Impact of wire feed rate on mechanical properties of GMA Welded joints: a qualitative evaluation using nonlinear ultrasonic technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Welded assemblies often fail at the weld nugget or heat-affected zone (HAZ) despite stringent design and inspection protocols. This study evaluates the potential of ultrasonic non-destructive testing (NDT) method, specifically nonlinear ultrasonics (NLU), for assessing robotic gas metal arc (GMA) welded mild steel joints fabricated using Cold Metal Transfer (CMT) and pulsed current modes with wire feed rates (WFR) in the range of 4.5–6.5 m/min. Variation in WFR altered the heat input, resulting in distinct microstructural changes in different zones of the welded assembly. Microhardness measurements revealed a minimum (~210 VHN) in the HAZ and a maximum (~290 VHN) in the weld nugget. Yield strength was maximum for both CMT and pulsed current mode with WFR 5.5 m/min. NLU testing indicated a ~20% increase in the nonlinear parameter at the HAZ compared to the virgin alloy, suggesting the formation of a weakest link close to HAZ in the welded structure. This increase is attributed to microstructural heterogeneity and variation in residual stress, with tensile residual stresses being highest near the HAZ–weld interface. The findings highlight that NLU effectively identifies failure-prone regions and provides a reliable, non-destructive approach to assess weld quality without the need for specific sample preparation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory
Funding
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India · Science and Engineering Research Board
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Phillips DH. Welding engineering: an introduction. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
2. 10.1557/opl.2015.40910.1557/opl.2015.409 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11837-003-0134-710.1007/s11837-003-0134-7 ↗
4. 10.1080/2374068X.2025.250104410.1080/2374068X.2025.2501044 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dt.2017.08.00210.1016/j.dt.2017.08.002 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1718447910.3390/ma17184479 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-016-9053-y10.1007/s00170-016-9053-y ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10933010.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109330 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.aca.2024.34349610.1016/j.aca.2024.343496 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14677410.1016/j.msea.2024.146774 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11351210.1016/j.matchar.2023.113512 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11661-013-1693-z10.1007/s11661-013-1693-z ↗
13. 10.1007/s40436-013-0041-210.1007/s40436-013-0041-2 ↗
14. Badheka VJ. Effect of metal-cored arc welding process parameters on weld bead geometry. Weld Cut. 2013;2:106–111.
15. 10.1016/0963-8695(96)00009-610.1016/0963-8695(96)00009-6 ↗
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.933.10910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.933.109 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.04610.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.046 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11665-019-3867-310.1007/s11665-019-3867-3 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0056600310.1007/BF00566003 ↗
21. Martin T, Knaak S, Aktaa J. Immersion ultrasonic testing on EUROFER welded joints for determination of the minimum detectable flaw size. In: Proceedings of DGZfP Conference; Hamburg, Germany; 2010. p. 10–12.
22. 10.1007/s10921-014-0273-510.1007/s10921-014-0273-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.10.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2012.10.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.12.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2015.12.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.00910.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.11.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2014.11.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.02.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2012.02.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.01.03810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.01.038 ↗
30. 10.1007/s40195-013-0168-y10.1007/s40195-013-0168-y ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.02.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2017.02.007 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.09.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2010.09.008 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.08810.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.088 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.01210.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.012 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10365310.1016/j.addma.2023.103653 ↗
36. Park S, Bokhari I, Alnuaimi H, et al. Inspection of steel tube welded joint using nonlinear ultrasonic technique. In: Fromme P, Su Z, editors. Health monitoring of structural and biological systems XVI. Vol. 12048. California, USA: SPIE; 2022. p. 269–274.
37. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.16510.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.165 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11665-021-06272-410.1007/s11665-021-06272-4 ↗
39. 10.1080/10589759.2024.233552810.1080/10589759.2024.2335528 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.09410.1016/j.msea.2013.10.094 ↗
41. 10.1080/01694243.2023.219231410.1080/01694243.2023.2192314 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10921-012-0134-z10.1007/s10921-012-0134-z ↗
43. 10.1002/srin.20230064010.1002/srin.202300640 ↗
44. 10.3390/met903027110.3390/met9030271 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11340-015-0003-710.1007/s11340-015-0003-7 ↗
46. 10.1121/1.38823310.1121/1.388233 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.07.01510.1016/j.ultras.2017.07.015 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.36830910.1063/1.368309 ↗
49. Blackstock DT, Hamilton MF, editors. Nonlinear acoustics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998.
50. 10.3390/app1010347610.3390/app10103476 ↗
51. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab61b610.1088/2053-1591/ab61b6 ↗
52. 10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R0410.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R04 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.10929710.1016/j.jcsr.2024.109297 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11665-023-08959-210.1007/s11665-023-08959-2 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.01510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.015 ↗
56. 10.4172/2169-0022.100013810.4172/2169-0022.1000138 ↗
57. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00137-910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00137-9 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.04.00410.1016/j.commatsci.2004.04.004 ↗