Waveform signal-driven structural damage detection via a multiscale residual convolutional neural network with varifocal receptive field
Source abstract
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and residual networks have been widely adopted for structural damage detection (SDD). However, a key limitation of these models is their fixed receptive fields, which are constrained by kernel dimensions. While a common strategy to enlarge the receptive field is to increase kernel size, this approach leads to a significant growth in parameters and raises the risk of overfitting. To overcome this fundamental constraint, we propose a novel multiscale residual CNN architecture with adaptive varifocal receptive fields for damage detection. The core of our framework involves replacing standard residual blocks with varifocal modules that utilise bilinear interpolation, complemented by parallel multi-scale convolution branches to enrich feature diversity and discriminative power. Experimental cases are implemented on the flexible airship capsule and the building structure, and results demonstrate our method’s superiority over existing approaches, achieving high detection accuracies of 95.51% and 99.87%, respectively. Furthermore, noise robustness and uncertainty analyses confirm the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method for practical SDD applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
Shenzhen Research Institute of China University of Geosciences
Jimei University
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province · Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.11016510.1016/j.istruc.2025.110165 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2025.250842510.1080/10589759.2025.2508425 ↗
3. 10.1007/s40435-024-01578-210.1007/s40435-024-01578-2 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2024.244081610.1080/10589759.2024.2440816 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.01310.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.013 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.00210.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11556510.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115565 ↗
8. 10.1108/IJSI-07-2018-003710.1108/IJSI-07-2018-0037 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.08110.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.081 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.11062110.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110621 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00323-710.1016/S0045-7949(03)00323-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ress.2022.10902510.1016/j.ress.2022.109025 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12205-017-1518-510.1007/s12205-017-1518-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.01910.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.019 ↗
15. 10.1109/TIM.2020.304879210.1109/TIM.2020.3048792 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compind.2019.10313210.1016/j.compind.2019.103132 ↗
17. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.292367710.1109/JSEN.2019.2923677 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-025-14029-510.1038/s41598-025-14029-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.12139910.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121399 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.10850710.1016/j.asoc.2022.108507 ↗
21. 10.1109/TIM.2019.295343610.1109/TIM.2019.2953436 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.03410.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.034 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.10.02310.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.10.023 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.aei.2022.10155410.1016/j.aei.2022.101554 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11760-025-04354-710.1007/s11760-025-04354-7 ↗
26. 10.1007/s42417-023-01116-y10.1007/s42417-023-01116-y ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10320510.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103205 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11042-025-20729-x10.1007/s11042-025-20729-x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10532810.1016/j.autcon.2024.105328 ↗
30. 10.1177/147592172093405110.1177/1475921720934051 ↗
31. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
32. 10.1109/TGRS.2025.359829010.1109/TGRS.2025.3598290 ↗
33. 10.1109/TMECH.2026.366638510.1109/TMECH.2026.3666385 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.aej.2025.12.03010.1016/j.aej.2025.12.030 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.06910.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.069 ↗
36. 10.3390/s1912275010.3390/s19122750 ↗
37. 10.1007/s13349-023-00715-310.1007/s13349-023-00715-3 ↗
38. Baral A, Singh V, Lath A. Evaluating the performance of ResNet-50 and GoogleNet for damage detection and classification. In: Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems (ICSES); Kaski, Nepal; 2024. p. 1721–1726.10.1109/ICSES63445.2024.10763274 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11870310.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118703 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10316210.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103162 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.13109210.1016/j.neucom.2025.131092 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.10565610.1016/j.engappai.2022.105656 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.06.03510.1016/j.isatra.2022.06.035 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.02210.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.022 ↗
45. 10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_3810.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 ↗
46. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x ↗
47. Glorot X, Bengio Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. J Mach Learn Res. 2010;9:249–256.
48. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2015. p. 1026–1034.
49. 10.1109/TIE.2017.277477710.1109/TIE.2017.2774777 ↗
50. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad1d4a10.1088/1361-6501/ad1d4a ↗
51. 10.1016/j.aei.2023.10224610.1016/j.aei.2023.102246 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.00410.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.004 ↗
53. 10.1109/TII.2021.310201710.1109/TII.2021.3102017 ↗
54. 10.3390/s1923530010.3390/s19235300 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10489-020-02092-610.1007/s10489-020-02092-6 ↗
56. 10.1088/1361-6501/adb76f10.1088/1361-6501/adb76f ↗
57. Wang A, Chen H, Lin Z, et al. Repvit: revisiting mobile CNN from vit perspective. In: Proc IEEE/CVF Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR); 2024. p. 15909–15920.
58. Figueiredo E Park G Figueiras J et al. Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets. Technical report LA-14393. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Los Alamos; 2009.10.2172/961604 ↗
59. Li G, Wu J, Deng C, et al. Parallel multi-fusion convolutional neural networks with mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery in noise environments. ISA T. 2022;128:545–555.10.1016/j.isatra.2021.10.023 ↗
60. 10.1007/s00769-008-0475-610.1007/s00769-008-0475-6 ↗
61. 10.3390/app1017576510.3390/app10175765 ↗