Physics-informed deep learning with a Softmin-Fermat time-of-flight loss for ultrasonic inspection of anisotropic welds
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrasonic imaging of austenitic welds is degraded by spatially varying anisotropy, which distorts travel times and limits isotropic delay-law focusing. This simulation-based study proposes a weld-specific physics-informed deep learning framework for estimating effective weld-orientation maps from full matrix capture (FMC) data using a differentiable Softmin-Fermat time-of-flight (SF-ToF) loss. Predicted orientations are converted into rotated stiffness tensors and anisotropic slowness maps, and discretized backwall round-trip paths are aggregated through a Softmin approximation of Fermat’s principle to impose delay-consistency during training. The framework was evaluated in a CIVA-MINA multipass austenitic weld simulation, including a held-out welding-procedure shift, using ResUNet, CRNN, and ConvLSTM. Across architectures, SF-ToF regularization reduced orientation tail errors and threshold-exceeding error rates relative to matched data-driven baselines. For ConvLSTM, the selected λ = 5 × 10^4 reduced held-out RMSE from 10.50° to 8.00°, P99 from 47.4° to 29.9°, and PVR from 2.32% to 1.69%. Representative ray-bending TFM and 15-case localization ablations showed that SF-ToF-DL improved focusing consistency relative to isotropic and baseline-DL reconstructions, moving results toward the ground-truth anisotropy reference. These findings support differentiable Fermat-type regularization as a simulation-validated constraint for anisotropic weld inspection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Seoul National University of Science and Technology
Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co
Funding
Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Sullivan EJ, Anderson MT. Evaluation on the feasibility of using ultrasonic testing of reactor pressure vessel welds for assessing flaw density/distribution per 10 CFR 50.61a, alternate fracture toughness requirements for protection against pressurized thermal shock. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2014, PNNL-19666.
2. Anderson MT, Diaz AA, Cinson AD, et al. An assessment of ultrasonic techniques for far-side examinations of austenitic stainless steel piping welds, NUREG/CR–7113. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2011, PNNL-19353.
3. Harrison J, Jacob R, Prowant M, et al. Evaluating flaw detectability under limited-coverage conditions, PNNL-34367. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2023.
4. 10.3390/s2101024210.3390/s21010242 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.00510.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.005 ↗
6. Jacob RE, Prowant MS, Hutchinson CA, et al. Modeling and simulation of austenitic welds and coarse-grained specimens, PNNL-29899. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2020.
7. Jacob RE, Diaz AA. Ultrasonic modeling and simulation for nuclear nondestructive evaluation, PNNL-33732. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2023.
8. Liu Q, Wirdelius H. Model of ultrasonic ray paths in an anisotropic weld based on ray method. In: Proc. 16th World Conf. on NDT; Montreal, Canada; 2004. p. 1–8.
9. 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.01210.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.005 ↗
11. 10.3390/s2515455010.3390/s25154550 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10232710.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102327 ↗
13. Sullivan EJ. Summary of literature search of relief requests on ASME code, Section XI, volumetric examination coverage requirements for piping butt welds, PNNL-26157. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2017.
14. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.013 ↗
15. 10.3390/machines1010083910.3390/machines10100839 ↗
16. 10.1098/rspa.2023.023610.1098/rspa.2023.0236 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11416910.1016/j.measurement.2024.114169 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00024-310.1016/S0308-0161(03)00024-3 ↗
19. 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.00701810.1109/TUFFC.2015.007018 ↗
20. Hudgell RJ Gray BS. The ultrasonic inspection of austenitic materials: state of the art report. Northern Division: United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority; 1985.
21. 10.1007/s00521-021-06670-810.1007/s00521-021-06670-8 ↗
22. 10.3390/app1202053210.3390/app12020532 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cma.2026.11889910.1016/j.cma.2026.118899 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10270310.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102703 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2026.11222110.1016/j.engfracmech.2026.112221 ↗
26. Cao H, Mao Y, Sha L, et al. Physics-regulated deep reinforcement learning: invariant embeddings. arXiv Prepr arXiv: 2305.16614, 2024.
27. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.11249710.1016/j.optlastec.2025.112497 ↗
28. 10.1145/3355089.335652210.1145/3355089.3356522 ↗
29. Eertmans J, Jacques L, Oestges C. Fully differentiable ray tracing via discontinuity smoothing for radio network optimization. In: 2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); Glasgow, (UK). IEEE; 2024. p. 1–5.
30. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.04.00510.1016/j.ultras.2006.04.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/0165-2125(81)90026-310.1016/0165-2125(81)90026-3 ↗
32. Crampin S, Kirkwood SC. Velocity variations in systems of anisotropic symmetry. J Geophysics. 1981;49:35–42.
33. 10.1088/1742-2132/2/1/00810.1088/1742-2132/2/1/008 ↗
34. 10.1093/imanum/draa03810.1093/imanum/draa038 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.06410.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.064 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10477010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104770 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.28410.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.284 ↗
38. 10.1016/0378-4363(85)90076-210.1016/0378-4363(85)90076-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.01310.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.013 ↗
40. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.264637110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2646371 ↗
41. 10.5555/2969239.296932910.5555/2969239.2969329 ↗
42. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.112810.1109/TUFFC.2009.1128 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.00610.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.006 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598-018-23776-710.1038/s41598-018-23776-7 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.005 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.10946110.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109461 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.00110.1016/j.ultras.2012.08.001 ↗
48. 10.1016/0041-624X(87)90021-710.1016/0041-624X(87)90021-7 ↗