schwartz, M.A., Nothangle, M.A. (1955) Softness tester for sheet material, US Patent, 2,718,142.
20. Spendel, W.U. (1990) Soft tissue paper containing non-cationic surfactant, US Patent, 4,959,125. Procter & Gamble Company. Procter & Gamble Company.
21. TAPPI (1966) Stiffness testing method: Handle-O-Meter.
22. TAPPI T402 sp-08 (2013) Standard conditioning and testing atmospheres for paper, board, pulp handsheets, and related products.
23. Thurstone, L.L. (1927) The law comparative judgment. Physiol. Rev. 34(4):273–286.10.1037/h0070288 ↗
24. Wardwell, F.B. (1965) Papermaking variables and the Handle-O-Meter test. Tappi J. 48(4):60–61.
25. Yokura, H., Kohono, S., Iwasaki, M. (2004) Objective hand measurement of toilet paper. J. Text. Eng. 50(1).10.4188/jte.50.1 ↗