Automatic recognition for tunnel lining voids in GPR images based on SC-PGGAN and bidirectional collaborative data augmentation
Source abstract
Abstract
The quality of tunnel lining is a key factor affecting the quality of tunnel construction. Currently, lining defect identification relies on manual interpretation of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data, which is inefficient and its accuracy depends on the experience of on-site personnel. Additionally, developing high-accuracy automatic detection models requires a large number of data samples, but it is difficult to obtain sufficient samples in practical research. Existing data augmentation methods suffer from issues such as loss of details in GPR images and low image quality. To address this issue and improve tunnel lining void identification performance, this paper proposes a Spectrum-Constrained PGGAN (SC-PGGAN) network model, which can generate a large number of high-quality GPR images. Experiments show that the images generated by the SC-PGGAN model outperform the GAN and PGGAN models in terms of FID, PSNR, and SSIM metrics. Furthermore, a method for automatic identification of lining voids based on bidirectional collaborative data augmentation is proposed to improve void detection accuracy. Experiments show that training the YOLOv13 model with this method achieves an mAP@50 of 91.70%, outperforming Faster R-CNN (76.04%), RT-DETR (82.54%), and YOLOv13 (84.50%). This paper provides an effective method for high-precision identification of tunnel lining voids.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University
China Railway Engineering Equipment Group Co., Ltd
Industrial Science & Technology Institute for Anti-Fatigue Manufacturing
Henan Province Engineering Research Center of Anti-Fatigue Manufacturing Technology
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.10599810.1016/j.tust.2024.105998 ↗
2. 10.3390/rs1304067210.3390/rs13040672 ↗
3. 10.3390/rs1402025110.3390/rs14020251 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.03210.1016/j.tust.2017.08.032 ↗
5. 10.3390/rs1322459610.3390/rs13224596 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.01110.1016/j.tust.2016.12.011 ↗
7. Li S, Cui X, Guo L, et al. Enhanced automatic root recognition and localization in GPR images through a YOLOv4-based deep learning approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2022;60(1–14):5114314.
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11128110.1016/j.measurement.2022.111281 ↗
9. Zhou X, Chen H, Li J. An automatic GPR B-scan image interpreting model. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2018;56(99):3398–3412.10.1109/TGRS.2018.2799586 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.03010.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.030 ↗
11. Todkar SS, Baltazart V, Ihamouten A, et al. One-class SVM based outlier detect thin interlayer debondings within pavement structures using ground penetrating radar data. J Appl Geophysics. 2021;192:104392.10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104392 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.10746210.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107462 ↗
13. Pham MT, Lefèvre S. Buried object detection from B-scan ground penetrating radar data using Faster-RCNN. Proc IGARSS IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp. 2018;1:6804–6807.
14. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10404410.1016/j.autcon.2021.104044 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10426010.1016/j.autcon.2022.104260 ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2023.219988010.1080/14680629.2023.2199880 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11265210.1016/j.measurement.2023.112652 ↗
18. 10.1111/mice.1304210.1111/mice.13042 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11390310.1016/j.measurement.2023.113903 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.11835410.1016/j.measurement.2025.118354 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14190710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141907 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10451610.1016/j.autcon.2022.104516 ↗
23. Akali S, Erden F. Support of data augmentation with GAN on Faster R-CNN based buried target detection. In: 29th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference; Istanbul, Turkey; 2021. p. 1–4.
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11540610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115406 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10383010.1016/j.autcon.2021.103830 ↗
26. Yang S, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. Defect segmentation: mapping tunnel lining internal defects with ground penetrating radar data using a convolutional neural network. Const Building Mater. 2022;319:125658.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125658 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0277910.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02779 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tust.2023.10526510.1016/j.tust.2023.105265 ↗
29. 10.1109/TVCG.2017.267608910.1109/TVCG.2017.2676089 ↗
30. Luo TXH, Lai WWL, Giannopoulos A. Forward modelling on GPR responses of subsurface air voids. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2020;103:103521.10.1016/j.tust.2020.103521 ↗
31. Laurens VDM, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9(2605):2579–2605.