journal article·2025-09-16

Acoustic emission active channel intruder detection system based on machine learning

Sumit Vashista, Anju Agrawal, Ravneet Kaur, Sushil Kumar Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) based acoustic emission (AE) testing has become one of the mainstream methods for structural health monitoring of materials and structures. In this study, an ML-based approach has been proposed to identify and distinguish AE activities generated on a novel active channel intruder detection system (ACIDS), based on parametric analysis. The proposed AE-based ACIDS is better than conventional intruder detections systems as it is immune to signal loss and environmental noise. The novel design of ACIDS redefines the limits of acoustic detection, discussed briefly in this article. Experiments with different intruder activities subjected on the ACIDS have been used to generate AE signals. The acquired AE signals are then analysed using clustering hits and filtering techniques to distinguish between normal disturbances and potential intruders. Different types of human activities for intruder detection were then distinguished using ML techniques. This paper aims to integrate ML with AE technology to provide real-time warnings and reduce the noise-based triggering and achieving up to 99.9% accuracy in binary classification with optimised models. This system can benefit security applications from an unobtrusive, and reliable IDS solution for perimeter protection, such as a nuclear power plant, a military base, or an international fenceless border fencing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Control Systems · Advanced Algorithms and Applications · Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Delhi

Defence R&D Organisation

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Khan SA, Ahmad I, Shufian A, et al. A smart intruder alert system based on microprocessor and motion detection. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics,Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST); Dhaka, Bangladesh. IEEE; 2019. p. 335–339.10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644109 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11220-025-00566-w10.1007/s11220-025-00566-w ↗
3. Xiaofeng Y, Chunguang Z. Design of airport enclosures remote laser intrusion detection and alarm system. Int J Phys Sci [Internet]. 2011;6(17):4282–4286.
4. Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5712. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.
5. Omorogiuwa E, Eseosa O, Promise E. GSM based intelligent home security system for intrusion detection. Article Int J Eng Intell Syst Electr Eng Commun [Internet]. 2014;4(10):595–605.
6. 10.14257/ijsh.2013.7.6.1910.14257/ijsh.2013.7.6.19 ↗
7. Capel V. Security systems and intruder alarms. Woburn, MA, USA: Newnes; 1999.
8. 10.1007/s10064-024-03857-w10.1007/s10064-024-03857-w ↗
9. 10.3390/s2306322610.3390/s23063226 ↗
10. 10.1080/10589759.2023.220871710.1080/10589759.2023.2208717 ↗
11. Kumar D, Mahapatro AK, Singh SK. A potential landslide early warning system based on threshold velocity of 1 mm/min. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (RASSE); Kerala, India. IEEE; 2023. p. 1–6.
12. 10.1007/s11069-025-07316-x10.1007/s11069-025-07316-x ↗
13. Vashista S, Kumar D, Kaur R, et al. IoT-based landslide detection system. In: Satyajit C, Ashiq AS, Souti C, et al, editors. Interdisciplinary research in technology and management. London: CRC Press; 2024. p. 491–497.
14. 10.3390/s2313579210.3390/s23135792 ↗
15. 10.3390/en1208147210.3390/en12081472 ↗
16. 10.1080/1058975080258801010.1080/10589750802588010 ↗
17. 10.1080/10589759.2019.169201210.1080/10589759.2019.1692012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.002 ↗
19. 10.1080/10589759.2025.246060810.1080/10589759.2025.2460608 ↗
20. 10.1109/TCE.2005.140571010.1109/TCE.2005.1405710 ↗
21. Ono K. Application of acoustic emission for structure diagnosis [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305346746
22. Ciaburro G, Iannace G. Machine-learning-based methods for acoustic emission testing: a review. Applied sciences (Switzerland). Basel, Switzerland: MDPI; 2022.
23. Kumar D, Mahapatro AK, Singh SK. Optimisation of acoustic emission sensor- waveguide assembly for soil slope instability measurement. Integr Ferroelectr. 2025;241:1–10.
24. 10.1007/s10064-024-03548-610.1007/s10064-024-03548-6 ↗
25. Johnson KL. Contact mechanics. 9th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1985.10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
26. 10.1080/10589759.2011.58902910.1080/10589759.2011.589029 ↗
27. 10.3390/act1202008910.3390/act12020089 ↗
28. 10.1155/2010/89548610.1155/2010/895486 ↗
29. 10.3390/electronics909136110.3390/electronics9091361 ↗
30. 10.1080/10589759.2024.243114310.1080/10589759.2024.2431143 ↗
31. 10.3390/informatics804007910.3390/informatics8040079 ↗
32. 10.3390/s2418614510.3390/s24186145 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.01910.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.019 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.01810.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.018 ↗
35. 10.3390/app1109400810.3390/app11094008 ↗
36. 10.1177/147592172092282410.1177/1475921720922824 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.12.00210.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.12.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.06.00210.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.06.002 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10994-023-06389-810.1007/s10994-023-06389-8 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10994-023-06465-z10.1007/s10994-023-06465-z ↗