journal article·2026-08-03

Deep attention driven spatial spectral framework for dimensionality reduction and land cover classification

Shahnas P, S. Malathy

Publisher page

Abstract

Land cover classification is crucial in remote sensing for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and resource management. Traditional techniques often struggle with complex landscapes, leading to misclassification and lower dependability. Deep learning (DL)-based algorithms offer a more accurate and resilient solution. This paper presents an effective DL-based system for improving land cover categorization, integrating temporal and spatial branches and leveraging spectral-temporal fusion. The method achieves superior classification accuracy with minimal misclassification. Performance evaluations show the system can differentiate various land cover types with an Overall Accuracy (OA) of 99.74%, Average Accuracy (AA) of 99.58%, and a Kappa Coefficient (KC) of 0.9965 on the Pavia University (PU) dataset and 97.19% OA, 96.68% AA, and KC of 0.9687 on the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) dataset. These results establish the framework as a reliable classification system for hyperspectral imaging, paving the way for further refinements and broader applicability in real-world remote sensing tasks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use · Remote Sensing in Agriculture

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Karpagam Academy of Higher Education

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Sharma NA, Kumar K, Chand RR. Utilizing hyperspectral imaging with machine learning techniques for soil analysis. Comput Intel Based Hyperspectral Image Anal. 2024;2024.
2. 10.1016/j.scs.2023.10465310.1016/j.scs.2023.104653 ↗
3. Sifnaios S Arvanitakis G Konstantinidis FK et al. A deep learning approach for pixel-level material classification via hyperspectral imaging. 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13498.
4. 10.3390/rs1513322310.3390/rs15133223 ↗
5. 10.1080/05704928.2021.199925210.1080/05704928.2021.1999252 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41598-022-16223-110.1038/s41598-022-16223-1 ↗
7. 10.1080/17538947.2022.215955210.1080/17538947.2022.2159552 ↗
8. Patil D, Rane NL, Desai P, et al. Machine learning and deep learning: methods, techniques, applications, challenges, and future research opportunities. Trustworthy Artif Intel Ind Soc. 2024:28–81.
9. 10.53759/9852/JRS20230100110.53759/9852/JRS202301001 ↗
10. 10.1109/TGRS.2023.327263910.1109/TGRS.2023.3272639 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10262310.1016/j.rineng.2024.102623 ↗
12. Guo Q, Cen Y, Zhang L, et al. Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on spatial-spectral cross guided mask auto-encoder. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 2024. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/aboutJournal.jsp?punumber=4609443
13. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.335652310.1109/JSTARS.2024.3356523 ↗
14. 10.31219/osf.io/5cfvp10.31219/osf.io/5cfvp ↗
15. 10.3390/s2407208910.3390/s24072089 ↗
16. 10.3390/rs1418457910.3390/rs14184579 ↗
17. 10.1109/TGRS.2020.296384810.1109/TGRS.2020.2963848 ↗
18. 10.1080/14498596.2023.222794810.1080/14498596.2023.2227948 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.00510.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.11193810.1016/j.rse.2020.111938 ↗
21. 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.306287210.1109/JSTARS.2021.3062872 ↗
22. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.296194710.1109/TGRS.2019.2961947 ↗
23. 10.3390/rs1502031610.3390/rs15020316 ↗
24. 10.1109/TGRS.2020.303192810.1109/TGRS.2020.3031928 ↗
25. 10.1109/TCYB.2020.302893110.1109/TCYB.2020.3028931 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.01.00410.1016/j.ejrs.2024.01.004 ↗