journal article·2025-10-16

Couplant-induced stress evaluation errors in ultrasonic measurement: multivariable quantification and differential wedge mitigation

Yuhong Zhu, Yang Zheng, Yibo Wang, Yizheng Zhang, Yan Lyu, Chang Ma, Cunfu He

Publisher page

Abstract

Longitudinal critically refracted (LCR) waves can offer efficient near-surface stress assessment, but suffering from couplant-induced inaccuracies, which undermine its reliability. This study quantitatively evaluates the effects of couplant type, dosage, and pressure on time-of-flight (TOF) stability, and the stress error propagation through synchronised TOF-digital image correlation (DIC) measurements. It shows that only 20 µm reduction in honey couplant thickness under a 2–3 kg preload shifts the TOF by 7.8 ns, which illustrates an equivalent 170 MPa error in stress estimation. Highviscosity couplants display nonlinear TOF-pressure hysteresis, while under cyclic loading oil and gel couplants producing TOF variability, fundamentally undermining reproducibility. To mitigate artefacts, a dual-receiver differential wedge is developed, suppressing common-mode TOF shifts by 90% for viscous couplants under dynamic loading. However, errors persist due to irreducible dose-pressure asymmetries, constraining practical accuracy to 50 MPa. Consequently, the strict couplant state invariance (±0.05 ml dosage; ±0.2 kg pressure) between calibration and measurement can hardly achievable. Our findings establish operational protocols for industrial applications tolerating ± 50 MPa uncertainty while advocating couplant-free technologies for precision-critical scenarios.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Flow Measurement and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing University of Technology

China Special Equipment Inspection & Research Institute

AVIC Research Institute for Special Structures of Aeronautical Composites

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.12.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2015.12.003 ↗
2. 10.1109/TIM.2020.301641110.1109/TIM.2020.3016411 ↗
3. 10.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2022-014610.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2022-0146 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10316910.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103169 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRev.92.114510.1103/PhysRev.92.1145 ↗
6. 10.1016/0963-8695(95)00020-X10.1016/0963-8695(95)00020-X ↗
7. 10.1080/09349847.2013.82213410.1080/09349847.2013.822134 ↗
8. 10.1179/1432891715Z.000000000136010.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001360 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40430-013-0049-310.1007/s40430-013-0049-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.19010.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.190 ↗
11. 10.1002/mawe.20170005010.1002/mawe.201700050 ↗
12. Zhu QM. Research on correction methods and mechanisms of longitudinal critical wave refraction (LCR) stress measuring technology [master thesis]. China: Southwest Jiaotong University; 2017.
13. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.01710.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.017 ↗
14. 10.1016/0041-624X(63)90003-910.1016/0041-624X(63)90003-9 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma904022310.3390/ma9040223 ↗
16. Song W, Pan Q, Xu C, et al. Residual stress nondestructive testing for pipe component based on ultrasonic method. In: 2014 IEEE Far East Forum on Nondestructive Evaluation/Testing; Chengdu china. (NY). IEEE; 2014. p. 163–167.10.1109/FENDT.2014.6928254 ↗
17. 10.1121/1.190957910.1121/1.1909579 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultras.2005.11.00210.1016/j.ultras.2005.11.002 ↗
19. Xiao F, Yu WQ, Gui XL. Effect of probe pressure on defect size assessment during ultrasound detection. Nondestr Test. 2015:74–76.
20. 10.1088/1757-899X/740/1/01200510.1088/1757-899X/740/1/012005 ↗
21. 10.1784/insi.2022.64.4.19210.1784/insi.2022.64.4.192 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10958310.1016/j.measurement.2021.109583 ↗