journal article·2026-07-01

Physics-informed deep learning with a Softmin-Fermat time-of-flight loss for ultrasonic inspection of anisotropic welds

Hyunjun Kim, Ilhyun Yoo, Young Lae Kim, Dong Ryul Kwak, Ik Keun Park, Dongchan Kang

Publisher page

Abstract

Ultrasonic imaging of austenitic welds is degraded by spatially varying anisotropy, which distorts travel times and limits isotropic delay-law focusing. This simulation-based study proposes a weld-specific physics-informed deep learning framework for estimating effective weld-orientation maps from full matrix capture (FMC) data using a differentiable Softmin-Fermat time-of-flight (SF-ToF) loss. Predicted orientations are converted into rotated stiffness tensors and anisotropic slowness maps, and discretized backwall round-trip paths are aggregated through a Softmin approximation of Fermat’s principle to impose delay-consistency during training. The framework was evaluated in a CIVA-MINA multipass austenitic weld simulation, including a held-out welding-procedure shift, using ResUNet, CRNN, and ConvLSTM. Across architectures, SF-ToF regularization reduced orientation tail errors and threshold-exceeding error rates relative to matched data-driven baselines. For ConvLSTM, the selected λ = 5 × 10^4 reduced held-out RMSE from 10.50° to 8.00°, P99 from 47.4° to 29.9°, and PVR from 2.32% to 1.69%. Representative ray-bending TFM and 15-case localization ablations showed that SF-ToF-DL improved focusing consistency relative to isotropic and baseline-DL reconstructions, moving results toward the ground-truth anisotropy reference. These findings support differentiable Fermat-type regularization as a simulation-validated constraint for anisotropic weld inspection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Seoul National University of Science and Technology

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co

Funding

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Sullivan EJ, Anderson MT. Evaluation on the feasibility of using ultrasonic testing of reactor pressure vessel welds for assessing flaw density/distribution per 10 CFR 50.61a, alternate fracture toughness requirements for protection against pressurized thermal shock. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2014, PNNL-19666.
2. Anderson MT, Diaz AA, Cinson AD, et al. An assessment of ultrasonic techniques for far-side examinations of austenitic stainless steel piping welds, NUREG/CR–7113. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2011, PNNL-19353.
3. Harrison J, Jacob R, Prowant M, et al. Evaluating flaw detectability under limited-coverage conditions, PNNL-34367. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2023.
4. 10.3390/s2101024210.3390/s21010242 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.00510.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.005 ↗
6. Jacob RE, Prowant MS, Hutchinson CA, et al. Modeling and simulation of austenitic welds and coarse-grained specimens, PNNL-29899. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2020.
7. Jacob RE, Diaz AA. Ultrasonic modeling and simulation for nuclear nondestructive evaluation, PNNL-33732. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2023.
8. Liu Q, Wirdelius H. Model of ultrasonic ray paths in an anisotropic weld based on ray method. In: Proc. 16th World Conf. on NDT; Montreal, Canada; 2004. p. 1–8.
9. 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.01210.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.005 ↗
11. 10.3390/s2515455010.3390/s25154550 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10232710.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102327 ↗
13. Sullivan EJ. Summary of literature search of relief requests on ASME code, Section XI, volumetric examination coverage requirements for piping butt welds, PNNL-26157. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2017.
14. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.013 ↗
15. 10.3390/machines1010083910.3390/machines10100839 ↗
16. 10.1098/rspa.2023.023610.1098/rspa.2023.0236 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11416910.1016/j.measurement.2024.114169 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00024-310.1016/S0308-0161(03)00024-3 ↗
19. 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.00701810.1109/TUFFC.2015.007018 ↗
20. Hudgell RJ Gray BS. The ultrasonic inspection of austenitic materials: state of the art report. Northern Division: United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority; 1985.
21. 10.1007/s00521-021-06670-810.1007/s00521-021-06670-8 ↗
22. 10.3390/app1202053210.3390/app12020532 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cma.2026.11889910.1016/j.cma.2026.118899 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10270310.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102703 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2026.11222110.1016/j.engfracmech.2026.112221 ↗
26. Cao H, Mao Y, Sha L, et al. Physics-regulated deep reinforcement learning: invariant embeddings. arXiv Prepr arXiv: 2305.16614, 2024.
27. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.11249710.1016/j.optlastec.2025.112497 ↗
28. 10.1145/3355089.335652210.1145/3355089.3356522 ↗
29. Eertmans J, Jacques L, Oestges C. Fully differentiable ray tracing via discontinuity smoothing for radio network optimization. In: 2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); Glasgow, (UK). IEEE; 2024. p. 1–5.
30. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.04.00510.1016/j.ultras.2006.04.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/0165-2125(81)90026-310.1016/0165-2125(81)90026-3 ↗
32. Crampin S, Kirkwood SC. Velocity variations in systems of anisotropic symmetry. J Geophysics. 1981;49:35–42.
33. 10.1088/1742-2132/2/1/00810.1088/1742-2132/2/1/008 ↗
34. 10.1093/imanum/draa03810.1093/imanum/draa038 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.06410.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.064 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10477010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104770 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.28410.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.284 ↗
38. 10.1016/0378-4363(85)90076-210.1016/0378-4363(85)90076-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.01310.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.013 ↗
40. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.264637110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2646371 ↗
41. 10.5555/2969239.296932910.5555/2969239.2969329 ↗
42. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.112810.1109/TUFFC.2009.1128 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.00610.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.006 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598-018-23776-710.1038/s41598-018-23776-7 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.005 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.10946110.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109461 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.00110.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.001 ↗
48. 10.1016/0041-624X(87)90021-710.1016/0041-624X(87)90021-7 ↗