Stress identification and gas tightness performance evaluation of casing couplings based on weak magnetic detection technology
Source abstract
Abstract
At present, the casing leakage problem is still frequent, the new gas sealing buckle has not been completely solved under the influence of complex working conditions and installation errors, and the existing detection means of equipment is a bulky and complicated process. This paper proposes to detect the performance of casing gas sealing based on weak magnetic stress detection technology, aiming to establish a fast and convenient detection method. The research focuses on the p-110 grade TP-G2 casing and establishes a stress-weak magnetic signal detection system, revealing the correlation between the casing’s stress state and the variation of magnetic flux density. The study developed stress distribution models for typical casings under three different gas-tight sealing conditions, analysed the differences in leakage and sealing conditions, and established a mapping relationship between gas-tight performance and stress distribution. Experimental results demonstrate that weak magnetic detection technology can accurately characterise the stress concentration features on the threaded connection sealing end. Through the model, the variations of magnetic flux density, stress distribution, and gas-tight performance for p-110 steel are revealed, providing scientific evidence for stress and sealing performance detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Southwest Petroleum University
Xinjiang Oilfield Oil Recovery Process Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Science and Technology Program · Open Fund · State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Development of Southwest Petroleum University
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Li JZ, Li Q, Xu HC. Sealing testing techniques of underground gas storage based on salt caverns. Nat Gas Ind. 2011;31(5):90–92+95+123–124.
2. Lu P. Flow meter sealed acoustic emission test based on support vector machine. Automation Instrum. 2020;5:25–27+32.
3. 10.1007/s00603-018-1571-510.1007/s00603-018-1571-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.21325210.1016/j.geoen.2024.213252 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.06.00710.1016/j.petrol.2015.06.007 ↗
6. Li XB, Hu ZL. Finite element analysis of premium connection base on static model and strain rate model. Steel Pipe. 2017;46(4):62–65.
7. Li Q, Ji AM, Liu WB, et al. Finite element analysis on the sealing performance of the casing premium thread connection[C]. In: Mechanics and Materials Science: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mechanics and Materials Science (MMS2016). Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA; 2018. p. 1172–1178.
8. Vishnyakov P, Yangirov F, Ibragimov D, et al. Ways to increase the sealness of screwed joints of casing string. AIP Conf Proc: AIP Publishing LLC. 2023;2700(1):020018.10.1063/5.0125356 ↗
9. Shen ZX, Li HJ, Zhao G, et al. Discussion on evaluation methods for sealing test of tubing and casing premium connection. Petroleum Tubul Goods Instruments. 2024;10(5):24–27+32.
10. Wang L, Yuan H, Zhang WX, et al. Finite element analysis of mechanical and sealing properties of HST special thread Oil casing. China Offshore Platf. 2024;39(1):97–102.
11. 10.1051/e3sconf/20223380101310.1051/e3sconf/202233801013 ↗
12. 10.3390/pr1203057410.3390/pr12030574 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10629510.1016/j.petrol.2019.106295 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.10520010.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105200 ↗
15. Wang T. Analysis of metal magnetic memory signal characteristics of special equipment in use. Die Mould Manufacture. 2023;23(10):262–264.
16. 10.1109/TMAG.2021.312120010.1109/TMAG.2021.3121200 ↗
17. 10.1109/TMAG.2021.310282210.1109/TMAG.2021.3102822 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.01.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2011.01.008 ↗
19. 10.1007/s40799-020-00419-z10.1007/s40799-020-00419-z ↗
20. Wang GQ, Yang LJ, Liu B. Study on the testing method of oil-gas pipeline stress damage based on magnetic memory. Chin J Sci Instrument. 2017;38(2):271–278.
21. Tian Y. Study on weak megnatic detection model based on strain of pipeline. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 2024;43(1):67–74.
22. 10.3390/magnetochemistry701000710.3390/magnetochemistry7010007 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10812-024-01655-610.1007/s10812-024-01655-6 ↗
24. 10.1088/1755-1315/632/4/04206410.1088/1755-1315/632/4/042064 ↗
25. Jiang G, Haiyang F, Bo P, et al. Recent progress of residual stress measurement methods: a review. Chin J Aeronaut. 2021;34(2):54–78.10.1016/j.cja.2019.10.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-110.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1 ↗
27. RP 5C5 A P I. Procedures for testing casing and tubing connections. 2017.