Physics-guided deep learning-based domain-shift robust alignment network for bearing fault diagnosis
Source abstract
Abstract
Bearing fault diagnosis under varying severity and operating conditions remains a critical challenge for safe industrial deployment. Traditional domain adaptation methods often rely on large over-parameterised backbones or adversarial training, suffering from negative transfer and poor interpretability. This paper proposes DS-RAN, a lightweight physics-constrained domain-shift robust alignment network that achieves state-of-the-art cross-severity transfer. The core contribution is a theoretically grounded combination of a two-parameter affine physics-constrained adapter that explicitly models dominant fault progression effects (amplitude scaling and DC offset) and a spectral-normalised convolutional blocks ensuring Lipschitz-continuous feature extraction with a class-conditional maximum mean discrepancy for fine-grained distribution alignment. Extensive experiments on CWRU and the non-stationary University of Ottawa datasets demonstrate 99.6% accuracy on severe cross-severity tasks (0.007” → 0.021”) and 88.0% under extreme speed inversion. The proposed method outperformed ResNet-50, EfficientNet and other SOTA DA methods by 8–10% while being significantly smaller and lightweight. Rigorous ablation and statistical analysis confirm the indispensable roles of each component.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Umm Al-Qura University
University of Sargodha
University of Jeddah
Rabdan Academy
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Lu W, Liang B, Cheng Y, et al. Deep model based domain adaptation for fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2016. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7740016/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7740016/
2. 10.3390/s1702042510.3390/s17020425 ↗
3. Li X, Zhang W, Ding Q, et al. Multi-layer domain adaptation method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Signal Process. 2019;157:180–197. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165168418303967https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016516841830396710.1016/j.sigpro.2018.12.005 ↗
4. Liu ZH, Lu BL, Wei HL, et al. Deep adversarial domain adaptation model for bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2019. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8805261/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8805261/
5. 10.1155/2020/467670110.1155/2020/467670110.1155/2020/467670110.1155/2020/4676701 ↗
6. Li X, Zhang W. Deep learning-based partial domain adaptation method on intelligent machinery fault diagnostics. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2020. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9059018/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9059018/
7. Li X, Hu Y, Zheng J, et al. Central moment discrepancy based domain adaptation for intelligent bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing. 2021;429:12–24. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231220318579https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092523122031857910.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.063 ↗
8. Jin T, Yan C, Chen C, et al. New domain adaptation method in shallow and deep layers of the CNN for bearing fault diagnosis under different working conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2023;124(11–12):3701–3712. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-021-07385-9https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-021-07385-910.1007/s00170-021-07385-9 ↗
9. Zhong Z, Liu H, Mao W, et al. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis across operating conditions based on unsupervised domain adaptation. Lubricants. 2023;11(9):383. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/11/9/383https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/11/9/38310.3390/lubricants11090383 ↗
10. 10.1177/1475921725133051810.1177/14759217251330518 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41598-024-80743-110.1038/s41598-024-80743-110.1038/s41598-024-80743-110.1038/s41598-024-80743-1 ↗
12. Kang S, Sun Y, Li X, et al. Unsupervised fault diagnosis method for rolling bearings based on federated universal domain adaptation. Eng Appl Artif Intel. 2025;162:112518. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625025497https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095219762502549710.1016/j.engappai.2025.112518 ↗
13. Tang Z, Hou X, Huang X, et al. Domain adaptation for bearing fault diagnosis based on SimAM and adaptive weighting strategy. Sensors. 2024;24(13):4251. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/13/4251https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/13/425110.3390/s24134251 ↗
14. Wang S, Han W, Jian J, et al. A domain adaptation meta learning method with multilayer convolutional attention for cross-domain bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2025;25(8):14440–14452. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10927635/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10927635/
15. Ding Y, Jia M, Zhuang J, et al. Deep imbalanced domain adaptation for transfer learning fault diagnosis of bearings under multiple working conditions. Reliab Eng Sys Saf. 2023;230:108890. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022005075https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202200507510.1016/j.ress.2022.108890 ↗
16. 10.1007/s13369-024-09282-110.1007/s13369-024-09282-1 ↗
17. 10.1177/0954406225134994710.1177/09544062251349947 ↗
18. Bai G, Xing T, Sun W, et al. Unsupervised multiple-target domain adaptation for bearing fault diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif Intel. 2025;154:111063. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625010644https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095219762501064410.1016/j.engappai.2025.111063 ↗
19. 10.3390/sym1709143810.3390/sym17091438 ↗
20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.344490710.1109/ACCESS.2024.3444907 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.01810.1016/j.aej.2024.10.018 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.10463910.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104639 ↗
23. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.290510110.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905101 ↗
24. 10.1109/TIM.2020.304230010.1109/TIM.2020.3042300 ↗
25. 10.1109/TIM.2023.328266410.1109/TIM.2023.3282664 ↗
26. 10.1109/TCE.2025.363195410.1109/TCE.2025.3631954 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.11.00910.1016/j.jmsy.2023.11.009 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.12881410.1016/j.eswa.2025.128814 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.025545110.1063/5.0255451 ↗
30. 10.5555/2946645.294670410.5555/2946645.2946704 ↗
31. 10.5555/3326943.332709410.5555/3326943.3327094 ↗
32. 10.5555/3504035.350451710.5555/3504035.3504517 ↗
33. Zhang Y, Liu T, Long M, et al. Bridging theory and algorithm for domain adaptation. Proc Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML). 2019;97:7404–7413.
34. Chen X, Wang S, Long M, et al. Transferability vs. discriminability: batch spectral penalization for adversarial domain adaptation. Proc Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML). 2019;97:1081–1090.
35. 10.1016/0301-679X(84)90076-810.1016/0301-679X(84)90076-8 ↗
36. 10.1002/978047097766810.1002/9780470977668 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.00210.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.00210.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.00210.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.002 ↗
38. Huang H Baddour N. Bearing vibration data collected under time-varying rotational speed conditions. Dataset Mendeley Data V2 2019. cited 2025 Nov 28. Available https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/v43hmbwxpm/2