journal article·2026-01-05

A privacy-preserving transfer network for universal fault diagnosis of the gearbox with dynamic threshold

Jipu Li, Ke Yue, Zhaoqian Wu, Fei Jiang, Shaohui Zhang, Weihua Li

Publisher page

Abstract

In industrial applications, deep transfer learning (DTL) has become a promising paradigm for improving the generalisation of diagnostic models by leveraging labelled source domains to adapt to unlabelled target domains. However, existing DTL-based methods are often tailored to specific scenarios with fixed domain settings and rely on direct access to source data, raising privacy concerns. To overcome these limitations, a novel Privacy-preserving Universal Transfer Network (PUniTN) is proposed for intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD) of gearbox under universal domain adaptation (UniDA) settings. PUniTN adopts a source-free architecture to ensure data privacy and employs a feature decomposition strategy to orthogonally separate common and private fault features. Meanwhile, a decision boundary with dynamic threshold further enables accurate identification of private fault types in the target domain. Moreover, a multi-component objective combining supervised, decomposition, and consistency losses enhances model generalisation. Experiments on two public gearbox benchmarks demonstrate that PUniTN consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both shared and private fault recognition, providing a robust and privacy-preserving solution for intelligent diagnostics in open, evolving industrial environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Fault Detection and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

South China University of Technology

Dongguan University of Technology

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240448910.1080/10589759.2024.2404489 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2025.247410210.1080/10589759.2025.2474102 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.11235410.1016/j.knosys.2024.112354 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2025.251255710.1080/10589759.2025.2512557 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.12383610.1016/j.eswa.2024.123836 ↗
6. 10.1186/s10033-024-01173-810.1186/s10033-024-01173-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11042910.1016/j.ress.2024.110429 ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20250098110.1002/advs.202500981 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.10110.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jsv.2024.11856210.1016/j.jsv.2024.118562 ↗
11. Zheng Y, He G, Li W, et al. A physically interpretable sparse representation-based auto-encoder network for impact fault extraction. In: Yan R, Lin J, editors. Equipment intelligent operation and maintenance. CRC Press; 2025. p. 819–829.10.1201/9781003470076-79 ↗
12. Xiao Y Song D Wu N. Development of compact smart bearing and novel hybrid feature assessment for weak defect identification. Nondestr Test Eval. 2025. p. 1–27.
13. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11097810.1016/j.ress.2025.110978 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2024.239536310.1080/10589759.2024.2395363 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2025.254555310.1080/10589759.2025.2545553 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.10218610.1016/j.inffus.2023.102186 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.aei.2024.10243610.1016/j.aei.2024.102436 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.energy.2024.13041910.1016/j.energy.2024.130419 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11175010.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111750 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11055610.1016/j.ress.2024.110556 ↗
21. 10.1109/TIM.2025.354213810.1109/TIM.2025.3542138 ↗
22. 10.1109/TII.2023.334544910.1109/TII.2023.3345449 ↗
23. 10.1109/TTE.2025.352976410.1109/TTE.2025.3529764 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11224410.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112244 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.12513710.1016/j.eswa.2024.125137 ↗
26. 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.337644910.1109/TNNLS.2024.3376449 ↗
27. 10.1109/TASE.2024.350242610.1109/TASE.2024.3502426 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.isatra.2023.12.01910.1016/j.isatra.2023.12.019 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11082810.1016/j.ress.2025.110828 ↗
30. 10.1109/TASE.2024.351960810.1109/TASE.2024.3519608 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.01910.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.019 ↗
32. Saito K, Saenko K. Ovanet: one-vs-all network for universal domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the ieee/cvf international conference on computer vision, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2021. p. 9000–9009.
33. 10.1109/TIM.2022.321857410.1109/TIM.2022.3218574 ↗
34. Yue K, Li W, Li J, et al. Source-free partial domain adaptation in rotating machinery fault diagnosis using deep hypothesis domain adaptation network. In: 2022 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD), Harbin, China. IEEE; 2022. p. 1–6.
35. Liang J, Hu D, Feng J. Do we really need to access the source data? Source hypothesis transfer for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria. PMLR; 2020. p. 6028–6039.
36. Kundu JN, Venkat N, Babu RV, et al. Universal source-free domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA; 2020. p. 4544–4553.