A graph attention network for rotating machinery fault diagnosis driven by multi-channel vibration signal
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the issue of missing feature associations in traditional single-channel analysis methods under multi-sensor monitoring systems, this paper proposes a graph attention network fault diagnosis model based on meta-path guided graph topology construction and hierarchical attention mechanism. This model structurally screens and organises the correlations between channels from the multi-channel signal graph by defining meta-paths, and constructs a meta-graph topology with clear physical meanings. Based on this, the model adopts a hierarchical attention mechanism: intra-graph attention mechanism achieves deep fusion of dual-channel local features within the meta-graph, while inter-graph attention mechanism completes cross-channel global feature enhancement between meta-graphs, forming a hierarchical feature aggregation paradigm of meta-graph construction, intra-channel fusion, and inter-channel enhancement. Experiments on the XJTU and SZ datasets show that the proposed method is significantly superior to the existing methods in terms of classification accuracy and anti-noise robustness. The post-hoc interpretability analysis on the CWRU dataset further verified the model’s effective ability to focus and extract fault frequency domain features.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Army Engineering University of PLA
The 40th Detachment of the 32302 Unit of the PLA
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.004 ↗
2. 10.3390/s2204131010.3390/s22041310 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.10679610.1016/j.knosys.2021.106796 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.10644310.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106443 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10912910.1016/j.engappai.2024.109129 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11223010.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112230 ↗
7. Yang Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Research on composite impact fault identification algorithm based on improved MLP and single sensor data. In: 2022 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management (PHM-Yantai); Yantai, China. IEEE; 2022 Oct; p. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/PHM-Yantai55411.2022.9942075
8. Li Z, Zhang F-Q, Wan S-T. RBFN based on two levels iteration cluster algorithm and its application in generator fault diagnosis. In: 2009 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics; Baoding, China. IEEE; 2009 Jul; p. 1183–1187. doi: 10.1109/ICMLC.2009.521243510.1109/ICMLC.2009.5212435 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.11053210.1016/j.engappai.2025.110532 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11234610.1016/j.measurement.2022.112346 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.141110.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.1411 ↗
12. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.317586610.1109/JSEN.2022.3175866 ↗
13. 10.1109/TII.2022.317901110.1109/TII.2022.3179011 ↗
14. 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.297838610.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
15. 10.1109/TNN.2008.200560510.1109/TNN.2008.2005605 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11036310.1016/j.ress.2024.110363 ↗
17. 10.1109/CAC53003.2021.972817510.1109/CAC53003.2021.9728175 ↗
18. Li C, Mo L, Yan R. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on horizontal visibility graph and graph neural networks. In: 2020 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD); Xi’an, China. IEEE; 2020 Oct; p. 275–279. doi: 10.1109/ICSMD50554.2020.926168710.1109/ICSMD50554.2020.9261687 ↗
19. 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.313237610.1109/TNNLS.2021.3132376 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.10.00710.1016/j.jmsy.2024.10.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.inffus.2025.10327710.1016/j.inffus.2025.103277 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.aei.2025.10315610.1016/j.aei.2025.103156 ↗
23. 10.1109/TII.2024.336699310.1109/TII.2024.3366993 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.aei.2025.10402310.1016/j.aei.2025.104023 ↗
25. 10.1109/TIM.2024.335014310.1109/TIM.2024.3350143 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10596010.1016/j.engappai.2023.105960 ↗
27. 10.3390/math908083010.3390/math9080830 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10865310.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108653 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.dib.2022.10831510.1016/j.dib.2022.108315 ↗
30. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.332778310.1109/JSEN.2023.3327783 ↗
31. 10.48550/arXiv.1606.0937510.48550/arXiv.1606.09375 ↗
32. Li C, Mo L, Yan R. Rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on spatial-temporal GCN. In: 2021 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD); Nanjing, China. IEEE; 2021 Oct; p. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICSMD53520.2021.9670851
33. 10.1109/JSEN.2025.363087310.1109/JSEN.2025.3630873 ↗
34. 10.48550/arXiv.1810.0082610.48550/arXiv.1810.00826 ↗
35. Zhu G, Liu X, Tan L. Bearing fault diagnosis based on sparse wavelet decomposition and sparse graph connection using GraphSAGE. In: 2023 IEEE 2nd International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC); Houston, (TX), USA. IEEE; 2023 Feb; p. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICAIC57335.2023.10044173
36. Morris C et al. Weisfeiler and leman go neural: higher-order graph neural networks. 2021 arXiv: arXiv:1810.02244. 30. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.02244
37. Wu F Zhang T Weinberger KQ. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. arXiv. 2019;20. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.07153