Ultrasonic bidirectional phase shift migration imaging of wrinkles in carbon/glass hybrid composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Wrinkles in hybrid composites could significantly affect mechanical properties. Considering their irregular interfaces compared to regular layered structures, a bidirectional phase shift migration (B-PSM) algorithm with vertical and horizontal wavenumber variations is proposed to reconstruct wrinkle images in hybrid composites. A wavefield extrapolation operator based on the bidirectional wavenumber distribution is connected with the Fourier transform of full-matrix capture data to realise the wavefield migration from the surface to a given depth in the material. The obtained wavefield is accumulated and inverse Fourier transformed to realise the image reconstruction. Experiments are performed on carbon/glass hybrid composite specimens with wrinkles. The grey level co-occurrence matrix-based features from B-PSM outperform that of classical PSM by a factor ranging from 1.24 to 8.69, which are also better than those from vertical or horizontal wavenumber PSM. All the wrinkle assessment errors in B-PSM imaging are less than 10%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai University
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11435810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114358 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.001 ↗
3. Phillips LN. The hybrid effect - does it exist? Composites. 1976;7:7–8.10.1016/0010-4361(76)90273-1 ↗
4. Marom G, Fischer S, Tuler FR, et al. Hybrid effects in composites: conditions for positive or negative effects versus rule-of-mixtures behaviour. J. Mater. Sci. 1978;13:1419–1426.10.1007/BF00553194 ↗
5. Fischer S, Marom G, Tuler FR. Hybrid effects in composites: a comparison between interlaminar and translaminar configurations. J. Mater. Sci. 1979;14:863–868.10.1007/BF00550717 ↗
6. 10.3390/jcs401000610.3390/jcs4010006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.026 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10053210.1016/j.coco.2020.100532 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11097110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110971 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10875510.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108755 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.006 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0054238710.1007/BF00542387 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11076210.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110762 ↗
16. 10.3390/jcs403013010.3390/jcs4030130 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11236210.1016/j.tws.2024.112362 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10942010.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109420 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10809710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108097 ↗
20. Spencer M, Chen X. Static and fatigue cracking of thick carbon/glass hybrid composite laminates with complex wrinkle defects. Int J Fatigue. 2023;177:107963. doi: 10.10.16/j.ijfatigue.2023.10796310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107963 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.03410.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.034 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.14610.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.146 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.01.00210.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.01.002 ↗
25. 10.1784/insi.2014.57.3.13110.1784/insi.2014.57.3.131 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11104810.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111048 ↗
27. 10.1109/TUFFC.2024.343665810.1109/TUFFC.2024.3436658 ↗
28. 10.1177/073168442093486810.1177/0731684420934868 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1612423610.3390/ma16124236 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10697510.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106975 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11693910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116939 ↗
32. 10.1784/insi.2024.66.3.14110.1784/insi.2024.66.3.141 ↗
33. 10.1117/12.255818810.1117/12.2558188 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10043510.1016/j.coco.2020.100435 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10737610.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107376 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10681510.1016/j.ultras.2022.106815 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10714910.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107149 ↗
38. 10.1190/1.144018510.1190/1.1440185 ↗
39. 10.1190/1.144082810.1190/1.1440828 ↗
40. 10.1190/1.144082610.1190/1.1440826 ↗
41. 10.1190/1.144089910.1190/1.1440899 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10911410.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109114 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.05.00810.1016/j.ultras.2016.05.008 ↗
44. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.304702110.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047021 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10623310.1016/j.ultras.2020.106233 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10246010.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460 ↗
47. 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.277477610.1109/TUFFC.2017.2774776 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.06810.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.068 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12247-012-9144-810.1007/s12247-012-9144-8 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.01010.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.01110.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.011 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11569110.1016/j.eswa.2021.115691 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.00110.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.001 ↗
54. Gadkari D. Image quality analysis using GLCM [master’s thesis]. Orlando (FL): University of Central Florida; 2004.
55. 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.38210.1016/j.procs.2020.03.382 ↗
56. 10.1177/0161734621100978810.1177/01617346211009788 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10280410.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102804 ↗