journal article·2026-01-05

Identification of welding defects from ultrasonic signals using an improved ACGAN and WOA-ShuffleNet V1

Yuan Chen, Xin Su, Hao Shen, Guangming Zhang, Hongwei Ma, Ming Dong, Wenbin Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

In the ultrasonic detection of weld defects, addressing issues such as small-sample multi-class imbalanced distribution of echo signals and lightweight requirements for classification models, a welding defect ultrasonic signal recognition method based on Gramian angular summation field (GASF), improved auxiliary classifier generative adversarial network (ACGAN), and WOA-ShuffleNet V1 is proposed. First, ACGAN is enhanced by integrating a frequency-aware module, latent space optimisation, and optimised loss functions to improve generated sample quality. Then, through comparative analysis of expansion ratios and the impact of generative models on classification results, the effectiveness of the improved ACGAN in augmenting multi-class imbalanced small-sample data is validated. Finally, the whale optimisation algorithm (WOA) is employed to optimise hyperparameters of ShuffleNet V1. Experimental results show that on the expanded data, the method maintains 90.75% recognition accuracy while reducing FLOPs, model size and number of parameters, thus achieving a balance between lightweighting and classification performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xi’an University of Science and Technology

Liverpool John Moores University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/2374068X.2021.190933210.1080/2374068X.2021.1909332 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10685410.1016/j.ultras.2022.106854 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.26810.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.268 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.06.09410.1016/j.neucom.2021.06.094 ↗
5. 10.1080/10589759.2024.241369010.1080/10589759.2024.2413690 ↗
6. 10.1080/10589759.2025.254837410.1080/10589759.2025.2548374 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242734810.1080/10589759.2024.2427348 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11224510.1016/j.measurement.2022.112245 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10921-024-01119-z10.1007/s10921-024-01119-z ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad061310.1088/1361-6501/ad0613 ↗
11. 10.3390/en1518669510.3390/en15186695 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compind.2019.07.00510.1016/j.compind.2019.07.005 ↗
13. 10.1080/10589759.2024.231926110.1080/10589759.2024.2319261 ↗
14. Zhang Y, Gan F, Chen X. Motif difference field: an effective image-based time series classification and applications in machine malfunction detection[c]. In: 2020 IEEE 4th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), Wuhan, China. IEEE. p. 3079–3083.
15. 10.3390/s2214539010.3390/s22145390 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242969110.1080/10589759.2024.2429691 ↗
17. Pawar P, Buktar R. Detection and classification of defects in ultrasonic testing using deep learning[c]. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Trends in Machine Learning, IoT, Smart Cities and Applications: ICMISC 2021, Hyderabad, India. Springer Singapore; 2022. p. 1–15.
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10221810.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102218 ↗
19. Liu J, Zhao Z, Fu M, et al. Active small sample learning based the pipe weld defect detection method. Chin J Sci Instrument. 2022;43(11):252–261.
20. Zhang R, Gao M, Fu L, et al. Weld defect detection based on adaptive fusion of multi-domain and multi-scale deep features. J Vibr Shock. 2023;42(17):294–305+313.
21. 10.1007/s10845-021-01849-110.1007/s10845-021-01849-1 ↗
22. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.300545010.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005450 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-025-89558-010.1038/s41598-025-89558-0 ↗
24. 10.3390/math1019367810.3390/math10193678 ↗
25. 10.1080/10589759.2024.238775710.1080/10589759.2024.2387757 ↗
26. Wang Z, Oates T. Imaging time-series to improve classification and imputation[J]. The 24th. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Buenos Aires, Argentina. AAAI Press, 2015. p. 3939–3945.
27. Odena A, Olah C, Shlens J. Conditional image synthesis with auxiliary classifier GANs[C]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09585; 2016.
28. Gu Z, Li W, Huo J, et al. Lofgan: fusing local representations for few-shot image generation[c]. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vol. 2021. p. 8463–8471.
29. Zhang X, Zhou X, Lin M, et al. Shufflenet: an extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices[c]. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2018. p. 6848–6856.
30. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗