journal article·2026-07-01

A deep learning model for stress estimation from full time-domain ultrasonic signals

Guangcan Yang, Chunguang Xu, Wenzheng Zhao, Changhong Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Residual stress is a critical factor which influences the service life and structural integrity of many metallic components. To address the limitations of conventional ultrasonic stress measurement methods, this study proposes a uniaxial stress estimation approach based on a hybrid deep learning architecture using full time-domain ultrasonic waveforms. The proposed 1D CNN-TGA model integrates a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN), a temporal convolutional network (TCN), a gated recurrent unit (GRU) and an attention mechanism to capture both local waveform characteristics and long-range temporal dependencies. Ablation experiments demonstrate that the proposed 1D CNN-TGA hybrid model achieves high accuracy in ultrasonic stress estimation. Grad-CAM is used to visualise the temporal regions of the ultrasonic signal that contributed most to the model’s stress estimation. Grad-CAM visualisation reveals that the model mainly focuses on signal regions containing amplitude-energy variations and time-shift characteristics, providing physical interpretability for the learned features. Experimental results show that the model achieves high estimation accuracy for stress estimation with R2 = 0.9995, MAE = 1.3098 MPa and RMSE = 1.5157 MPa. Compared with traditional time-of-flight (TOF) methods, the proposed approach demonstrates improved robustness and generalisation for ultrasonic stress estimation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Flow Measurement and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Institute of Technology

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/S11340-020-00679-110.1007/S11340-020-00679-1 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12666-022-02540-610.1007/s12666-022-02540-6 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1322519010.3390/ma13225190 ↗
4. 10.3390/qubs203001510.3390/qubs2030015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.007 ↗
6. 10.1186/s10033-020-0431-x10.1186/s10033-020-0431-x ↗
7. 10.1007/s11340-022-00879-x10.1007/s11340-022-00879-x ↗
8. 10.1201/b1117310.1201/b11173 ↗
9. Bray DE, Stanley RK. Nondestructive evaluation: a tool in design, manufacturing and service. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2018.10.1201/9781498711050 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10635910.1016/j.ultras.2021.106359 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.19010.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.190 ↗
12. 10.3390/app1119930610.3390/app11199306 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.02210.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.022 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10331810.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103318 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10315710.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103157 ↗
16. 10.3390/s2514437110.3390/s25144371 ↗
17. 10.1121/1.492872010.1121/1.4928720 ↗
18. 10.1121/1.472960010.1121/1.4729600 ↗
19. 10.1121/1.494125310.1121/1.4941253 ↗
20. 10.1121/1.513500410.1121/1.5135004 ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90021-U10.1016/0022-5096(90)90021-U ↗
22. 10.3390/ma904022310.3390/ma9040223 ↗
23. 10.1177/147592171774695210.1177/1475921717746952 ↗
24. 10.3901/CJME.2015.1023.12610.3901/CJME.2015.1023.126 ↗
25. 10.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.202206020110.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.2022060201 ↗
26. 10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.2725010.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27250 ↗
27. 10.3390/app13181040510.3390/app131810405 ↗
28. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10532810.1016/j.autcon.2024.105328 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10441210.1016/j.autcon.2022.104412 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11086810.1016/j.measurement.2022.110868 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10700510.1016/j.ultras.2023.107005 ↗
33. 10.3390/s2411358010.3390/s24113580 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11177410.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111774 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11340-021-00787-610.1007/s11340-021-00787-6 ↗
36. 10.3390/s2404120410.3390/s24041204 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.09110.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00500-020-04954-010.1007/s00500-020-04954-0 ↗
39. Dey R, Salem FM. Gate-variants of gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS); Boston, MA, USA. 2017. p. 1597–1600. doi: 10.1109/MWSCAS.2017.8053243
40. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12748410.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127484 ↗
41. 10.1109/TBME.2015.246858910.1109/TBME.2015.2468589 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00521-016-2401-x10.1007/s00521-016-2401-x ↗
43. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI; Savannah, GA, USA. 2016. Vol. 16. p. 265–283. doi: 10.5555/3026877.3026899
44. 10.7717/peerj-cs.62310.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
45. 10.3390/math1024464910.3390/math10244649 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11373810.1016/j.jobe.2025.113738 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00521-024-10405-w10.1007/s00521-024-10405-w ↗
48. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.10985310.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109853 ↗
49. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015); San Diego, CA, USA. 2015. p. 1–13. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980
50. 10.47738/jads.v5i3.31210.47738/jads.v5i3.312 ↗
51. Smith LN. Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV); Santa Rosa, CA, USA. 2017. p. 464–472. doi: 10.1109/WACV.2017.58
52. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11663810.1016/j.measurement.2024.116638 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10316910.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103169 ↗
54. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, et al. Grad-cam: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); Venice, Italy. 2017. p. 618–626. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74