journal article·2026-01-05

Application of modified complementary-coded excitation method in EMAT detection

Zenghua Liu, Jinjie Cheng, Xin Zhao, Yanhong Guo, Jinlong Li, Cunfu He

Publisher page

Abstract

Traditional binary complementary sequences generally depend on two encoding and decoding cycles to realize pulse compression, which tends to introduce detection errors and limit detection speed. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a single-coded excitation method based on the complementary A code, replacing the conventional dual excitation of A and B codes. The method was evaluated using a finite element model of a spiral coil electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) and thickness measurement experiments on ZG40Cr steel, with 16-bit Golay and 16-bit G-LFM signals employed as excitations. Simulations and experimental results demonstrated that the single-code excitation approach overcomes the drawbacks of dual excitation while maintaining a comparable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) gain. Moreover, the pulse compression performance of Tone-burst, 13-bit Barker, 16-bit Golay, 20-bit complementary, and combined coded signals were compared under varying EMAT lift-offs. The results indicated that the proposed method achieves effective decoding under various noise levels, with the 16-bit Golay code yielding the highest SNR. It was also observed that the combined coded signal reduces the main lobe width by approximately 50% compared to phase-coded signals.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements · Electron Spin Resonance Studies · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing University of Technology

Beijing Polytechnic University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China and the National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2023.222177010.1080/10589759.2023.2221770 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.00910.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10926710.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109267 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10629710.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106297 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10622710.1016/j.ultras.2020.106227 ↗
6. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.313012110.1109/JSEN.2021.3130121 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.10727110.1016/j.ultras.2024.107271 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2023.218050810.1080/10589759.2023.2180508 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.10749310.1016/j.ultras.2024.107493 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11305310.1016/j.sna.2021.113053 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10257210.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102572 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10290010.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102900 ↗
13. 10.1080/09349847.2016.126248510.1080/09349847.2016.1262485 ↗
14. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.334847710.1109/JSEN.2023.3348477 ↗
15. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.334232910.1109/JSEN.2023.3342329 ↗
16. 10.3233/JAE-20153110.3233/JAE-201531 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11166410.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111664 ↗
18. 10.3390/s2407216710.3390/s24072167 ↗
19. Pearson C, Pearson N, Cegla F. Coded excitation using TOP-CS sequences for multi-channel low-power ultrasonics. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2024;213:111339.10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111339 ↗
20. Isla J, Cegla F. The use of binary quantization for the acquisition of low SNR ultrasonic signals: a study of the input dynamic range. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr. 2016;63(9):1474–1482.10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2571843 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.03.00110.1016/j.ultras.2017.03.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10328210.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103282 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10318010.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103180 ↗
24. 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.67010.1109/TUFFC.2008.670 ↗
25. 10.1088/1402-4896/ad0c8f10.1088/1402-4896/ad0c8f ↗
26. 10.1080/10589759.2022.206666410.1080/10589759.2022.2066664 ↗
27. 10.1080/10589759.2014.94184010.1080/10589759.2014.941840 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10921-017-0425-510.1007/s10921-017-0425-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10716410.1016/j.ultras.2023.107164 ↗
30. Shen P, Wu Y, Luo Z, et al. Advanced orthogonal frequency and phase modulated waveform for ultrasonic phased array TFM detection in CFRP composites. IEEE T Instrum Meas. 2024;73:4504410.10.1109/TIM.2024.3378307 ↗
31. 10.3390/app1202077710.3390/app12020777 ↗
32. Fu J, Wei G, Huang Q, et al. Barker coded excitation with linear frequency modulated carrier for ultrasonic imaging. Biomed Signal Proces. 2024;13:306–312.10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.004 ↗
33. 10.1080/10589759.2017.137171610.1080/10589759.2017.1371716 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.06.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.06.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.08.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2011.08.007 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10721810.1016/j.ultras.2023.107218 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11771-011-0758-710.1007/s11771-011-0758-7 ↗
38. 10.1080/10589759.2014.94183810.1080/10589759.2014.941838 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.10734110.1016/j.ultras.2024.107341 ↗