Machine learning techniques for damage assessment and classification: a synergistic approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The incorporation of machine learning techniques with structural health monitoring has demonstrated a significant performance improvement, attributed to the ability of machine learning to effectively handle large datasets. This work primarily concentrates on developing machine learning models that classify different damage types of a three-dimensional frame. Dynamic analysis and classification methods are used to explore a total of eight distinct structural states. As a part of the experimental investigation, a three-dimensional frame is excited using a 40 kg payload capacity uniaxial shake table. The responses are measured using accelerometers, a key component of vibration-based non-destructive testing (NDT) for analysis purposes. Three prominent machine learning methods: KNN, decision trees, and support vector machines are employed for classification study. Various classification metrics that include accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and specificity are employed to evaluate the performance of the classifiers. The KNN and decision tree models showed high accuracy levels and indicated consistency across different train-test splits. Furthermore, a notable enhancement of 15% in accuracy was observed when the number of channels was increased from one to three. These findings highlight the ability and effectiveness of using ML models in vibration-based NDT and SHM for structural damage classification.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rsta.2006.192810.1098/rsta.2006.1928 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.56.27710.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.56.277 ↗
3. 10.1155/2023/666580310.1155/2023/6665803 ↗
4. 10.3390/s2010277810.3390/s20102778 ↗
5. 10.1098/rsta.2000.071710.1098/rsta.2000.0717 ↗
6. 10.1080/1573247100373067410.1080/15732471003730674 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2025.246172910.1080/10589759.2025.2461729 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2019.169201110.1080/10589759.2019.1692011 ↗
9. 10.1177/147592170404750010.1177/1475921704047500 ↗
10. 10.1007/s40430-023-04628-610.1007/s40430-023-04628-6 ↗
11. 10.1177/1475921723116821210.1177/14759217231168212 ↗
12. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340280910.1109/ACCESS.2024.3402809 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12090810.1016/j.eswa.2023.120908 ↗
14. 10.7763/IJMLC.2015.V5.52610.7763/IJMLC.2015.V5.526 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10722610.1016/j.engappai.2023.107226 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10612510.1016/j.istruc.2024.106125 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 ↗
18. Adeli Hung shih-Lin H. Machine learning : neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy systems. (NY): Wiley; 1995.
19. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa52ed10.1088/1361-6501/aa52ed ↗
20. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10575310.1016/j.istruc.2023.105753 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10999-023-09692-310.1007/s10999-023-09692-3 ↗
22. 10.1007/s13349-016-0168-510.1007/s13349-016-0168-5 ↗
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/30410.1088/0964-1726/10/3/304 ↗
24. Santos A, Silva MF, Santos R, et al. Output-only structural health monitoring based on mean shift clustering for vibration-based damage detection. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring; Spain; 2016 Jul 5–8.
25. 10.1007/s11668-024-01883-010.1007/s11668-024-01883-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.00810.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.008 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engappai.2016.03.00210.1016/j.engappai.2016.03.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.10161010.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101610 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.10208010.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102080 ↗
30. 10.1007/s13349-013-0038-310.1007/s13349-013-0038-3 ↗
31. 10.12783/SHM2015/14610.12783/SHM2015/146 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10805210.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108052 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.10161110.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101611 ↗
34. Charles RF, Keith W. Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. United States: Wiley; 2012 656 978-1-119-99433-6.
35. 10.1515/cls-2022-021410.1515/cls-2022-0214 ↗
36. Amezquita-Sanchez J, Adeli H. Feature extraction and classification techniques for health monitoring of structures. Scientia Iran Trans A, Civ Eng. 2015;22(6):1931–1940.
37. 10.1186/s40064-016-2941-710.1186/s40064-016-2941-7 ↗
38. 10.38094/jastt2016510.38094/jastt20165 ↗
39. Manohar C, Venkatesha S, Karthik M, et al. Development of experimental setups for earthquake engineering education C S, Manohar. In: National workshop on experimental methods in earthquake engineering research. Bangalore: IISC Bangalore; 2005 Feb 10–11.
40. 10.3390/app1411467110.3390/app14114671 ↗
41. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.334997110.1109/ACCESS.2024.3349971 ↗