journal article·2026-05-11Open access

Characterisation of rolling contact fatigue cracks using Rayleigh wave scatter field aided by machine learning

Subal Sharma, Yoganandh Madhuranthakam, Alex Vu, Firas A. Khasawneh, Anish Poudel, Yiming Deng, Sunil. K. Chakrapani

Abstract

This work explores a novel method of characterising an array of cracks using the scatter field of the interacting Rayleigh waves. Numerically simulated line-scans with a stationary transmitter and moving receiver were used to extract scatter field data from defective and intact samples, where the latter provides the baseline response. To mimic experimental data collection, white Gaussian noise was added to create ensembles with different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The crack array was characterised using two parameters: (i) depth of cracks (200−500 µm) and (ii) number of cracks (3−7). The scatter field resulting from different combinations of these parameters was further featurized using the loss of correlation (Locor). The features were trained using different machine learning regression models, which were evaluated for estimating the depth and the number of cracks in an array. A multi-output decision tree regressor using the scatter field features had the best accuracy of >90%, compared to using the traditional transmission coefficient as a feature, which only had an accuracy of 50%. Finally, a feature-importance study revealed that the local resonances in the crack array may contribute to the increased sensitivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Michigan State University

MxV Rail

Funding

Association of American Railroads

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Poudel A, Witte M. Measuring rolling contact damage in rails using EMFi. AAR/MxV Rail Technol Dig. 2018:TD18–016. Available from: https://aar.com/TD-eLibrary
2. Poudel A, Witte M, Gies P, et al. Rolling contact damage characterization on railroad rails using electromagnetic field imaging (EMFI). Mater Eval. 2019;77(7):951–965.
3. Tournay HM. Overview of rolling contact fatigue prediction models. Aar/MxV rail technology digest. 2010. p. TD-10–040. Available from: https://aar.com/TD-eLibrar
4. 10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/01209810.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012098 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_28710.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_287 ↗
6. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00693.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00693.x ↗
7. Magel EE. Rolling contact fatigue: a comprehensive review. Washington (DC): United States Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Policy report: DOT/FRA/ORD-11/24; 2011.
8. 10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.06510.1016/j.wear.2004.03.065 ↗
9. Popovic´ Z, Radovic´ V, Lazarevic´ L, et al. Rail inspection of RCF defects. Metalurgija. 2013;52(4):537–540.
10. Heckel T, Thomas HM, Kreutzbruck M, et al. High speed non-destructive rail testing with advanced ultrasound and eddy-current testing techniques. In: NDTIP Proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic; 2009.
11. 10.1177/095440971665784810.1177/0954409716657848 ↗
12. 10.1177/0954409721102953410.1177/09544097211029534 ↗
13. 10.1109/TIM.2018.289005310.1109/TIM.2018.2890053 ↗
14. 10.1109/5.16866610.1109/5.168666 ↗
15. 10.3390/s2123793710.3390/s21237937 ↗
16. 10.1080/09349847.2023.218056010.1080/09349847.2023.2180560 ↗
17. 10.32548/RS.2022.01910.32548/RS.2022.019 ↗
18. Chakrapani S, Bond L, Edwards R. Rayleigh wave nondestructive evaluation for defect detection and material characterization. Vol. 17. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 2018. p. 266–282.
19. 10.1121/1.497368810.1121/1.4973688 ↗
20. Edwards RS, Holmes C, Fan Y, et al. Ultrasonic detection of surface-breaking railhead defects. Insight-Non-Destr Test Condit Monit. 2008;50(7):369–373.
21. Edwards RS, Dutton B, Rosli MH, et al. Non-contact ultrasonic characterization of angled surface defects. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics; 2010 July 18–23; San Diego, California, USA. 2011. Vol. 1335. p. 257–264.
22. 10.1080/10589759.2019.161181710.1080/10589759.2019.1611817 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.10.07110.1016/j.wear.2010.10.071 ↗
24. Poudel A, Witte M. Evaluation of in-motion echo-rail rcd measurement system. AAR/MxV Rail Technology digest. TD20-007. 2020. https://www.mxvrail.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/TD20-007.pdf
25. Poudel A Witte M. Validation of in-motion echo-rail system for rcd crack depth measurement. AAR/MxV rail technology digest. 2021. https://www.mxvrail.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/TD21-012.pdf.
26. 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.304584710.1109/TUFFC.2020.3045847 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10921-010-0074-410.1007/s10921-010-0074-4 ↗
28. 10.3390/app1210517510.3390/app12105175 ↗
29. 10.1080/09349847.2024.231976510.1080/09349847.2024.2319765 ↗
30. 10.1080/09349847.2021.193030510.1080/09349847.2021.1930305 ↗
31. 10.1080/09349847.2020.184737410.1080/09349847.2020.1847374 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10296910.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102969 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10322110.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103221 ↗
34. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.306294110.1109/JSEN.2021.3062941 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10288510.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102885 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.078 ↗
37. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/12/12500710.1088/0964-1726/18/12/125007 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/8/08501110.1088/0964-1726/18/8/085011 ↗
39. Auld BA. Acoustic fields and waves in solids. Vol. 1. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1973.
40. 10.1063/1.243580310.1063/1.2435803 ↗
41. 10.31274/etd-180810-518010.31274/etd-180810-5180 ↗
42. 10.1080/10589759.2024.230472010.1080/10589759.2024.2304720 ↗
43. 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1105:MRTANT]2.0.CO;210.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1105:MRTANT]2.0.CO;2 ↗
44. 10.1121/1.486968410.1121/1.4869684 ↗