A defect-guided robotic in-process repair framework for carbon fibre composite layup defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Layup defects such as bubbles, wrinkles, and delamination may compromise interlaminar bonding and forming quality during robotic forming of carbon fibre composites. To improve the adaptability of in-situ repair, this study proposes a defect-guided robotic continuous repair framework integrating multimodal defect recognition, surface-constrained path planning, and defect-dependent force – velocity regulation. Thermographic images, defect feature maps, and STL-derived depth information are fused by a gated multimodal network to identify repairable defects, which are then mapped onto the mould surface for robot-executable trajectory generation. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves an average classification accuracy of 93.57%. The proposed path planning method reduces path length by 19.6–20.9% compared with the local shortest-path algorithm and by 69.3–73.1% compared with the empirical Z-shaped strategy. Repair experiments further demonstrate that adaptive force – velocity regulation improves defect reduction efficiency compared with constant-parameter repair. The prosthetic mould experiment verifies the adaptability of the framework to multi-curvature composite mould surfaces, indicating its potential for robotic in-process repair of composite layup defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Wuhan University
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Science and Technology Program of Wuhan City
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Gebrehiwet L, Abate E, Negussie Y, et al. Application of composite materials in aerospace & automotive industry. Int J Adv Eng Manag (IJAEM). 2023;5(3):697–723.
2. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.02610.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.026 ↗
3. 10.3390/jcs501002810.3390/jcs5010028 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1308132310.3390/polym13081323 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11762410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117624 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.10027610.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100276 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1621298610.3390/polym16212986 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1813314610.3390/ma18133146 ↗
9. 10.1177/1475921723118458910.1177/14759217231184589 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac545510.1088/1361-665X/ac5455 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.10598810.1016/j.ultras.2019.105988 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10921-020-00737-710.1007/s10921-020-00737-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11221210.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112212 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10973-024-13365-410.1007/s10973-024-13365-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.10336810.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103368 ↗
16. Wippo V, Hirt S, Dittmar H, et al. Laser based repair of CFRP for the aerospace industry[C]//High-power laser materials processing: applications, diagnostics, and systems IX. SPIE. 2020;11273:96–102.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10940310.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109403 ↗
18. Gray I, Padiyar MJ, Petrunin I, et al. A novel approach for the autonomous inspection and repair of aircraft composite structures. In: Watkins S, Mohamed A, editors. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Composite Materials; 2018 Jun 24–28; Athens, Greece; 2018. p. 24–28.
19. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11629810.1016/j.measurement.2024.116298 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11190210.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111902 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.11347310.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113473 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10348310.1016/j.addma.2023.103483 ↗
23. E TM, Zolotas A, P AN, et al. Multi-modal analysis of barely visible impact damage in carbon fibre composites through the fusion of pulsed thermography and phased array ultrasonic testing. Quant Infrared Thermogr J. 2026;23(2):119–147.10.1080/17686733.2025.2535166 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00170-022-09933-310.1007/s00170-022-09933-3 ↗
25. 10.1109/TIM.2025.355246610.1109/TIM.2025.3552466 ↗
26. 10.3390/su1505465610.3390/su15054656 ↗
27. 10.1108/RPJ-03-2024-011010.1108/RPJ-03-2024-0110 ↗
28. 10.1177/0021998325134555910.1177/00219983251345559 ↗
29. 10.1021/ma010858o10.1021/ma010858o ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11266310.1016/j.tws.2024.112663 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.08.01410.1016/j.coco.2019.08.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10690310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106903 ↗
33. Liu L, Ning H, Wu X, et al. Enhancing connection strength and repair efficiency in stainless steel− CFRP joints via autonomous temperature-regulated vitrimer composite films. Composites part a. Appl Sci Manuf. 2025;194:108935.10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108935 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.rcim.2024.10288210.1016/j.rcim.2024.102882 ↗
35. 10.3390/su1712557410.3390/su17125574 ↗
36. 10.3390/s2102039510.3390/s21020395 ↗
37. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245759310.1080/10589759.2025.2457593 ↗
38. Furqan M, Adha RM, Armansyah A. Determination of the closest path using the greedy algorithm. IJISTECH (Int J Inf System Technol). 2024;7(5):333–340.