Enhancing crack segmentation accuracy in varied conditions using least-squares GAN and Pix2Pix
Source abstract
Abstract
The detection and assessment of damage in civil infrastructure, particularly crack formation, are critical for early damage identification and effective maintenance planning. This paper investigates crack segmentation under varying environmental conditions using Pix2Pix-CrackNet, a deep learning-based neural network. The Pix2Pix-CrackNet model was trained on 6903 image pairs and validated using 1695 image pairs. Several strategies were implemented to improve crack segmentation accuracy, including the integration of features from the least squares generative adversarial network (LSGAN) and Pix2Pix, as well as optimisation of discriminator training relative to generator training through the use of a threshold value. To validate the performance of Pix2Pix-CrackNet, two established segmentation networks, namely U-Net and U-Net++, were also trained and evaluated using the same dataset. The performance of these models was then compared with that of Pix2Pix-CrackNet. Based on the evaluation of the segmentation models using Intersection over Union (IoU), precision, recall and F1-score metrics, Pix2Pix-CrackNet demonstrated superior performance compared with U-Net and U-Net++ on the test dataset. It achieved IoU, precision, recall and F1-score values of 72%, 87%, 53% and 66%, respectively, confirming its effectiveness and stronger generalisation capability for crack segmentation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Tehran
Isfahan University of Technology
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.1999.tb01320.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.1999.tb01320.x ↗
2. 10.1007/s13349-011-0015-710.1007/s13349-011-0015-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.05610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.056 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.01210.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00065-810.1016/S0963-8695(02)00065-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.03.01110.1016/j.ndteint.2004.03.011 ↗
7. Naik TR, Malhotra VM, Popovics JS. The ultrasonic pulse velocity method. In: Malhotra VM, Carino NJ, editors. Handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003. p. 8-1–8–19.
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.011 ↗
10. Sokavcic A. Application of infrared thermography to the non-destructive testing of concrete structures [PhD thesis]. Gradjevinski fakultet Sveuvcilivste u Zagrebu; 2010.
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.010 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11340-007-9120-210.1007/s11340-007-9120-2 ↗
13. 10.1111/0031-868X.0019810.1111/0031-868X.00198 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2003)17:4(255)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2003)17:4(255) ↗
15. 10.1007/s00138-009-0244-510.1007/s00138-009-0244-5 ↗
16. 10.1111/mice.1214110.1111/mice.12141 ↗
17. 10.1109/42.81127910.1109/42.811279 ↗
18. Ryu HK. A new corner detection method of gray-level image using Hessian matrix. In: Proceedings of the International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST); Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. IEEE; 2007. p. 314–317.
19. 10.3390/s11100962810.3390/s111009628 ↗
20. 10.1109/TITS.2016.255224810.1109/TITS.2016.2552248 ↗
21. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
22. 10.1109/TIE.2017.276484410.1109/TIE.2017.2764844 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.011 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
25. Simard PY, Steinkraus D, Platt JC. Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. In: Marinai S, Dengel A, editors. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 2003. p. 958–963.
26. Zhang L. Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); Phoenix, Arizona, USA. IEEE; 2016. p. 3708–3712.
27. Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, et al. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); Columbus, OH, USA. IEEE Computer Society; 2014. p. 580–587.
28. Girshick R. Fast R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); Santiago, Chile. IEEE Computer Society; 2015. p. 1440–1448.
29. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, et al. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015;28:91–99.
30. 10.1111/mice.1233410.1111/mice.12334 ↗
31. 10.1111/mice.1229710.1111/mice.12297 ↗
32. 10.1002/stc.228610.1002/stc.2286 ↗
33. Li H Zhao R Wang X. Highly efficient forward and backward propagation of convolutional neural networks for pixelwise classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.4526 2014.
34. Giusti A, Cireşan DC, Masci J, et al. Fast image scanning with deep max-pooling convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); Melbourne, Australia. IEEE; 2013. p. 4034–4038.
35. 10.1111/mice.1241210.1111/mice.12412 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.02810.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.028 ↗
37. 10.1111/mice.1243310.1111/mice.12433 ↗
38. 10.1177/136943321983629210.1177/1369433219836292 ↗
39. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, et al., editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2015). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 9351. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 234–241.
40. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.00510.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.005 ↗
41. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.308971810.1109/JSEN.2021.3089718 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compind.2022.10369810.1016/j.compind.2022.103698 ↗
43. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2014;27.
44. 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10126710.1016/j.rineng.2023.101267 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10413910.1016/j.autcon.2022.104139 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11576910.1016/j.measurement.2024.115769 ↗
47. Middha L. Crack segmentation dataset. 2020; Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/lakshaymiddha/crack-segmentation-dataset/data
48. Zhou Z, Tajbakhsh N, Liang J. Unet++: a nested U-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In: Stoyanov D, Taylor Z, Carneiro G, et al., editors. Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support. DLMIA 2018, ML-CDS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11045. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 3–11.