journal article·2026-05-17

Graph neural networks for spatial-temporal analysis of defect propagation in layer-based manufacturing processes

Muhammad Shafiq, Hashim Farooq, Srigitha. S. Nath, T Srinivasulu, R. Vinoth Kumar, S. Lakshmi Narayanan

Publisher page

Abstract

Layer-based quality control in additive manufacturing is challenging due to the spatio-temporal complexity of defect development and propagation across build layers. Most deep learning approaches perform layer-independent analysis, limiting their ability to predict defect evolution. This work proposes a CNN Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Network (CNN-STGNN) framework for defect recognition, severity prediction, and early warning in layer-by-layer manufacturing. A one-dimensional CNN first encodes multimodal in-situ signals—including process parameters, thermal features, and acoustic descriptors—into spatial embeddings. These embeddings construct a spatio-temporal graph where nodes represent layer-region pairs and edges capture intra-layer spatial adjacency and inter-layer temporal continuity. A graph attention mechanism identifies critical layers and dominant fault propagation paths. Evaluated on 1,000 samples spanning 100 layers and five spatial regions, CNN-STGNN achieves 85.9% defect classification accuracy and a 0.84 macro F1-score, a 13.1% improvement over CNN-only baselines. Severity estimation yields an RMSE of 0.061 and R² of 0.89. Temporal analysis demonstrates detection of defects up to 25 layers ahead with over 74% accuracy and below 19% false alarm rate. Graph attention visualizations further provide interpretable identification of high-risk layers and propagation pathways, enabling proactive quality control in industrial additive manufacturing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Neural Networks and Applications · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shandong Xiehe University

Baba Guru Nanak University

Saveetha Engineering College

Aditya University

Rajalakshmi Engineering College

Gojan School of Business and Technology

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Wohlers T. Additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry. Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins, Co. 2013;6:269–375.
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
4. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f ↗
5. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.06.01610.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.06.016 ↗
6. 10.1109/LRA.2018.285179210.1109/LRA.2018.2851792 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.00510.1016/j.addma.2018.04.005 ↗
8. Malhotra P, Vig L, Shroff G, et al. Long short term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series. In: Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN); Bruges, Belgium; 2015 Apr; Vol89. p. 89–94.
9. 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.297838610.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compind.2023.10391210.1016/j.compind.2023.103912 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11749510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117495 ↗
12. Larsen S Hooper PA. In-situ anomaly detection in additive manufacturing with graph neural networks. 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02695.
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11111510.1016/j.matdes.2022.111115 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.11610.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.116 ↗
15. 10.3390/app1002054510.3390/app10020545 ↗
16. 10.3390/s2413439710.3390/s24134397 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10403510.1016/j.addma.2024.104035 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11755010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117550 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.03.00610.1016/j.jmsy.2023.03.006 ↗
20. 10.3390/met1508084010.3390/met15080840 ↗
21. Kadhiravan D. Spatio-temporal defect prediction in layer-based manufacturing [Dataset]. GitHub; 2024. Available from: https://github.com/karankadhir86/Spatio-Temporal-Defect-Prediction-in-Layer-Based-Manufacturing-