A privacy-preserving transfer network for universal fault diagnosis of the gearbox with dynamic threshold
Source abstract
Abstract
In industrial applications, deep transfer learning (DTL) has become a promising paradigm for improving the generalisation of diagnostic models by leveraging labelled source domains to adapt to unlabelled target domains. However, existing DTL-based methods are often tailored to specific scenarios with fixed domain settings and rely on direct access to source data, raising privacy concerns. To overcome these limitations, a novel Privacy-preserving Universal Transfer Network (PUniTN) is proposed for intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD) of gearbox under universal domain adaptation (UniDA) settings. PUniTN adopts a source-free architecture to ensure data privacy and employs a feature decomposition strategy to orthogonally separate common and private fault features. Meanwhile, a decision boundary with dynamic threshold further enables accurate identification of private fault types in the target domain. Moreover, a multi-component objective combining supervised, decomposition, and consistency losses enhances model generalisation. Experiments on two public gearbox benchmarks demonstrate that PUniTN consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both shared and private fault recognition, providing a robust and privacy-preserving solution for intelligent diagnostics in open, evolving industrial environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
South China University of Technology
Dongguan University of Technology
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240448910.1080/10589759.2024.2404489 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2025.247410210.1080/10589759.2025.2474102 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.11235410.1016/j.knosys.2024.112354 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2025.251255710.1080/10589759.2025.2512557 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.12383610.1016/j.eswa.2024.123836 ↗
6. 10.1186/s10033-024-01173-810.1186/s10033-024-01173-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11042910.1016/j.ress.2024.110429 ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20250098110.1002/advs.202500981 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.10110.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jsv.2024.11856210.1016/j.jsv.2024.118562 ↗
11. Zheng Y, He G, Li W, et al. A physically interpretable sparse representation-based auto-encoder network for impact fault extraction. In: Yan R, Lin J, editors. Equipment intelligent operation and maintenance. CRC Press; 2025. p. 819–829.10.1201/9781003470076-79 ↗
12. Xiao Y Song D Wu N. Development of compact smart bearing and novel hybrid feature assessment for weak defect identification. Nondestr Test Eval. 2025. p. 1–27.
13. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11097810.1016/j.ress.2025.110978 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2024.239536310.1080/10589759.2024.2395363 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2025.254555310.1080/10589759.2025.2545553 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.10218610.1016/j.inffus.2023.102186 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.aei.2024.10243610.1016/j.aei.2024.102436 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.energy.2024.13041910.1016/j.energy.2024.130419 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11175010.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111750 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11055610.1016/j.ress.2024.110556 ↗
21. 10.1109/TIM.2025.354213810.1109/TIM.2025.3542138 ↗
22. 10.1109/TII.2023.334544910.1109/TII.2023.3345449 ↗
23. 10.1109/TTE.2025.352976410.1109/TTE.2025.3529764 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11224410.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112244 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.12513710.1016/j.eswa.2024.125137 ↗
26. 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.337644910.1109/TNNLS.2024.3376449 ↗
27. 10.1109/TASE.2024.350242610.1109/TASE.2024.3502426 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.isatra.2023.12.01910.1016/j.isatra.2023.12.019 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11082810.1016/j.ress.2025.110828 ↗
30. 10.1109/TASE.2024.351960810.1109/TASE.2024.3519608 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.01910.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.019 ↗
32. Saito K, Saenko K. Ovanet: one-vs-all network for universal domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the ieee/cvf international conference on computer vision, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2021. p. 9000–9009.
33. 10.1109/TIM.2022.321857410.1109/TIM.2022.3218574 ↗
34. Yue K, Li W, Li J, et al. Source-free partial domain adaptation in rotating machinery fault diagnosis using deep hypothesis domain adaptation network. In: 2022 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD), Harbin, China. IEEE; 2022. p. 1–6.
35. Liang J, Hu D, Feng J. Do we really need to access the source data? Source hypothesis transfer for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria. PMLR; 2020. p. 6028–6039.
36. Kundu JN, Venkat N, Babu RV, et al. Universal source-free domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA; 2020. p. 4544–4553.