journal article·2026-07-07

Detection of defects in rail bolt holes based on ultrasonic guided waves

Xicheng Feng, Kang Li, Jingmang Xu, Runfeng Gao, Ping Wang, Jun Lai

Publisher page

Abstract

Minor defects are easy to appear at the rail web bolt holes, which seriously affect the safety of trains when passing through, and accurately identifying the bolt hole defects is crucial. Leveraging the symmetry of the rails, this study proposes an innovative guided wave signal processing workflow. This enables the orientation determination and relative size identification of millimetre-scale defects in rail bolt holes. In this paper, a comb excitation method based on the group velocity principle is employed to obtain a single guided wave mode for the detection of bolt holes in the rail web. Then, millimetre-scale defects were fabricated by a hybrid division of hexahedral and tetrahedral elements. The model utilises a circular dot matrix on both sides of the rail web as the signal receiving points. The symmetry of rails is used to superimpose the signals and apply a band-pass filtering process. This allows for the successful localisation of defects in eight positions of bolt holes using cumulative amplitude intensity and normalised dynamic time warping. The model also investigates the relative size recognition of bolt hole defects in terms of length and depth. Furthermore, the feasibility of detecting bolt hole defects was experimentally validated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Southwest Jiaotong University

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Jun L, Jingmang X, Tao L, et al. Investigation on train dynamic derailment in railway turnouts caused by track failure. Eng Fail Anal. 2022;134:106050.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106050 ↗
2. F LY, L MH, S CM, et al. An integrated surrogate model-driven and improved termite life cycle optimizer for damage identification in dams. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2024;208:110986.10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110986 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.10701810.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107018 ↗
4. 10.3390/math1015268910.3390/math10152689 ↗
5. L MH, T S-T, Khatir S, et al. Damage identification in high-rise concrete structures using a bio-inspired meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw. 2023;176:103399.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103399 ↗
6. Pelts SP, Jiao D, Rose JL. A comb transducer for guided wave generation and mode selection[C] ultrasonics symposium. In: Proceedings; San Antonio, TX, USA. IEEE; 1996. Vol. 2. p. 857–860.
7. 10.1002/stc.217110.1002/stc.2171 ↗
8. 10.1155/2021/664182810.1155/2021/6641828 ↗
9. 10.1155/2020/526731810.1155/2020/5267318 ↗
10. 10.1109/58.92070810.1109/58.920708 ↗
11. 10.3390/app906117010.3390/app9061170 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jsv.2024.11831210.1016/j.jsv.2024.118312 ↗
13. 10.3390/app1103107110.3390/app11031071 ↗
14. Erdogmus E, Garcia E, S AA, et al. A novel structural health monitoring method for reinforced concrete bridge decks using ultrasonic guided waves. Infrastructures. 2020;5(6):49.10.3390/infrastructures5060049 ↗
15. 10.1109/TIM.2022.317849210.1109/TIM.2022.3178492 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa52ae10.1088/1361-6501/aa52ae ↗
17. S LP, Lais H, Paruchuri V, et al. Application of ultrasonic guided waves for inspection of high density polyethylene pipe systems. Sensors. 2020;20(11):3184.10.3390/s20113184 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac5a7710.1088/1361-665X/ac5a77 ↗
19. Samaitis V, L M, R R. Assessment of the length and depth of delamination-type defects using ultrasonic guided waves. Appl Sci. 2020;10(15):5236.10.3390/app10155236 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12190210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121902 ↗
21. 10.1177/147592171989388710.1177/1475921719893887 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.10884310.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108843 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10692210.1016/j.measurement.2019.106922 ↗
24. 10.1063/5.024360110.1063/5.0243601 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10611310.1016/j.ultras.2020.106113 ↗
26. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab8b2f10.1088/1361-665X/ab8b2f ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.04510.1016/j.ast.2018.07.045 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00137-310.1016/S0041-624X(02)00137-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.12.01510.1016/j.ultras.2016.12.015 ↗
30. 10.1177/1369433223116110710.1177/13694332231161107 ↗
31. 10.1088/1742-6596/1676/1/01217710.1088/1742-6596/1676/1/012177 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00045-010.1016/S0963-8695(98)00045-0 ↗
33. Bartoli I, Scalea F L D, Fateh M, et al. Modeling guided wave propagation with application to the long-range defect detection in railroad tracks. NDT E Int. 2005;38(5):325–334.10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.10.008 ↗
34. S LC, W LP, A RD, et al. Numerical verification of an efficient coupled SAFE-3D FE analysis for guided wave ultrasound excitation. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2018;149:45–56.10.1016/j.finel.2018.05.001 ↗
35. 10.1080/10589759.2025.249535510.1080/10589759.2025.2495355 ↗
36. Shen Y, Wang J, Q NIYI. Structural health monitoring of high-speed railways using ultrasonic guided waves. Struct Health Monit. 2017;2017:14198.
37. 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.01.05410.1016/j.jsv.2008.01.054 ↗
38. Bouteiller F, L GB, M PD, et al. Broken rail track detection using smart materials[C]. Nonintrusive Inspection, Struct Monit, Smart Syst Homel Secur. 2006;6178:65–75.