journal article·2026-07-01

Ultrasonic phased array imaging method for shallow surface defects of rails based on Deconvolutional Delay-Multiply-and-Sum

Yi Zhang, Liming Li, Shubin Zheng, Yuhui Xing, Wenfa Zhu, Weiwei Qi, Guopeng Fan, Jichao Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

As an important component of railways, rails are prone to damage due to the stress exerted by train wheels and environmental factors. Shallow surface defects in rails pose a serious threat to train operational safety and present a major challenge in Ultrasonic Testing (UT). The boundary echo overlaps with the defect echo, hindering the extraction of defect signals from detection data. Therefore, this paper proposes a Phased Array Ultrasonic (PAU) imaging method based on Deconvolutional Delay-Multiply-and-Sum (DE-DMAS). In the preprocessing stage, a Wiener deconvolution-based ultrasonic echo processing method separates and extracts shallow surface defect echoes. In the beamforming stage, the Delay-Multiply-and-Sum (DMAS) algorithm reconstructs defect features by calculating time delays and multiplying signals to enhance spatial coherence and suppress incoherent noise and artefacts. Experiments show that DE-DMAS significantly improves resolution for shallow surface defects. Compared to the Total Focusing Method (TFM), DE-DMAS improves the Contrast Ratio (CR) and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) by up to 98% and 184.6%, respectively. This method offers a new approach for detecting shallow surface defects in rails.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai University of Engineering Science

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/23248378.2024.233736410.1080/23248378.2024.2337364 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11592210.1016/j.measurement.2024.115922 ↗
3. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.340273010.1109/JSEN.2024.3402730 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000059110.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000591 ↗
5. 10.1784/insi.2017.59.4.17610.1784/insi.2017.59.4.176 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10956810.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109568 ↗
7. 10.3390/coatings1211179010.3390/coatings12111790 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13040910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130409 ↗
9. 10.1109/TIM.2025.357983610.1109/TIM.2025.3579836 ↗
10. 10.1080/10589759.2024.238774210.1080/10589759.2024.2387742 ↗
11. 10.3390/app908162810.3390/app9081628 ↗
12. 10.1080/10589759.2025.249535510.1080/10589759.2025.2495355 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10921-021-00796-410.1007/s10921-021-00796-4 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10921-025-01165-110.1007/s10921-025-01165-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11657710.1016/j.measurement.2024.116577 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10626410.1016/j.ultras.2020.106264 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.02.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2019.02.005 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab03ba10.1088/1361-6501/ab03ba ↗
19. 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.302816610.1109/TUFFC.2020.3028166 ↗
20. N WY, W GCH, X WY, et al. Ultrasound image optimization method based on deconvolution. J Nanjing Univ (Nat Sci). 2023;59(2):247–255.
21. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.02810.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.028 ↗
22. 10.1109/TITS.2021.313500610.1109/TITS.2021.3135006 ↗
23. 10.1177/1475921725140558410.1177/14759217251405584 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11071-025-11101-710.1007/s11071-025-11101-7 ↗
25. 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.283178910.1109/TUFFC.2018.2831789 ↗
26. 10.1109/58.58518610.1109/58.585186 ↗
27. 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.255728110.1109/TUFFC.2016.2557281 ↗
28. 10.1109/TIM.2024.350004810.1109/TIM.2024.3500048 ↗
29. 10.30511/PCDP.2024.71922910.30511/PCDP.2024.719229 ↗
30. 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.306587610.1109/TUFFC.2021.3065876 ↗
31. 10.1109/INDUSCON.2016.787446210.1109/INDUSCON.2016.7874462 ↗
32. 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.170610.1109/TUFFC.2010.1706 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10688110.1016/j.ultras.2022.106881 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.11049310.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110493 ↗
35. P PL, Painchaud-April G, Le Duff A, et al. Minimum transmission events for fast ultrasonic TFM imaging: a comparative study. NDT E Int. 2022;128:102627.10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102627 ↗
36. 10.3390/app811211310.3390/app8112113 ↗
37. Guo H, W XH, Q ZG, et al. Pixel-based approach to delay multiply and sum beamforming in combination with Wiener filter for improving ultrasound image quality. Ultrasonics. 2023;128:106864.10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106864 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.06.01110.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.06.011 ↗
39. 10.1088/1361-6420/ab23da10.1088/1361-6420/ab23da ↗
40. Jensen JA. Simulation of advanced ultrasound systems using field II[C]//2004. In: 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821); Arlington, (VA), USA. IEEE; 2004. p. 636–639.
41. 10.1784/insi.2012.55.2.7810.1784/insi.2012.55.2.78 ↗